Started By
Message

Who's more important to the Patriots: Brady or Belichick?

Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:02 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:02 pm
tried to make this as short as possible, while still explaining my stance.

Folks talk about how Brady is just a product of Belichick, but I think it's quite the opposite.

Let's not forget that Belichick went 36-44 at Cleveland and was fired. He lead them to ONE playoff game from 1991-1995. He went 5-11 in his final season even after starting 3-1.

When he got to New England, he had 1 losing season in 2000. This is still his only losing season as the HC for New England. This is also the only year in which Brady didn't start at QB. This was the year he was drafted.


The very next year the Patriots went 11-5 and won the Super Bowl. I think we all know the Brady story from this year when Bledsoe went down in the second game of the regular season. But let's not forget that Bledsoe lost the opening game to a bad Cincinnati team who eventually finished 6-10. Bledsoe goes down in game 2 vs the Jets, in comes Brady. The rest of 2001 is history and the Brady era begins.

So what I see is that as soon as Brady took over the starting QB job, the Patriots had a complete and utter turnaround from a 5-11 year to 11-5 and winning a Super Bowl.

So, let's discuss.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 1:04 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112214 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:03 pm to
Let's not

Let's just say they're both all time greats and be done with it
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:04 pm to
or you can just not click on threads that have topics that are uninteresting to you

eta or you could read the OP and see that I have a point.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 1:05 pm
Posted by Brageous
Member since Jul 2008
107724 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:04 pm to
quote:


Let's not forget that Belichick went 36-44 at Cleveland and was fired. He lead them to ONE playoff game from 1991-1995. He went 5-11 in his final season even after starting 3-1.


That's because it's Cleveland. Browns are doomed.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:05 pm to
they're a chemical compound

we don't know which element is more important, we just know that together, they're one bad arse chemical.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:05 pm to
I agree. But don't forget about 2000...the turnaround when brady took over is undeniable IMO
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27230 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Let's not

Let's just say they're both all time greats and be done with it


It's a discussion board. If you don't want to discuss things, log out.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:05 pm to
Belichick wasn't so hot with Bledsoe...who was a damn good QB IMO.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:06 pm to
honestly, I implore you to watch the football life documentary on belichick's browns


he was also the defensive coordinator for the giants for 2 championships and the coordinator for the patriots when they went to the superbowl in NOLA in 96.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:06 pm to
Belichick is below .500 in NE without Brady starting, so...
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:06 pm to
Belichick
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112214 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

It's a discussion board. If you don't want to discuss things, log out.


My post has created more discussion than the OP so far

Not anymore
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 1:07 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

he was also the defensive coordinator for the giants for 2 championships and the coordinator for the patriots when they went to the superbowl in NOLA in 96.



I remember this
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27230 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

they're a chemical compound

we don't know which element is more important, we just know that together, they're one bad arse chemical.


Yup. They did win 11 games with Cassell and get him a big contract. Worth mentioning.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:07 pm to
Belichick

A QB can't coach the whole team.

This is a dumb question.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:07 pm to
one worded answers are appreciated, but hard to take seriously.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

one worded answers are appreciated, but hard to take seriously.

Pardon?
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66377 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:08 pm to
Beli
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73142 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:08 pm to
Pats went 11-5 without Brady in 2008
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 1:08 pm to
I never said Brady coached the patriots. I asked who is more important. I also have facts within the OP that show the turnaround the Patriots had as soon as Brady took over.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram