Started By
Message

re: Total Recall(1990) vs Total Recall(2012)

Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:55 am to
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
30877 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:55 am to
1990 definitely better but 2012 wasn't bad.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:51 am to
This is like comparing a great Ribeye Steak with a bowl of dogshite.
Posted by theone
LSU
Member since Nov 2005
1809 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 5:11 pm to
I watched the new one on a plane a couple of days ago. I only watched it becuase it was a flight to Tokyo and I needed something for my fourth movie.

It didn't follow the first movie at all.....that being said I was surprised that I didn't have to turn it off, it was actually slightly more than watchable.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76176 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Posted by WPBTiger 1990 definitely better but 2012 wasn't bad.

This. 2012 was not anywhere near as horrible as posters here like to make it out to be. I think a lot of it is people are nostalgic about 1990.

I don't know this for fact but I've heard 2012 is actually more faithful to the original Total Recall story than 1990. Besides, if 2012 was exactly the same as 1990 then people would bitch that it was the same.
Posted by Tiger Authority
Member since Jul 2007
29476 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 7:55 pm to
Worth the rental to look at Kate Beckinsale.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram