Started By
Message

Reverse Roles from 2015: Could Steph win with Draymond and Klay out?

Posted on 4/14/16 at 11:54 am
Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 11:54 am
Realize this is purely hypothetical and some may find it pointless discussion. But I very often find myself hashing this idea out in my head.

The Cavs were without their second and third best player last year. LeBron somehow took the best team in the league to 6 games with role players.

Assuming Draymond and Klay are the warriors 2 and 3, would the Warriors be competitive without them, going against a healthy Cavs sqaud?

The Warriors are even better this year, but with a healthy Kyrie and Love, can the Cavs pull the upset?
Posted by LittleRockHog501
Member since Nov 2011
2480 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 11:59 am to
I think he could lose Klay and still win but not Green. Klay's scoring is a little bit more replacable than Green's versatility.

Love was addition by subtraction last year because he didn't/still doesn't fit well and Triston Thompson was a match up nightmare for GS too big and athletic on the boards for any of their big men and allowed the Cavs to beat up on the Ws on the offensive glass
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 12:00 pm
Posted by Rig
BHM
Member since Aug 2011
41856 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 11:59 am to
To me it's ridiculous to try and compare two completely different types of players in a scenario like this.

There's very little commonality shared between LeBron and Steph's game other than their will to be great. It's inherently easier for LeBron to continue to win without help because he's a bigger body and more versatile. Doesn't make him a better player. Just makes him different.

That answers the question to the best of my ability.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:00 pm to
I have a hard time seeing the Warriors being at anywhere near their current level without Green and Thompson.
Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Love was addition by subtraction last year because he didn't/still doesn't fit well


Agree here. I still haven't seen Love mesh well enough to be impressed with him on a nightly basis. Sometimes he makes nice passes, but rarely is he dominant.

Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:01 pm to
Fair point. But still, they are the alphas of their team, and being able to win without others around them's help is a fair discussion.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

The Warriors are even better this year, but with a healthy Kyrie and Love, can the Cavs pull the upset?


it looked like Kyrie was too big for Curry. Kyrie swatted layups away from behind.
Sure, Cavs in 6 if they meet in the finals.

Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Sure, Cavs in 6 if they meet in the finals.


I wonder if more people would rather Steph win another, or LeBron take down the machine that is the warriors?
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:10 pm to
I mean they could probably win a game or two just like the Cavs did.
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Sure, Cavs in 6 if they meet in the finals.



Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110887 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Could Steph win with Draymond and Klay out? by AU_251
Win what, a title? 0% chance.

quote:

would the Warriors be competitive without them, going against a healthy Cavs sqaud?
Probably about as competitive as CLE was last year, but GS wouldn't win, no.

quote:

The Warriors are even better this year, but with a healthy Kyrie and Love, can the Cavs pull the upset?
Highly unlikely. In the past 6 years, this will probably be the 2nd worst Lebron Finals team, assuming he gets there. And he's going up against likely either the best team the Spurs have ever fielded or arguably the best team of all time. The odds are not even close to in his favor.

Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21848 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

I wonder if more people would rather Steph win another, or LeBron take down the machine that is the warriors?



I'll take Steph.


I'm impressed with the Warriors and have enjoyed their utter dominance.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30194 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 12:58 pm to
If Golden State faced a healthy Cavs team last year with Green and Klay, the Cavs would win that series in 5.

Curry can't carry a shorthanded team like LBJ can carry one. They are 2 different players.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:01 pm to
Warriors are still a championship contender without Klay. Without Draymond, no way.

Obviously there's no one on the GSW that can get as hot at Klay can (besides Steph) but I think their replacement players can approximate Klay's role much more easily than Draymond's role.

Without Klay or Draymond? That makes GSW a 5 or 6 seed.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 1:03 pm
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

If Golden State faced a healthy Cavs team last year with Green and Klay, the Cavs would win that series in 5.



jesus christ
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

I wonder if more people would rather Steph win another, or LeBron take down the machine that is the warriors?


Count me in the first group.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4422 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Curry can't carry a shorthanded team like LBJ can carry one. They are 2 different players.


Agree 100%.
Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

If Golden State faced a healthy Cavs team last year with Green and Klay, the Cavs would win that series in 5.


quote:

jesus christ



I don't think it's far fetched to say the Cavs may have won. In 5? Idk. I don't remember how the first couple games went, but I could have seen the Cavs in 6
Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Curry can't carry a shorthanded team like LBJ can carry one. They are 2 different players.


I also agree. Does that make LeBron a better player? If Curry can't do what you say, that means LeBron can do things Curry can't. Besides shoot the three better, are their things Curry can do that LeBron can't?
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4422 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

I also agree. Does that make LeBron a better player? If Curry can't do what you say, that means LeBron can do things Curry can't. Besides shoot the three better, are their things Curry can do that LeBron can't?


I think LBJ is the better player honestly. His ability to guard multiple positions at an elite level as well as his crazy ability to score inside give him the edge. Curry is a better shot maker but that's about it. He isn't near the defender. He's not as versatile. He's still a really good player and very very unique which is why people love him so much.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram