- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will the Angels think about trading Mike Trout and what would it take?
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:23 pm
From Keith law
quote:
I've been doing these rankings for eight years now, and this is by far the worst system I've ever seen. They traded their top two prospects in the Andrelton Simmons deal and had no one remotely close to top-100 status. They need a big draft this year to start to restock the system or we're going to start talking about whether it's time to trade Mike Trout.
This post was edited on 2/11/16 at 4:27 pm
6
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:24 pm to WestCoastAg
No
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:28 pm to WestCoastAg
Yankees lock
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:33 pm to BayouBengals03
We are obviously 5 to 6 years, minimum, before really discussing this but I think the discussion of what it would take to get him is interesting. I would tell the angels the entire organization outside of Kershaw is available
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:36 pm to WestCoastAg
No they won't. Hard to even fathom what kind of package it could realistically take, it would obviously have to be young controllable ML talent plus big time prospects.
The Angels system is a steaming shite pile though
The Angels system is a steaming shite pile though
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:37 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
I would tell the angels the entire organization outside of Kershaw is available
I don't think Seager + Urias is enough, honsetly
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:38 pm to WestCoastAg
NO
they have cash to resign him, no reason to deal him
they have cash to resign him, no reason to deal him
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:39 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:
I don't think Seager + Urias is enough, honsetly
Yeah most definitely not
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:41 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Well yea. You would need to throw in major league cost controlled talent like adding both Pederson and puig. Seager, urias, puig, and Pederson and that's just for starters
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:46 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
puig
eh, not worth the headache
quote:
Pederson
meh
This post was edited on 2/11/16 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:47 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Yankees lock
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:47 pm to MrWiseGuy
Any theoretical deal would need three teams involved for them to get the right kind of return IMO
Just not that many teams that can offer what it would take, then the question becomes why blow it up?
Just not that many teams that can offer what it would take, then the question becomes why blow it up?
This post was edited on 2/11/16 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:50 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:I mean, he was a top 15 positional player in both 2013 and 2014 and he really hasn't had any major issues. I wouldn't really consider him a big issue.
eh, not worth the headache
quote:as of right now? Sure. But in a year or two when you combine his defensive talents in center, his raw power, and a greater understanding of how to approach at bats?
meh
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:50 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
The only realistic teams who can get him are big spending market teams who can spend money on replenishing their farm systems
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:55 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
I mean, he was a top 15 positional player in both 2013 and 2014 and he really hasn't had any major issues. I wouldn't really consider him a big issue.
quote:
as of right now? Sure. But in a year or two when you combine his defensive talents in center, his raw power, and a greater understanding of how to approach at bats?
just telling ya, if I'm trading the best player in baseball in his age-24 season, Joc Pederson and Yasiel Puig don't come to mind as centerpieces I want in return.
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:56 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:like I said, seager, urias, pederson, and puig are just starters. Like Shane said, it would likely take a third team to get involved as well to add more.
Joc Pederson and Yasiel Puig don't come to mind as centerpieces I want in return.
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:57 pm to WestCoastAg
The Cubs are probably the only ones who I think could offer what would be deemed as fair with all the young ML talent they have plus prospects. Maybe the Dodgers
But if you're the Cubs, why blow up your young homegrown core for one player? Even if it is the best player on the planet I don't know that it gets you closer to a championship plus all the chemistry factors
But if you're the Cubs, why blow up your young homegrown core for one player? Even if it is the best player on the planet I don't know that it gets you closer to a championship plus all the chemistry factors
This post was edited on 2/11/16 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:57 pm to WestCoastAg
He's going to the Yankees when he becomes a FA in 2020 when he's 28.
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:57 pm to WestCoastAg
I guess. Those pieces don't move the needle for me.
All have major question marks
All have major question marks
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:58 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Problem with the Dodgers is we don't have great, cost controlled, talent. Once you get past puig you are looking at pederson and seager who are still question marks on what their value is
This post was edited on 2/11/16 at 5:00 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News