- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I would love to know how a federal district court in NY
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:04 pm
...can grant a preliminary injunction that essentially operates to stay a ruling by the US Circuit Court of Appeals that has jurisdiction over the case.
Ezekiel Elliot suspension.
Ezekiel Elliot suspension.
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 10:13 pm
5
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:07 pm to udtiger
I dk man
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:08 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
That’s pretty much the best answer that’ll be given in this thread 
What tha hell is OP talking about? Pitino?
What tha hell is OP talking about? Pitino?
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:09 pm to udtiger
Law board...
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:12 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Law board...
There's a Law Board? I gotta get with that
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:14 pm to udtiger
I would love to know how a federal judge in Hawaii can override a Supreme Court ruling on immigration 2000 miles away but hey, apparently it can happen.
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:16 pm to udtiger
Nfl sued the NFLPA in NY to try and get the case moved there, like they did in the Brady case.
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:31 pm to udtiger
The federal circuit court held that the TX federal district court did not have jurisdiction over the case, so the injunction it granted Zeke was tossed.
Zeke then went to a federal district court in NY, which apparently is the proper jurisdiction, and filed a new case. I think that court has granted him a preliminary injunction, but I haven’t followed it closely.
I read that Zeke had tried to avoid the NY courts because they ruled against Tom Brady on similar claims. But after his TX case was tossed, he had no choice but to file in NY.
Zeke then went to a federal district court in NY, which apparently is the proper jurisdiction, and filed a new case. I think that court has granted him a preliminary injunction, but I haven’t followed it closely.
I read that Zeke had tried to avoid the NY courts because they ruled against Tom Brady on similar claims. But after his TX case was tossed, he had no choice but to file in NY.
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:41 pm to Twenty 49
Ah.
Makes sense.
Makes sense.
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:51 pm to udtiger
quote:not really seeing as he has absolutely zero chance of succeeding. They should automatically add two games for all this nonsense. The CBA is plain as can be and agreed to by both sides.
Makes sense.
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:56 pm to airfernando
quote:
not really seeing as he has absolutely zero chance of succeeding. They should automatically add two games for all this nonsense. The CBA is plain as can be and agreed to by both sides.
I agree this is getting ridiculous, it's only 6 games bro YOU WILL SERVE THEM AT ONE POINT regardless how much you litigate the procedural aspect of Art. 46 its the CBA its a bargained-for contract, its a legal document, the government isn't gonna intrude upon private contracts and read new provisions into it and I can guarantee SCOTUS certainly won't
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:00 pm to airfernando
quote:
not really seeing as he has absolutely zero chance of succeeding. They should automatically add two games for all this nonsense. The CBA is plain as can be and agreed to by both sides
I only meant the jurisdictional issue, not the ruling.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News