- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rolling Stones or Beatles?
Posted on 10/18/14 at 11:34 am to CaptainPanic
Posted on 10/18/14 at 11:34 am to CaptainPanic
Beatles
1
Posted on 10/18/14 at 12:10 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
It is very hard to argue against the Beatles, right time, right place and the huge influence they had not only on music but culture.
But they are very, very different types of bands. After the early years, the Beatles essentially became a studio band, while the Stones strength (although they had several classic and monumental albums) was always on stage.
While the Beatles crafted pop songs, with hooks and harmonies in the studio. The Stones were establishing the standards for rock and roll for the look, swagger and stage performance that bands still follow today.
The Beatles wanted to hold your hand, the Stones wanted satisfaction.
But they are very, very different types of bands. After the early years, the Beatles essentially became a studio band, while the Stones strength (although they had several classic and monumental albums) was always on stage.
While the Beatles crafted pop songs, with hooks and harmonies in the studio. The Stones were establishing the standards for rock and roll for the look, swagger and stage performance that bands still follow today.
The Beatles wanted to hold your hand, the Stones wanted satisfaction.
Posted on 10/18/14 at 12:32 pm to WhopperDawg
I wasn't born when the stones were rocking. So the superior quality of the songs the Beatles wrote out them well ahead of the stones for me.
Posted on 10/18/14 at 1:29 pm to Tigertown in ATL
I don't care for either one, but if I was forced to pick, I'd pick The Beatles.
Give me Zeppelin or Floyd over either one of those any day.
Give me Zeppelin or Floyd over either one of those any day.
Posted on 10/18/14 at 9:00 pm to WhopperDawg
quote:
But they are very, very different types of bands. After the early years, the Beatles essentially became a studio band, while the Stones strength (although they had several classic and monumental albums) was always on stage.
The Beatles were the Steely Dan of that era.
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News