- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should Stanford have gone for two on its last touchdown?
Posted on 11/29/15 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 11/29/15 at 12:42 pm
They scored on the first play of the fourth quarter then kicked the PAT for a 35-29 lead.
I say it was dumb not to.
I say it was dumb not to.
5
Posted on 11/29/15 at 1:00 pm to Rex
Too much time left.
Posted on 11/29/15 at 1:12 pm to Rex
Ill actually agree with you Rex. I wouldnt go as far as saying it was dumb not to though. Although there was a lot of time left i feel like once you get into the 4th quarter is when you start doing those things.
Posted on 11/29/15 at 1:12 pm to Ray Penpillage
This would have been a question if they lost. They didn't.
Posted on 11/29/15 at 1:14 pm to CaLSUTigerFan
quote:I dont see why the fact they won makes this an invalid subject. It's still worth talking about, IMO
This would have been a question if they lost. They didn't.
Posted on 11/29/15 at 1:18 pm to Rex
and called TOs on ND's last possession. Betting it all on the D was dumb.
They're lucky that ND TD wasn't overturned
They're lucky that ND TD wasn't overturned
Posted on 11/29/15 at 1:22 pm to Rex
quote:
I say it was dumb not to.
They scored five seconds into the 4th quarter. Taking the sure point was the smart move at that point in the game. Another field goal makes it a two score game. Easy decision.
Posted on 11/29/15 at 2:59 pm to Rex
I think either decision could was fine. It's not like there was less than 10 minutes left; there was more than 14. ND had been inside the 25 four times up to that point of the game and scored zero TDs. It wasn't unreasonable given how the game had been playing out and how much time was left to expect ND to get two more FGs. If that would have happened (and Stanford had gone for two and missed and not scored again), ND would have won 35-34.
The other point: let's pretend the game played out exactly the same way except Stanford went for two and missed. After Kizer's TD run with 30 secs left, ND goes for two and gets it. Now, the score is 37-34 ND and the Stanford FG at the end only sends the game into OT.
The other point: let's pretend the game played out exactly the same way except Stanford went for two and missed. After Kizer's TD run with 30 secs left, ND goes for two and gets it. Now, the score is 37-34 ND and the Stanford FG at the end only sends the game into OT.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News