Started By
Message

re: Pete Carroll Comments on Stripped USC Title

Posted on 6/14/11 at 11:20 am to
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 11:20 am to
quote:

So petey resurrects his career by paying players. Jumps ship to the NFL, and then says the NCAA is being unfair? Sounds about right

What players did Pete Carroll pay? I don't blame him for leaving, btw. We had a great time while he was at SC, and now we're having the hangover.

But it was a great party, even if the BCS says we never really attended.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 11:44 am to
quote:

quote:
his thoughts

Irrelevant.

USC had an impressive 10-0 season in 2004. Then they failed to see that one of their players was ineligible. Gotta pay.


Are you an accountant for the NCAA or running some retro-CFB fantasy league because you just won't let it go that nobody with a brain cares about this un-American revisionist history-making.

GTFO and move to North Korea if you like pretending the past didn't happen.

This post was edited on 6/14/11 at 11:45 am
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 11:53 am to
quote:

So It was OK for USC TO CHEAT???????????




Everyone who can read on this site and in America knows USC didn't "cheat" by any form of the traditional definition. But it's an easy and convenient word to use for those with arrested development.

quote:

So It was OK for Reggie Bush to violate NCAA rules?????????????


Irrational anger but the above is at least factual correct.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Everyone who can read on this site and in America knows USC didn't "cheat" by any form of the traditional definition.

While I have no problem with Carrol's comments, this is a terrible defense.

Using dictionary.com, here are the definitions of "cheat"
LINK

quote:

5. to violate rules or regulations


USC violated rules. therefore, they cheated. Not by any crazy standard, but by the dictionary definition of the word. USC cheated. We can argue over whether that cheating truly impacted the games, but it is undeniable they broke NCAA rules and regulations.

Everyone who can read knows this.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36112 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:09 pm to
the other issue that is open to interpretation is what intent was of Carroll at USC

He allowed extraordinary access of all types of people (including agents) to his practices and his locker rooms

It gets harder to argue you are doing everything you can to prevent agents getting to your star players... when you allow (if not outright encourage) said access

A cynical person has to wonder if Carroll knew the predictable would occur... agents would get to the kids and money and/or other benfits would be given... the sort of arrangement many coaches seem to look the other way on between school boosters and their players
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:31 pm to
And as it's been pointed out, this was hardly USC's first time to be accused of providing extra benefits to players.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

It gets harder to argue you are doing everything you can to prevent agents getting to your star players


Nothing to do with coaching and recruiting. Reggie took money 2 years AFTER he came to USC - no recruiting advantage - no other player implicated in taking money from agents - so it wasn't an atmosphere other recruits took advantage of for their own benefit. If the NCAA didn't manufacture this new "special athlete" standard then nothing sticks to USC under the previous precedents set by the NCAA and their then existing rules.

So I don't care about the ramifications of illegal punishments handed out by an EX POST FACTO law which "retroactively alter the definition of a crime, retroactively increase the punishment for a criminal act, or punish conduct that was legal when committed. They are prohibited by Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, of the U.S. Constitution. An ex post facto law is considered a hallmark of tyranny because it deprives people of a sense of what behavior will or will not be punished and allows for random punishment at the whim of those in power."

Given the disparate treatment in the Cam Newton situation and the current Ohio State mess, this sums up the NCAA nicely.

Vacate the BCS?
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

USC's first time to be accused of providing extra benefits to players.


Here we go again. Apart from OJ Mayo, what benefits did USC provide? Does every Joe Blow who walks on campus suddenly represent the university?
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36112 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

It gets harder to argue you are doing everything you can to prevent agents getting to your star players

Nothing to do with coaching and recruiting.


only true if you think the same holds for boosters slipping players cash IMO

And I disagree with both scenarios.

If extra benefits are available the word gets around (as it does IMO about some boosters, or as it did IMO at tOSU about which car dealers or tattoo shops to frequent)

If players know there are extra benefits to be had... then the debate about whether it came from a booster or an agent is an academic one IMO... at least in apples to apples comparisons where the school has been negligent about preventing the benefits
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:44 pm to
The university failed to monitor the Joe Blows who did walk on campus, and what passed for a compliance office did their best imitation of an ostrich with it's head in the sand.

And I guess you missed the whole charge against the assistant coach who got the phone call from an agent, asking him to talk Bush about the money he owed him?

Again, providing extra benefits is not a new charge against USC. It's probably something the NCAA expects to see from your fans and boosters now.
Posted by ToesOnTheNose213
The present
Member since Oct 2007
2028 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Here we go again. Apart from OJ Mayo, what benefits did USC provide? Does every Joe Blow who walks on campus suddenly represent the university?

Zamoro, don't worry about him, he's obsessed. I'll give you $100 for every USC related thread TigersOfGold hasn't posted in. So here you go, here's your zero dollars.

It's not officially an SC thread until TOG and SouGent have posted in it.
Posted by SouGent
Sherman, TX
Member since Jul 2007
1966 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

It's not officially an SC thread until TOG and SouGent have posted in it.


Thank you so very much for the recognition!! It warms my heart to know my efforts have been appreciated!!

Oh, and while I'm here, I might as well point out USC cheated, got caught and have been justly punished, so DEAL WITH IT!!!

and all SC fans should remember that your program is only one Kiffin f*ck up away from DEATH!!!
This post was edited on 6/14/11 at 2:15 pm
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

all Tennessee fans should remember that your program is only one Kiffin f*ck up away from DEATH
FIFY. Using retroactive NCAA logic, of course.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

USC violated rules. therefore, they cheated. Not by any crazy standard, but by the dictionary definition of the word. USC cheated. We can argue over whether that cheating truly impacted the games, but it is undeniable they broke NCAA rules and regulations.
I don't know if I'd say they "cheated" since that involves active deception. USC's real crime is one of negligence. Either way, USC fans need to know that this is USC's problem and not the rest of the world's problem.
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21057 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 2:40 pm to
says the man who cut and ran as fast as he could

Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

says the man who cut and ran as fast as he could
I don't blame him. Who the hell could? If you're among the best at your profession, and your employer is doing a shitty job at maintaining a work environment where you can succeed, then it's perfectly reasonable for you to conclude that that employer doesn't deserve you and that it may be best for you to seek work elsewhere.

If Carroll was still coaching at USC, he would be ineligible to participate in the postseason; that means his team could go 9-0 in the Pac-12 this year and not even play in the P12CG.

OR he could go coach a team that could make the playoffs at 7-9. Once Carroll arrived in Los Angeles, he's done a great job for himself and has been nothing but successful. There's nothing not to admire.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

this is USC's problem and not the rest of the world's problem

Our days as violators in the NCAA's witch hunt are over. It's the rest of you that need to worry now.
Posted by SouGent
Sherman, TX
Member since Jul 2007
1966 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Our days as violators in the NCAA's witch hunt are over. It's the rest of you that need to worry now.


Is that so? As I said, your program is only one Kiffin f*ck up away from DEATH, which means it's only a matter of time because he WILL f*ck up!
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 3:45 pm to
This is like taxpayers siding with the IRS because they were lucky enough not to get audited...which happens randomly btw. It's really myopic how some people still see this off the field stuff as school vs. school, program vs. program. Leave it to the playing surface which is the only thing that matters. Otherwise you're just rewarding those that are better at (not getting caught) what you apparently despise "cheating."

So to simply say, USC had it coming...please; the way the NCAA is going, they would tell your program..."you all have it coming' kid."
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Zamoro, don't worry about him, he's obsessed. I'll give you $100 for every USC related thread TigersOfGold hasn't posted in. So here you go, here's your zero dollars.

It's not officially an SC thread until TOG and SouGent have posted in it.


Funny thing is, I can say the exact same thing about some of you USC fans in regards to negative threads about LSU. So blame LSUTANGERINE and others for inciting this kind of response by LSU fans.

The glaring difference, of course, is that LSU is in the spotlight for misdeeds a tiny, insignificant fraction of the time by comparison with USC. And always has been.

Which is something you guys just don't seem to get.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram