Started By
Message

re: A24's Civil War - Spoiler Thread... eventually

Posted on 4/15/24 at 5:50 pm to
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112327 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Forgive me The movies kinda just ends. One moment you are running from a genocidal manic Jesse Plemmons and then 15 mins later the movie is over


Yeah I just mean like what specifically would you have wanted to see in that 10 minutes? I think the films ending, with structurally abrupt, doesn’t really leave many things left hanging to resolve narratively
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6557 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Yet this movie was portrayed as white people bad and their president is a fascist.

This is basically a movie to warn you what happens if you vote for Trump. It’s a left wing fantasy.

The fact this got up votes is pretty telling that half this board lives in fantasy land rather than real life. This wasn't the movie at all
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30878 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 10:31 am to
quote:

The fact this got up votes is pretty telling that half this board lives in fantasy land rather than real life. This wasn't the movie at all


There's definitely a segment on here that seems hellbent on being perceived as persecuted no matter what.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115789 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Also felt hoodwinked a bit. Trailer had lots of action and battle scenes, but I felt that was an extremely small percentage of the overall movie. Way more of a focus on journalism and getting the perfect shot amidst high body counts and bloodshed.

Overall all it was a good movie, but a far cry from the super high action that was conveyed in the trailer


This was known by everyone like 6 months ago.

The director flat out said it, and its an A24 production
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35637 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 4:09 pm to
i'm really surprised there hasn't been more discussion on this board about this movie. it seemed like there was a lot of interest over the past few months. it seems only a handful of the people here have seen it.
Posted by cfish140
BR
Member since Aug 2007
7242 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Overall all it was a good movie, but a far cry from the super high action that was conveyed in the trailer


I knew this was going to be the main beef with most people. I knew this wasn’t going to be the case going in because it’s an A24 movie and on top of that an Alex Garland movie. If you’re familiar with either you’ll know they don’t do straight forward popcorn flicks but films that require deeper thought.

I just got out. Not sure what to make of it. This is one I have to sleep on. I thought it was just ok until the DC invasion. Heavy stuff that kinda confused you as to who the hell you should root for. I think it was mostly about the repercussions of what happens when a nation falls that far and the de-sensitivity of the media to war.
Posted by OzonaOkapi
Patrolling the Edwards Plateau
Member since Apr 2024
400 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 6:21 pm to
Did anyone else notice that the WF helicopters in the final scenes still had First Cav (Fort Hood) insignia, with a simple "WF" stencil in white added to the nose?

If the WF had time to manufacture and sell 2-star flags, you would think they could have done a better job re-marking their birds.

=====

A lot of people keep saying the Jessie Plemons was wearing a military uniform, but I looked very carefully and he was wearing no insignia whatsoever. Seemed more like a free-agent Ratko Mladic than a member of any of the Balkanized military units.

=====

As I sat in the theater, I just could not figure that suicide bomber in NYC that exploded himself at the truck distributing water. He ran onto the screen carrying an (original) American flag, which made not sense to me at the time since it was happening in NYC. It took me half the film to realize that the WF already had control of NYC, despite the map reflected in the window showing that area still in control of DC. Doh. But I still don't understand the suicide bomber element, because that sort of nutcase is usually a religious zealot, and the Offerman government just didn't seem like one that would give rise to religious extremists in its supporters.

=========

I was also puzzled that the WF forces had standing orders to kill President Offerman. From equipment and tactics, it was obvious that those were originally US regular Army troops, with the concomitant training and mindset ... inconsistent with those orders. I concluded that the VP had surrendered to the WF along with the US generals and was willing to work the WF after the war. Leaving Offerman alive would have created major structural roadblocks to making that happen, while killing Offerman would leave him as undisputed POTUS of the rump US.
This post was edited on 4/17/24 at 1:17 pm
Posted by OzonaOkapi
Patrolling the Edwards Plateau
Member since Apr 2024
400 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

There's definitely a segment on here that seems hellbent on being perceived as persecuted no matter what.
You should visit the Poli Board.
Posted by OzonaOkapi
Patrolling the Edwards Plateau
Member since Apr 2024
400 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 6:35 pm to
I continue to be baffled by everyone asking "what was Garland's message?"

He used a World War Z (the book) vignette approach to show EVERY form of extremism from anywhere in the world in the last few decades, taking place HERE. His message was (to me) clear. This (bad) stuff can happen anywhere.

Suicide bomber? check
Burning tire necklacing? check
Breakdown of the electrical grid? check
Refugee columns along roadways? check
Neighbors killing/torturing one another? check
Ethnic cleansing? check
Etcetera

I half expected for us to witness a rape at the refugee center in the football stadium.

Most of this "bad stuff" made no sense in the context of the war/scenario that he created. That was not the point. It was SUPPOSED to be confusing, because this sort of war IS confusing. Each vignette didn't have to be realistic in its specific setting. Seriously, how do you "realistically" set ethnic cleansing in Pennsylvania? Find an antagonist who hates the Amish for some odd reason? Garland just wanted you to think about it happening within our borders, because it CAN happen anywhere.
This post was edited on 4/16/24 at 8:18 pm
Posted by OzonaOkapi
Patrolling the Edwards Plateau
Member since Apr 2024
400 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Tim Poole just saw it. Apparently, Trump (basically) is president, he has disbanded the FBI and DC is held by white supremacist stormtroopers. The boogaloo boys shoot at the cops, rednecks are everywhere, the only extremists the main characters encounter are right wingers, the military force that restores order is comically diverse and they kill pseudo-Trump in the White House.

It's basically The Godfather for pink haired psycho retards
This is just about the worst, most-inaccurate description of this film conceivable. Of course, it comes from Tim Poole, who has the IQ of a particularly-dimwitted box of turnips.
This post was edited on 4/16/24 at 8:16 pm
Posted by OzonaOkapi
Patrolling the Edwards Plateau
Member since Apr 2024
400 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

this movie was portrayed as white people bad and their president is a fascist.

This is basically a movie to warn you what happens if you vote for Trump. It’s a left wing fantasy.
Whoever provided that "portrayal" is a halfwit of epic proportions.
This post was edited on 4/16/24 at 7:52 pm
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79135 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

Yet this movie was portrayed as white people bad and their president is a fascist.

This is basically a movie to warn you what happens if you vote for Trump. It’s a left wing fantasy.
so have we actually seen the movie yet or
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49274 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

wish we got more background as to what happened to set everything off

I don’t think that was what the movie was supposed to be about. It’s about what comes after the fall and how it affects every day Americans. But there is some context clues in the movie

1. President has suspended the constitution which allowed him a third term.

2. Very likely that the first election wasn’t exactly clean as well Offerman getting his followers into Congress and finding Yes Men for the Supreme Court. Likely killing off Justices

3. Second term economy has tanked (reference to extreme hyper inflation at the gas station) and President has super majority in Congress

4. Mass protests and riots breakout as the president holds a death grip on DC abolishing the FBI and likely kicking out of the press of DC aside from a select few. Protests and riots lead to air strikes on citizens

5. Somehere during the second term Cali and Texas leave the country which causes a domino effect. US government starts war with the two states which causes the alliance

6. Seems like Florida alliance is more worried about recruiting more states as mentioned about Charlottesville than fighting. However Sammy did mention once DC falls they will start fighting. Unsure if this means Cali and Texas or the WF and Florida Alliance
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49274 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:00 pm to
So I just got out of it and beanie boi is either trolling or an idiot

quote:

DC is held by white supremacist stormtroopers

Literally zero indication of the US government being white supremacists, bro just making shite up
quote:

The boogaloo boys shoot at the cops,

A few dudes in Hawaiian shirts get in a fire fight with an unknown enemy and the dudes are pretty diverse racially
quote:

rednecks are everywhere,

One scene at a gas station in rural Pennsylvania
quote:

only extremists the main characters encounter are right wingers

Also zero indication that these guys are right wingers once again Beanie boy lies
quote:

the military force that restores order is comically diverse

The force? The Western Forces of citizens from Texas and Cali being not all white? Well I’m shocked it’s not like either state has a large minority population
quote:

kill pseudo-Trump in the White House.

They kill the authoritarian dictator president literally zero reasons to believe he’s in anyway a reference to Trump aside from dumbass paranoia
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
17024 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:47 pm to
Saw it today.

It’s basically a movie about photography and wartime photographers.

So very little on the ‘civil war’ I assumed it would be about.

How anyone could say this film is an attack on Trump and conservatives is beyond me.

Should have been re-written with a focus on the cause and battles of the civil war.

The few action scenes were well-done, especially the scene with Meth Damon.

Best part of the film was the score- so many excellent, surprising, and well-placed tunes. Especially the De La Soul ‘Say No Go’. Caught me off-guard in a good way.

Overall a decent movie. Worth a single viewing. 3/5
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49274 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Should have been re-written with a focus on the cause and battles of the civil war.

I think Garland’s point of the movie was to show what a real war in America would look like. A lot of shite gets said about people wanting a civil war but the cold truth is that a war torn America would be a nightmare and we see that through the most apolitical way which are photojournalists.

If the movie gave away everything that caused the war than the focus would be on the why and not the result. It’s a pretty genius way to avoid unnecessary conflict
Posted by cfish140
BR
Member since Aug 2007
7242 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 5:08 am to
The sniper scene was pretty powerful. Kill or be killed even if you dont know what the adversary stands for. Any thoughts on the significance of the colored hair and fingernails of the sniper and spotter?

Also, for those debating Plemmons character, wiki describes him as an ultranationalist militiamen. So, a psycho secessionist using the war as an excuse to kill civilians
This post was edited on 4/17/24 at 5:12 am
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35637 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 6:15 am to
quote:

Any thoughts on the significance of the colored hair and fingernails of the sniper and spotter?


Had to be with the same guys as the Hawaiian shirts a few scenes before. The same colors were on a wall from that scene. Almost looked like a powdered grenade had went off there or something.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30878 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 9:29 am to
quote:

You should visit the Poli Board.


I'd have to set fire to my computer and buy a new one.

No thanks.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30878 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

getting his followers into Congress and finding Yes Men for the Supreme Court.


quote:

President has super majority in Congress


Essentially a complete breakdown of the checks and balances. I could see a breakdown of the checks and balances as a cause for a civil war in the US.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram