Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Atascocita HS (TX) would have won the Big Ten men's 4x100m final

Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:05 am
Posted by BeYou
DFW
Member since Oct 2012
6026 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:05 am
LINK


Atascocita HS would have won the Big Ten men's 4x100m final

1. Atascocita: 39.14
2. Iowa: 39.28
3. Nebraska: 39.31
This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 11:05 am
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79328 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:11 am to
Doesn't say much about the Big 10 Who are they recruiting exactly?
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36720 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:13 am to
quote:

39.14 - Atascocita
39.47 - Duncanville
39.79 - Galena Park North Shore
39.85 - Katy Tompkins



eastside pollution most be doing something
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36720 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:15 am to
also, the anchor is an LSU commit

LINK /
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42998 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:15 am to
the middle school club gymnastics team is probably good enough to win the women's NCAA gymnastics championship
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7778 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Who are they recruiting exactly?
There were way more guys who looked like intramural all-stars in the video of the B1G 4x100 than I expected.

Then again T&F is 12.6 to spread over 35-40 guys, so I guess it's not all that surprising to see a HS team in any number of states with better athletes.
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
47855 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:24 am to
THis may be true, but Big 10 Track is weak and has to focus on its inherit base. There isn't much speed in white people country so they hit harder the middle distance and distance and the field events. They cannot compete with the ACC and SEC in sprints. With only so many scholarships, they don't have a need to put too scholarship money in events they won't compete well in anyway.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60220 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:27 am to
I am surprised Iowa and Nebraska are the top two in the Big Ten instead of an Ohio State Penn State Maryland or Michigan
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
47855 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:28 am to
I noticed that first as well!
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
8448 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:38 am to
quote:

There were way more guys who looked like intramural all-stars in the video of the B1G 4x100 than I expected.


You could’ve just said white people
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9264 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:43 am to
Good thing there is more events in Track than just sprints then huh?
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
29322 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 12:09 pm to
I like how you’re inferring the Big 10 is actually strong at track and field I don’t recall the last big 10 program ive heard about at indoor or outdoor winning a national championship.

USC will help their reputation a good bit.

ETA: completely slipped my mind Oregon is going to the Big 10 also. They’ll sweep everything
This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 8:15 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47783 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Then again T&F is 12.6 to spread over 35-40 guys, so I guess it's not all that surprising to see a HS team in any number of states with better athletes.


It is though…

But let’s be honest this high school probably isn’t your average high school…
This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 6:37 pm
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33691 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 2:58 pm to
I mean the big 10 kinda sucks at track outside of some field events and distance. And even then only a couple programs even care about that.

By comparison that would’ve been 6th at SEC’s. Which is still insane
This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 3:01 pm
Posted by Krane
Member since Oct 2017
931 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

By comparison that would’ve been 6th at SEC’s

That’s more impressive easily
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23136 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 3:14 pm to
What's a good college time? like 38?
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5253 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

What's a good college time? like 38?


NCAA winning time is almost always 38.xx. 38 low is incredibly good and usually wins. Anything under 39 is probably top 10.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram