Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:57 am to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:57 am to
he said we'd look on them as barbarians, which is how we look at sports, um, 2000 years ago. what sport do you look at as barbaric from the last 200 years even? and please god don't say bull fighting or cock fighting.

Pretty sure the NFL won't be around for hundreds of years let alone thousands...just playing the odds
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81784 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Take the saints game for example... There were so many penalties, by the third quarter, even Jim Henderson on 870 picked up on it.. There was zero rhythm to the game, no momentum could be had, players on defense cannot be physical with offensive skill positions, etc, etc...



Exactly. The game was a slog - it was atrocious b/c of the penalties. I don't care that somebody who clearly didn't watch it intently is saying there were "only 14 penalties". The 14 penalties they DID call were brutal. And maybe there were were some that were declined or something but that still grate on your nerves and enjoyment of watching.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81784 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:58 am to
Boxing and MMA are insanely brutal. And bull fighting is abhorrent - why is that off limits?
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81784 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Potential TD.. Commercial for review... Come back from commercial, announce TD stands..... XP is kicked, COMMERCIAL..... Kickoff out the back of the end zone.... COMMERCIAL



This really only effects me for Sunday night and Monday night football. Sunday is Red Zone channel all day - maybe Saints or best game taking up the smaller TV
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30116 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:03 pm to
Take away all the QB protection rules, how great would the NFL be when more and more and more QBs keep getting injured and we're watching Luke McCown every weekend?

The NFL seemed to do okay in the 70s and 80s before we wrapped the QBs in bubble wrap.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:04 pm to
you two have it figured out, the games are pure slop and there's no rhythm which makes the gazillion commercial breaks even more unbearable.

honestly though, I fricking cringe watching 3rd and 2 to 4 for any team

it's a showcase demonstration on how teams simply don't know how to run the ball, and how poorly coached a lot of these teams are. Imagine a similar scenario, what if coaches routinely ran draw plays and rarely threw the ball on 3rd and really long...it's fricking boring.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110870 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

The NFL seemed to do okay in the 70s and 80s before we wrapped the QBs in bubble wrap.
Bigger/stronger/faster
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110870 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

honestly though, I fricking cringe watching 3rd and 2 to 4 for any team
Teams in 2014 got .3 first downs less per game via run compared to 2000.

Thsi goes back to other post where i feel that you're taking something that is factually accurate, but grossly exaggerating the actual effect of it.
This post was edited on 10/7/15 at 12:07 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:07 pm to
we don't currently look at boxing and mma fighting as a barbaric sport of yesteryear. bullfighting is abhorrent, but it's more theater than sport. plus what's the competition, who is the competition? the bull? and the whole scenario is rigged in favor of the fighter.

wwf is more of a sport than bullfighting
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
33099 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:09 pm to
We need to get Goodell out as commish. Everything was alright until he showed up.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Teams in 2014 got .3 first downs less per game via run compared to 2000.
do I need to point out the obvious question I have with this statistic?


compared to 2000, how many short and 3rd scenarios were there per game in 2014 with the ball getting tossed around like crazy.

and it's boring even when they do convert because they barely convert and it appears to be some monumental effort. I'm not saying it is, I'm saying how it appears, and it appears that teams struggle mightily on 3rd and short, when it used to be a no brainer to go jumbo package and send in the back.

coaches today instead of imposing their will on these plays, feel they need to outfox everyone...just look at the seahawks INT in the super bowl
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:17 pm to
perhaps...i'm not aware of the relationship and influence he has with the rules committee, but i'd be willing to bet that he proposes a lot of this garbage to them.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:18 pm to
it's too late anyway. the game is irrevocably fricked.

Posted by Solo
Member since Aug 2008
8245 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:20 pm to
Somewhere Adam Silver is chuckling...
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110870 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

do I need to point out the obvious question I have with this statistic?


compared to 2000, how many short and 3rd scenarios were there per game in 2014 with the ball getting tossed around like crazy.
I don't know where to find conversion rates on 3rd and 2 are less, but I'd imagine they aren't much different now than in 2000 or whenever, but i'm guessing we can't prove that one, unless there's an article somewhere to dig up.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:25 pm to
it doesn't matter anyway, I can only point out what I see or how I interpret what I see

and quite frankly, 3rd and short looks like a huge chore compared to the past. the 02 raiders threw it like crazy on 3rd and short and they racked up a lot of short yardage situations, but charlie garner got the ball and when he did it wasn't a gadget, or toss or misdirection...it was up the gut...frick your 9 guys in the box.

teams look scared to run on 3rd and short.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110870 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

it doesn't matter anyway, I can only point out what I see or how I interpret what I see
Well no, it would 100% matter. It would either prove you to be correct, or prove that your eye test/bias clouds your judgment and what you think you see isn't actually so.

It's actually all that matters.

Not only that, you could be right that teams are running less/passing more, but they're successful than ever now, which woudl suggest they're doing the right thing. Or the opposite, which again, would mean you're right.
This post was edited on 10/7/15 at 12:30 pm
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34508 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

And the companies they work for put in policies to protect them, do they not?



Um... Helmet, shoulder pads, mouthpiece, the evolution of helmets..... This is their PPE (personal protective equipment)... They have rules that protect them from EXCESSIVE punishment (clothesline, tripping, clipping, etc)


So how is this any different?
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83937 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:30 pm to
I think everyone is being too dramatic about the NFL. Sure, I think certain rules should be reviewed. However, I think the people who are blaming Goodell for today's game being shitty should keep these things in mind:

1. The NFL is a business. It's not like Goodell just woke up one day and said a QB should never get hit. His actions are caused by external factors. The science behind concussions is new and the masses are scared and outraged (rabble rabble crowd). They allow visceral emotions to take over and demand immediate action. Goodell, worried about PR, does what he can. Did he make the right decision? Probably not, but his actions were expected.

2. The NFL is changing the rules for player safety because former players from the "super badass era" are suing claiming the NFL knew about the dangers. So, if the players from the "greatest era in football" regret how the game was played, how do you expect the commissioner to act?

3. Finally, because awareness of CTE and how it affects sports is relatively new, it's typical for new rules to more err on the side of caution than to reflect the reality of the dangers.

In summary, I think everyone just needs to calm down and enjoy the game for what it is today.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34508 posts
Posted on 10/7/15 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Exactly. The game was a slog - it was atrocious b/c of the penalties. I don't care that somebody who clearly didn't watch it intently is saying there were "only 14 penalties". The 14 penalties they DID call were brutal. And maybe there were were some that were declined or something but that still grate on your nerves and enjoyment of watching



This
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram