- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Super Bowl Odds as of 1/18/17
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:34 pm
Per 5Dimes
Patriots +127
Falcons +263
Steelers +470
Packers +508
Thinking about dropping $100 on both the Steelers and the Packers with those odds.
Patriots +127
Falcons +263
Steelers +470
Packers +508
Thinking about dropping $100 on both the Steelers and the Packers with those odds.
This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 2:35 pm
7
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:37 pm to dcrews
quote:
Packers +508
yep
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:38 pm to dcrews
They should have odds for the Cowboys still. I bet there would still be people that would bet on them.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:41 pm to CocoLoco
Makes me worried though, +508 for a team with Aaron Rodgers against a shite Falcons defense seems too good to be true. Which likely means Atlanta will blow them out 
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:46 pm to dcrews
quote:
Which likely means Atlanta will blow them out
Shut your whore mouth
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:54 pm to dcrews
The Packers defense is very very very bad. Like 200 total yards from being the worst in NFL history bad.
Aaron Rodgers can only compensate for so much. As great as he's been, I think the Packer's time is up. Dallas was a good matchup for them with a QB who struggles to push the ball downfield and if GB does one thing decent on defense, it's stop the run.
Aaron Rodgers can only compensate for so much. As great as he's been, I think the Packer's time is up. Dallas was a good matchup for them with a QB who struggles to push the ball downfield and if GB does one thing decent on defense, it's stop the run.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:55 pm to dcrews
I have packers +1000 and steelers +750 locked from a month ago.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:56 pm to Brodeur
quote:
The Packers defense is very very very bad. Like 200 total yards from being the worst in NFL history bad.
Aaron Rodgers can only compensate for so much. As great as he's been, I think the Packer's time is up. Dallas was a good matchup for them with a QB who struggles to push the ball downfield and if GB does one thing decent on defense, it's stop the run.
ummmmm how is the falcons defense bud? That pass defense is one of leagues worst.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:57 pm to dcrews
My bookie hasn't had positive odds on the Pats since like week 14
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:03 pm to wildtigercat93
my book has
patriots +125
falcons +240
greenbay +350
pitt +450
patriots +125
falcons +240
greenbay +350
pitt +450
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:19 pm to oleyeller
quote:
ummmmm how is the falcons defense bud? That pass defense is one of leagues worst.
It's been pretty bad too, but from a yards/attempt perspective they were still a fair amount better than GB, allowing less yards on 84 more passing attempts.
Look, I'm a Packers fan, and wish I could say, "Atlanta's defense is bad, too!!" But I don't think they are in the same ballpark.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:21 pm to oleyeller
They've improved a lot since the bye week. Beasley is leading the league in sacks and they have a high forced turnover margin compared to their own turnovers.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:24 pm to Brodeur
quote:
Packers +508
If you look at this from a simplistic point of view of "all the Packers have to do is win 2 consecutive games and one is on a neutral field", then that's a hell of a bet with great value.
This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:24 pm to dcrews
I think Atlanta will do what Dallas should have done and control the clocj and run the ball and keep The Bad Man on the sidelines as much as possible.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:52 pm to Brodeur
quote:
The Packers defense is very very very bad. Like 200 total yards from being the worst in NFL history bad.
Statistically, it's still better than Atlanta's defense.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:22 pm to dcrews
quote:
Statistically, it's still better than Atlanta's defense.
Maybe, depending on what metrics you are using. I think you have to look at the # of plays run against each defense, though.
I'm not touting Atlanta's defense in here, either. I've watched more Packers games this year and know their pass defense is the worst in the league. They are razor thin in the secondary.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:28 pm to dcrews
Very odd since its saying NE has the highest chance, then atl, pit, gb.
However 5dimes has it Pitt pk em vs GB, Pitt -2.5 vs atl.
However 5dimes has it Pitt pk em vs GB, Pitt -2.5 vs atl.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:47 pm to PeteRose
I was looking BetOnline and they actually had Green Bay at something like +375
I went ahead and laid the $100 on each GB +508 and Pit +470
Could either be a really good weekend or a bad one
I went ahead and laid the $100 on each GB +508 and Pit +470
Could either be a really good weekend or a bad one
Posted on 1/18/17 at 5:24 pm to dcrews
I'm very dumb when it comes to betting. What would I win if placed 100 on GB to win it all at those odds?
Posted on 1/18/17 at 5:42 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
What would I win if placed 100 on GB to win it all at those odds?
Bet $100 and you profit $508
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News