- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Suh, TPOS, wins appeal will play vs Dallas; Fined 70k
Posted on 12/30/14 at 4:59 pm to Fearthehat0307
Posted on 12/30/14 at 4:59 pm to Fearthehat0307
I didn't watch the game, but when I saw the threads, I thought, "holy shite what did he do?". I literally expected something so horrible. When I saw what actually happened, I almost laughed. It wasn't that bad.
1
Posted on 12/30/14 at 5:00 pm to Chad504boy
He should get to play, its the playoffs, and Dallas is my second favorite team after the Cardinals. I wanna see the best in the playoffs.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 5:01 pm to lsu480
quote:you just became my least favorite poster
and Dallas is my second favorite team
Posted on 12/30/14 at 5:03 pm to SabiDojo
quote:I don't really care about suh or what happens from this situation, but the tape is pretty clear that he intentionally and unnecessarily placed his weight on the foot that was on Rodgers' leg.
The tape is pretty unclear.
Fine is probably the right punishment. Missing a playoff game for what amounts to a little over aggressive gamesmanship seemed harsh.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 5:09 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
The tape is pretty unclear. If you say it's intentional, you can only say that if you keep bringing up Suh's past, which isn't exactly what you want.
I disagree. You always know exactly where everyone's legs and feet are when getting off the pile, otherwise you'll be turning your own ankle every game. Nothing unclear about it. Maybe if we're talking about the death penalty but the burden of proof can't be that great for something like this
Posted on 12/30/14 at 6:02 pm to eddieray
Intent motherfrickers!!! Doesn't that matter anymore? I love those who are saying he shouldn't be suspended for a playoff game. So if it was a regular season game, that would be more acceptable? Come on!
The guy is as dirty as they come. Just look at the eight times he has been fined and the two game suspension. If you think this incident should be viewed in a vacuum, you are crazy.
The NFL had to reduce the suspension to justify the legitimacy of its appeals process. Plain and simple.
The guy is as dirty as they come. Just look at the eight times he has been fined and the two game suspension. If you think this incident should be viewed in a vacuum, you are crazy.
The NFL had to reduce the suspension to justify the legitimacy of its appeals process. Plain and simple.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 6:04 pm to Chad504boy
Suh is just another fricking polenesian sauce fatass trying to get him some shite in the league
Posted on 12/30/14 at 6:06 pm to classictiger
quote:
If you think this incident should be viewed in a vacuum, you are crazy
The NFL dropped his "repeat offender" status as he had gone 32 games without a fine.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 6:13 pm to brgfather129
Why are people shocked
The players have proven time and time again, that they couldn't give 2 shits about each others safety.
You had headhunters getting away with hurting people and the NFLPA made sure they got as little of fines and suspension as possible. Reminds me of the NHLPA, who also don't give a frick if guys leave in body bags.
No way was Brooks or the NFL rep going to uphold the Suspension. The Commish is a liar, and the NFLPA doesnt give a shite about it's members, there are guys waiting to take their place and pay their dues.
The players have proven time and time again, that they couldn't give 2 shits about each others safety.
You had headhunters getting away with hurting people and the NFLPA made sure they got as little of fines and suspension as possible. Reminds me of the NHLPA, who also don't give a frick if guys leave in body bags.
No way was Brooks or the NFL rep going to uphold the Suspension. The Commish is a liar, and the NFLPA doesnt give a shite about it's members, there are guys waiting to take their place and pay their dues.
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 12/30/14 at 6:15 pm to brgfather129
quote:
The NFL dropped his "repeat offender" status as he had gone 32 games without a fine.
Difference between stated and practiced policy. These are human beings after all and it is impossible to discount Suh's reputation. No way the incident draws a $70k fine if it is a first offense by someone with no reputation for dirty behavior.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 6:47 pm to Chad504boy
This makes no sense. Based on his past, you either suspend him or give no punishment. The $70k fine shows that the NFL believes there was some intent to injure, but they'll just ignore the other ~10 times he's done shite like this?
Posted on 12/30/14 at 6:57 pm to OneMoreTime
quote:
Based on his past
I already explained this.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 7:01 pm to Chad504boy
Suh should be kicked out of the league. The NFL may be in the worst condition its ever been in. Wife beatings, steroids, child abuse, its disgusting Goodell.
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 12/30/14 at 7:04 pm to brgfather129
Shouldn't matter that he's gone so long without a fine when you've had as many issues as he's had.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 8:00 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
He deserves to play. It's the playoffs.
He doesn't deserve shite. He's still a goon.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 8:03 pm to OneMoreTime
Ted Cottrell said in his ruling that he didn't believe Suh didn't feel Rodgers leg under his feet. But he overturned the suspension anyway.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 8:04 pm to Chad504boy
I thought his first name was a racist joke.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 8:07 pm to BeYou
quote:
Ted Cottrell said in his ruling that he didn't believe Suh didn't feel Rodgers leg under his feet. But he overturned the suspension anyway.
Exhibit A in my contention (accusation) that the league just wants to appear legitimate in their appeals process.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 8:12 pm to classictiger
Also what does the fine say? Are they saying he intended to step on him but just not that hard?
Posted on 12/30/14 at 8:33 pm to BeYou
quote:Exactly why this decision doesn't make much sense. He either intended to give the cheap shot or he didn't. I have no problem if he won his appeal because they didn't think it was intentional (I personally think it was) but this decision basically says that he did intend to harm but we don't care enough to suspend him for a playoff game.
Also what does the fine say? Are they saying he intended to step on him but just not that hard?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News