Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Bill Simmons: Clippers discussed Blake Griffin trade with Denver

Posted on 2/5/16 at 2:31 pm
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81775 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 2:31 pm




plus future first (NOT this year's lottery)




plus future first (NOT this year's lottery)
This post was edited on 2/5/16 at 2:43 pm
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81775 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 2:33 pm to
We're not "most lottery teams" as we have a top 3 player in the world just entering his prime.

Could we be contenders by 2017/18 when we'd have to try to sign Blake? Even if it didn't work you could still deal him for a boatload of other pieces to try "Rebuild 3.0"

I feel like Clipper would do this - EG and Ryno would give them a better team this year than injured Blake would, plus they're expirings, plus they'd get a high lottery pick from us. Hell, maybe we could make it a "future 1st" and keep our high lottery pick this year.

Is it too risky for us? I feel like AD and Griffin and Qpon and Holiday would give Gentry 60% of a top-3 starting lineup in the NBA.
This post was edited on 2/5/16 at 2:35 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115870 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 2:50 pm to
Clips aren't giving up Blake for that crap, don't believe otherwise.

We would have to give up this year's pick with little to no protection (MAYBE top 3, at best) and a future pick as well.

And other teams may still offer better.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61506 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 3:05 pm to
Yeah. If a star player is involved the first question to ask is "How much would Boston offer" and then go from there. Boston does seem to have become very attached to the Brooklyn pick and Crowder, so they may not be willing to offer as much as once thought, but at the minimum you'd have to think Bradly, Sullinger + their 1st, the Dallas 1st, and the Minnesota 2nds. That's 2 picks in the late teens to 20s, 2 high 2nds, and 2 decent players on decent contracts (Sully is RFA which should limit how much he gets). And this is a top 10 player we're talking about so if there actually was competitive bidding, I bet Boston would give up either Crowder or the top 3 protected Nets pick.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115870 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 3:10 pm to
Yup. Boston has done a masterful job gathering assets.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81775 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 3:21 pm to
I defer to you guys, but one question: wouldn't a destination city/team like the Clippers value cap space more than normal teams would?

A) They'd likely want to keep Anderson and he'd likely want to resign
B) They could sign anybody else they want/are able to

I feel like our offer of "superior players for 2016 playoffs) plus a potential high lottery pick this season" is maybe as attractive to them as the Boston package. WTF do they want 4 high draft picks - they need to win NOW while CP3 is still more or less in his prime.
This post was edited on 2/5/16 at 3:27 pm
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22428 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 3:21 pm to
Wouldnt we have a similar problem where our 2 best players play the same position, that we do now?
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 3:47 pm to
Pump the breaks:

quote:

Dan Woike 

?@DanWoikeSports

Sources: Denver reached out and asked about Blake Griffin but Clippers weren't interested. Not much discussion




quote:


Ben Bolch

?@latbbolch

Multiple teams have inquired with Clippers about Blake Griffin offering various packages but team has no active interest in deal, per source


This post was edited on 2/5/16 at 3:51 pm
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61506 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

wouldn't a destination city/team like the Clippers value cap space more than normal teams would?


If they think they can get in the hunt for KD, yes. But Boston can still give them 2 1sts and an early 2nd to provide cheap depth even if they don't want Bradley and Sullinger to make a run at KD. You can probably flip those 2 for something else, hell maybe we trade somthing like Ryno and Dante for that. Clippers get 2 PFs for this year to help replace Blake, and still have the cap space they need to go after KD.
Posted by xxKylexx
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2011
4039 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Clips aren't giving up Blake for that crap, don't believe otherwise.

We would have to give up this year's pick with little to no protection (MAYBE top 3, at best) and a future pick as well.

And other teams may still offer better.


All of this.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52614 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 5:08 pm to
Not giving up a first for Blake griffin.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram