Started By
Message

Is this just being super nit-picky, or did it bother anyone else how in Rogue One

Posted on 3/29/17 at 12:54 am
Posted by el duderino III
People's Republic of Austin
Member since Jul 2011
2382 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 12:54 am
Quite a few of the ships were different than in A New Hope, when it is supposed to end like moments before that movie. Yeah they had the Xwings, Y-wings, and regular TIE fighters, but there were numerous other rebel and imperial (both fighter and transport) ships that just disappeared from the fleets in a movie that took place a few hours before the next. It just seems like if they would have spent a little more time and resources on character development instead of on aesthetics and designing new ships that dont even make sense they could have gone from a good movie to a truly great movie, but maybe that decision was based purely on screen time limitations.

Legitimate grief or just a nerd with too much free time? or both
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 1:02 am to
I'd be more interested in discussing this if you would give examples. The one that sticks out to me is the corvette designed to ram other capital ships.

And honestly that doesn't bother me. I like to think there is a vast universe in Star Wars that was never shown to us because the story of Episodes 4 through 6 was basically the story of one group of people. We never really leave them to go explore the greater portion of the universe.

So basically if Luke, Han, or Leah didn't see, ride in, or come across a ramming corvette then we as the audience never saw it.

TL; DR - doesn't bother me that there are other ships that are introduced in Rouge One
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21145 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 1:04 am to
There were new ships in every single episode. They got toys to sell, bro.

But generally, no. They had enough consistencies to satisfy me.
Posted by Wrenchruh
Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2012
2413 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 5:46 am to
The way I look at it is a lot of Rogue One takes place in atmosphere so there are ships specific to fighting in that.

And toys, gotta sell some toys.
Posted by KingSlayer
Member since May 2015
2854 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 7:06 am to
quote:

The one that sticks out to me is the corvette designed to ram other capital ships.


The Hammerhead ships and how they got them was covered in an episode of Star Wars Rebels. Actually, a lot of the building of the rebel forces has been covered in that series.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18376 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 7:31 am to
Isn't the Hammerhead a ship from a long time ago? Like thousands of years ago making it rarer ship than the newer x-wings? I might be remembering that incorrectly.
Posted by Das Jackal
Da Bayou
Member since Sep 2011
2588 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 7:49 am to
Nah it didn't bother me. Every SW movies will have some new ships even if it's a prequel.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
12747 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Quite a few of the ships were different than in A New Hope, when it is supposed to end like moments before that movie. Yeah they had the Xwings, Y-wings, and regular TIE fighters, but there were numerous other rebel and imperial (both fighter and transport) ships that just disappeared from the fleets in a movie that took place a few hours before the next.


It doesn't bother me at all.

Outside of the Tantive IV, Vader's Star Destroyer and one or two other destroyers when the Falcon leaves Mos Eisley, we don't see any other capital shops in A New Hope.

The bulk of the rebel fleet has moved on to somewhere else and the rebel base has been at least partially evacuated (given that Mon Mothma isn't there) and so they may not have a full compliment of fighters either.

The Death Star doesn't need a contingent of ships to defend it because of the defensive systems built around it, and it carries a smaller group of TIE Fighters because they don't expect to have to defend against small one man ships.

If anything, I would have expected to see the Rogue One ships during the Battle of Endor, but given that took place several years after Rogue One, it is possible that the rebel ships have been destroyed in clashes in between movies.
Posted by BloodSweat&Beers
One Particular Harbor, Fl
Member since Jan 2012
9153 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 7:57 am to
quote:


It doesn't bother me at all.

Outside of the Tantive IV, Vader's Star Destroyer and one or two other destroyers when the Falcon leaves Mos Eisley, we don't see any other capital shops in A New Hope.

The bulk of the rebel fleet has moved on to somewhere else and the rebel base has been at least partially evacuated (given that Mon Mothma isn't there) and so they may not have a full compliment of fighters either.

The Death Star doesn't need a contingent of ships to defend it because of the defensive systems built around it, and it carries a smaller group of TIE Fighters because they don't expect to have to defend against small one man ships.

If anything, I would have expected to see the Rogue One ships during the Battle of Endor, but given that took place several years after Rogue One, it is possible that the rebel ships have been destroyed in clashes in between movies.




Pretty sure that these ships (Medium transports) are in Rogue One, Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi.

Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13295 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 7:59 am to
I thought they remained fairly consistent with the look of Rogue One and Episode IV.

I'm more bothered by how all of the ships and technology seemed MUCH MUCH more advanced in the prequel series than in the original series. Not that much time has passed in the timeline, yet it looks like they took a huge step back in technology. I realize that they were in a time of war, but still... (I've only seen the movies. I have not read books, comics, seen cartoons etc to obtain any outside knowledge other than what was shown in the films)
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8313 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:08 am to
You are bothered with the fact that technology advanced, in real time, from 1977-1983 to 1999-2005?? That seems rather petty... you are just looking for something to complain about.
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11834 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:24 am to
quote:

I'm more bothered by how all of the ships and technology seemed MUCH MUCH more advanced in the prequel series than in the original series.


Remember in the prequels the two opposing armies were the droid army which I would expect their ships to be top notched with the latest technology and the other was the clone army that had been being designed for years prior to coming to the fray. The rebel ships now are basically any craft they could manage to beg, borrow, or steal from supporters or salvage yards.
This post was edited on 3/29/17 at 8:31 am
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34884 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:31 am to
It bothered me some, not a ton, but definitely irked me, especially with some of the fighters and transport ships. It is just weird seeing ships that are prominent parts of the rebellion that will inexplicably never be used/see again from the exact same people in about a weeks time.

Not a huge issue by any means, but was a little weird.
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13295 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:35 am to
quote:

You are bothered with the fact that technology advanced, in real time, from 1977-1983 to 1999-2005?? That seems rather petty... you are just looking for something to complain about.


Are you an idiot?
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
16248 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:42 am to
My popcorn tasted a little funky, and the kid behind me kept slurping his empty Hi-C, but other than that I enjoyed every minute of Rogue One. No complaints.
Posted by sumtimeitbeslikedat
Vidalia, La
Member since Nov 2013
4424 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:24 am to
What bothered me a little is how easily the At-Ats were destroyed in rogue one. The x-wings annihilated them.
Posted by BloodSweat&Beers
One Particular Harbor, Fl
Member since Jan 2012
9153 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:28 am to
quote:

What bothered me a little is how easily the At-Ats were destroyed in rogue one. The x-wings annihilated them.


That is why they upgraded the armor in Empire.
Posted by sumtimeitbeslikedat
Vidalia, La
Member since Nov 2013
4424 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:30 am to
...and I know thereis a big difference between speeders and the x-wings, which are starfighters, but I wish they would have been a little more balanced. At-Ats are supposed to be some bad mother's.
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11834 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:30 am to
The At-Ats were always suspect to under the neck weak armor. Even in the ESB.
Posted by sumtimeitbeslikedat
Vidalia, La
Member since Nov 2013
4424 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:32 am to
I know that, but the x-wings were blowing them in half in rogue one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram