- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is NFL getting lazy with super bowl logos?
Posted on 2/3/15 at 6:32 am to Sellecks Moustache
Posted on 2/3/15 at 6:32 am to Sellecks Moustache
quote:
XLV didn't even have the host stadium on the logo , lazy uncreative fricks.
There's a version with the stadium...OP just didn't post it. When the NFL moved to the new logo system, they have a version with and without the stadium for different applications like national or regional marketing.
quote:
I heard that in response to all of the complaints, the NFL was going to change it up next year and just have one letter under Super Bowl.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 6:38 am
0
Posted on 2/3/15 at 8:19 am to LSULyle00690
it's on purpose and it looks like shite
instead of an individual and unique season we're watching a never ending soap opera
the individual logos were the best...my favorite is xxxvi
instead of an individual and unique season we're watching a never ending soap opera
the individual logos were the best...my favorite is xxxvi
Posted on 2/3/15 at 8:20 am to DelU249
The unique logos were better for the most part.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 8:21 am to LSULyle00690
I see no reason why there shouldn't be both the standard logo as well as an alternate local logo.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 8:30 am to ballscaster
You can thank Goodell for this. The logo is generic and bland, just like he is. He also changed the hunt and halas trophies to look like cheap light crap.
Fun fact: the last super bowl year with the original halas/hall trophies and unique logo was XLIV -- the Saints' year.
The lesson, as always -- Goodell sucks.
Fun fact: the last super bowl year with the original halas/hall trophies and unique logo was XLIV -- the Saints' year.
The lesson, as always -- Goodell sucks.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 8:33 am to Captain Want
quote:
He also changed the hunt and halas trophies to look like cheap light crap.
Seriously. What the frick was the point of changing the trophies?
Posted on 2/3/15 at 8:39 am to Captain Want
quote:
He also changed the hunt and halas trophies to look like cheap light crap.
This was a bigger issue for me. The new trophies are awful.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:08 am to Wally Sparks
kewl
lifeless and dull...not kewl
totally kewl
lifeless and dull...not kewl
totally kewl
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:14 am to DelU249
Goodell wanted to have everything look more similar -- halas/hunt, logo, lombardi. I think the title games have logos too. None of which was necessary. I loathe the new trophies, and hate that the logos are so damn generic. They look like some old video game logo.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:21 am to Captain Want
it just feels like a never ending game instead of a unique individual moment
superbowl 49...to be continued in super bowl 50
superbowl 49...to be continued in super bowl 50
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:23 am to Captain Want
and I agree, the George halas trophy was a beauty, now it looks like hot garbage
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:23 am to DelU249
Super Bowl XXXVI was supposed to be this logo before 9/11 prompted the change:
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:37 am to LSULyle00690
It's called branding, it's a good thing
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:54 am to LSULyle00690
If you knew anything about branding and marketing you'd know that uniformity and simpleness is key.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 9:56 am to LSULyle00690
If you go back and look at the old ones they all look very unique. Goddell needs to step his game up
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:40 am to tigerbait17
SB XLV was the first to use the new logo system...and they stuck to it with merchandise and everything:
After that game, they introduced a secondary logo and branding for the specific site and it was used sparingly for SB XLVI and has become a bit more prominent every game since, showing up a lot more on merchandise:
After that game, they introduced a secondary logo and branding for the specific site and it was used sparingly for SB XLVI and has become a bit more prominent every game since, showing up a lot more on merchandise:
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:43 am to Sellecks Moustache
quote:
XLV didn't even have the host stadium on the logo , lazy uncreative fricks.
NFL hates Jerry Jones.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:45 am to Captain Want
I think they have the same view as the NCAA re: generic NCAA tournament court designs...easier for branding or some shite.
Wish they woud go back to the unique courts especially with all the games televised now across different networks. Would be nice to tell which region or city you are looking at by the court design
Wish they woud go back to the unique courts especially with all the games televised now across different networks. Would be nice to tell which region or city you are looking at by the court design
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:56 am to RonFNSwanson
quote:
It's called branding, it's a good thing
Yeah, cause if there's anything the Super Bowl was lacking, it was visibility and public notoriety.
No one I know had any clue what the Super Bowl was prior to the uniform branding starting with XLV.
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:33 pm to Wayne Campbell
party on wayne
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News