Started By
Message

ESPN Now Offering Streaming For $20 A Month

Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:38 pm
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:38 pm
this also includes TNT, TBS, CNN etc


RIP cable companies. Welcome to 2015.

LOL at the BIG for adding poverty schools like Rutgers and Maryland because in time those TV dollars are going to become peasantry.

My prediction: correct
Posted by Chillini
Member since Sep 2012
3153 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:39 pm to
No link?
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by auburnu008
I am the bagman
Member since Feb 2010
18528 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by Hat Tricks
Member since Oct 2003
28615 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

RIP cable companies


Most of the cable companies also provide the internet necessary to use this.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:44 pm to
Still too expensive


**in non-football times of the season.



No, actually too expensive period.

Do you know how much it costs to stream to people? Not much at all. Just need a server, encoder, and people to watch nodes (users) on trees that - HELP THE STREAM. That's right, most of the work is done by you and your computer.

No sense in paying $20 what is a really cheap...think, your cellphone can do this from GPS...imagine if hardwired.
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20245 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:44 pm to
Damn. Seriously don't know if there's a reason to have cable now
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53362 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:46 pm to
Yeah, you were ahead of the curve. Dan Wetzel for Yahoo also was saying what could kill the cash cow was a la carte packages. I think the typical response will be (I see hat trick already made the argument) that the cable/phone companies will somehow get you in the end by gouging you for the data/usage.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:46 pm to
Expensive, but it is a step in the right direction and still cheaper than the $100s people pay for cable TV packages.

I thought the eventual release would be about $10 a month, but this does include 10 channels.

Plus TNT which is great for NBA fans
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12008 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Damn. Seriously don't know if there's a reason to have cable now


Commercials have gotten to be so fricking bad. I can't believe how many car commercials I've seen watching bowl games the last few weeks.

That won't change, but my bill will.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

I think the typical response will be (I see hat trick already made the argument) that the cable/phone companies will somehow get you in the end by gouging you for the data/usage.


Valid arguments, however, one would think that eventually google fiber and similar services will become more mainstream nationally
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76519 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

LOL at the BIG for adding poverty schools like Rutgers and Maryland because in time those TV dollars are going to become peasantry.


So ESPN won't be offering conferences money based on viewers in a certain area any more?
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:52 pm to
How in the world is this too expensive? This plus a netflix subscription, and say the basic cable plus HBO package Cox has with their internet, I mean what else would you need?

That would all cost you about $120/month at most including internet and TV options.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 1:54 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110857 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

My prediction: correct
What was your prediction? Who didn't see this coming?
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51276 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:55 pm to
I only see ESPN and ESPN2 listed.

I don't see anything about SEC Network or ESPNU. College sports is the thing I care about the most.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53362 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:56 pm to
My understanding with Delany's moves is it's not so much about eyeballs in certain regions or ratings, but there is some rule where the B1G can shove a big dollar per subscriber fee to the cable carriers when a B1G team is in that state.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 1:58 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110857 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Most of the cable companies also provide the internet necessary to use this
As long as you pay full price for cable. This is a way to do it without cable.
Posted by Hat Tricks
Member since Oct 2003
28615 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

As long as you pay full price for cable. This is a way to do it without cable.


What?
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

So ESPN won't be offering conferences money based on viewers in a certain area any more?


of course they will, but the outrageous dollars they were offering will no longer be there; when more people decide cut the cord, there is less money to go around.

So the BIG will, in time, need to split less money among more programs (and that deserves a LOL)
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15180 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

what else would you need?


NBATV, FSNO, FS1
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram