Started By
Message

re: Cal - 2.5 at Nevada

Posted on 9/18/10 at 1:36 am to
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 1:36 am to
Clearly I touched a nerve. You're seriously comparing a ranked Cal squad to Ole Miss? Ole Miss was picked 10th or 11th IIRC in the SEC before the season.

And it's not like this is the first time the WAC has owned a Pac Ten team. It is the first time Ole Miss has lost to an FCS team.

Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12310 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 2:37 am to
quote:

You're seriously comparing a ranked Cal squad to Ole Miss?


Cal isn't ranked, they are a bad team this year.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260483 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 2:44 am to
quote:

Cal isn't ranked, they are a bad team this year.


Cal and Ole Miss would probably be a decent matchup this year. Losing to a FCS school is probably worse than losing to a mid level mid major IMO. But hell, there are degrees of losing so its virtually impossible to compare the two losses.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 4:11 am to
quote:

Cal isn't ranked, they are a bad team this year.




quote:

USA Today: Week 3


USA Today Ranking
Rank Team Record Pts Last Week
1. Alabama (55) 2-0 1470 1
2. Ohio St. (4) 2-0 1410 2
3. Boise St. 1-0 1278 3
4. Texas 2-0 1262 4
5. TCU 2-0 1168 5
6. Oregon 2-0 1122 8
7. Florida 2-0 1108 6
8. Nebraska 2-0 1095 7
9. Oklahoma 2-0 1062 10
10. Iowa 2-0 1050 9
11. Wisconsin 2-0 889 11
12. LSU 2-0 740 16
13. Arkansas 2-0 738 15
14. Utah 2-0 625 20
15. Auburn 2-0 618 20
16. South Carolina 2-0 527 25
17. Miami (FL) 1-1 417 12
18. Arizona 2-0 410 23
19. Stanford 2-0 338 NR
20. Penn St. 1-1 296 14
21. West Virginia 2-0 264 22
22. Michigan 2-0 254 NR
23. Houston 2-0 220 NR
24. California 2-1 131 NR
25. Missouri 2-0 82 NR
Others Receiving Votes:

* Clemson 68,
* Florida St. 63,
* Oklahoma St. 55,
* Air Force 51,
* Pittsburgh 50,
* Georgia 39,
* Michigan St. 35,
* Oregon St. 33,
* Texas Tech 28,
* Georgia Tech 26,
* North Carolina 23,
* BYU 17,
* Washington 14,
* Nevada 12,
* Cincinnati 11,
* Arizona St. 11,
* Boston Coll. 11,
* Northwestern 10,
* Fresno St. 9,
* Maryland 7,
* Texas A&M 7,
* Notre Dame 5,
* Connecticut 5,
* Virginia Tech 4,
* Kansas St. 3,
* Mississippi St. 2,
* Temple 1,
* East Carolina 1


Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 6:24 am to
An Ole Miss team that LSU can't seem to beat just lately got beaten at home by an FCS team.

So yeah, although no loss is ever a good loss, that's a really freaking bad one.

Oh, and also PAC 10 >>>>> SEC by your logic too.

Quack Quack.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 6:33 am to
quote:

Oh, and also PAC 10 >>>>> SEC by your logic too.


So how many of these does the Pac Ten have?



quote:

Quack Quack.


You'll be hearing that in your sleep soon enough.

Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 7:56 am to
quote:

You'll be hearing that in your sleep soon enough.
No shite.

As far as balls go, it is the ones in your undercarriage that matter, not the trophy case.

Speaking of which, USC has more legitimate football national championships than any SEC team not named Bama.

So take your Princess House and kiss my Trojan arse.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 7:59 am to
quote:

yes, cal is definitely on my shite list of teams to never bet on

No shite. Cal is schizophrenic as hell.
I am glad I did not bet on that game.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 8:01 am to
quote:

kiss my Trojan arse.


I prefer to flush my trojans after I use them.

Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 8:05 am to
You need Trojans to stoke your virility, apparently. For us, it is implicit.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 8:07 am to
quote:

You need Trojans to stoke your virility


To keep my "virility" from getting STD's, rather. Gotta watch out for those beavers.

This post was edited on 9/18/10 at 8:13 am
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158761 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 8:17 am to
glad I took nevada.....but explain to me how in the frick tedford hasn't replaced riley yet?
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51593 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 8:54 am to
quote:

glad I took nevada.....but explain to me how in the frick tedford hasn't replaced riley yet?



I did too. Cal is one of the most overrated programs in CFB right now. I take it Tedford must not have anybody else behind Riley. Tedfords been labeled this QB guru but he hasnt developed a good QB in years
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51593 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Clearly I touched a nerve. You're seriously comparing a ranked Cal squad to Ole Miss? Ole Miss was picked 10th or 11th IIRC in the SEC before the season.



No you did not. I was just using your logic. frick Cal, I dont have this conference pride nonsense some of you do. And know for a fact you didnt expect Ole Miss to lose. SEC fans were excited they had Masoli and were ready to compete. BTW I thought no team should be able to step on the field with an almighty SEC team
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 9:25 am to
another friday night four banger in the books

hit the tease again, realized cal was a very shitty play. barely hit the over in the southern miss game, but every other bet was an easy winner


back up on the year

and NW, i havent been around much but fact is you are still a huge fig
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 9/18/10 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Gotta watch out for those beavers.

This is true, dam them.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram