Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

How can a baseball team have more RBIs than runs

Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:05 am
Posted by RJL2
Bruno's Tavern
Member since Apr 2015
1933 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:05 am
The angels currently have 29 RBIs but only 23 runs per MLB.com

How is this possible?

Eta: never mind. Guy who made the spreadsheet pulled the data wrong
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 10:20 am
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:08 am to
Probably a mistake.

You can have Runs > RBI, but I can't think of a way you can have RBI > Runs.
Posted by RJL2
Bruno's Tavern
Member since Apr 2015
1933 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:10 am to
I was thinking the same thing but that's true for a few teams on MLB stats
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24940 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:10 am to
quote:

How can a baseball team have more RBIs than runs


It can't.

Also mlb.com shows Angels with 35 RBI and 35 Runs.
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26175 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:18 am to
Sounds like it's an error on the site's part because that's not possible.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95518 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:37 am to
You cant. But when you think about it, it really should be possible.

For example, baseball has no problem not giving you an RBI when you score hit in a run on a double play.

So, if I hit a double, and a guy on third doesnt score because he pulls a hamstring or drips over his dick, I should still get a RBI.
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13305 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:55 am to
Some of baseball's scoring rules are asinine.

They gave Teheran a Caught Stealing/Pickoff even though Freddie Freeman dropped the ball allowing the runner to get to 2nd. If the runner is not out, then it shouldn't be caught stealing.

I also don't like giving a strikeout to a pitcher for throwing a wild pitch that the catcher cannot handle allowing the runner to get to first. If you can't keep the ball in play for your catcher, then why do you get rewarded (stat-wise)?
Posted by FulshearTiger
Member since Jul 2015
5276 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:20 am to
quote:

also don't like giving a strikeout to a pitcher for throwing a wild pitch that the catcher cannot handle allowing the runner to get to first. If you can't keep the ball in play for your catcher, then why do you get rewarded (stat-wise)?

This is just dumb. The hitter still struck out. The pitcher also gets credit for a wild pitch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram