Started By
Message

Albert Breer: 4th and 15 onside kick proposal doesn't pass **EDIT** tabled

Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:02 pm
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77612 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:02 pm
per his twitter


ETA Pelissero clarifies

quote:

Tom Pelissero
@TomPelissero
·
25m
There was no official vote on the 4th-and-15 proposal, but they did take a (virtual) show of hands and it did not have the support to pass at this time. A bold idea that would've needed 24 of 32 votes. Expect it to come up again.


quote:

Three rules change proposals were approved:

2. Make permanent expansion of automatic replay reviews to include scoring plays/turnovers negated by foul

8. Expands defenseless player protection for KR/PR

9. Prevents manipulation of game clock with multiple deal-ball fouls


quote:

Also approved was the competition committee report, which includes a plan to test in the preseason expanded booth-to-official communication with certain objective info. A narrower change than the broad “sky judge” proposals that were withdrawn, but a notable step coaches support.
This post was edited on 5/28/20 at 1:38 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64667 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:03 pm to
good, was a dumb idea to begin with
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65497 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:07 pm to
nice to see the nfl stick to the core rules and not cave to the fantasy football nerds for once
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55478 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

good, was a dumb idea to begin with



I like it as an alternative choice (though maybe not just 15 yards), but it shouldn't preclude the use of an offside kick in any way.
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:08 pm to
Football is way too perfect, we really need to gimmick it up. It's what the people want.
Posted by GeauxAggie972
Poterbin Residence
Member since Aug 2009
29448 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:11 pm to
Not surprising. I would think it's a lot easier to convert that with the way offenses are going, than recover an onside kick, which needs far more to happen to be successful
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53398 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:13 pm to
Pass interference on that play would cause so many melts.
Posted by GeauxAggie972
Poterbin Residence
Member since Aug 2009
29448 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Pass interference on that play would cause so many melts.


Oh definitely or a defensive holding. I think there's way too many ways to convert that 4th and 15, where an onside kick doesn't have a penalty that really helps out
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Pass interference on that play would cause so many melts.


Limiting the # of attempts to 2 is also stupid. If a team wants to try a bunch of onside kicks, they should be allowed to.

The proposal would have also eliminated the surprise onside kick from the game, which is a rarely used but awesome thing.
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:25 pm to
I don't have a huge problem either way. You should be able to recover an onside kick to protect your lead. You should also be able to stop a team from getting 15 yards when you know they have to get 15 yards on one play.
Posted by Spelt it rong
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
10023 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:28 pm to
Good. If the team couldn't score enough points to prevent themselves from being in that situation, they deserve to have the odds against them in crunch time. 4th and 15 is a joke to so many teams. 4th and 25 on your own 2, now that's some tough shite.
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

4th and 15 is a joke to so many teams.


People keep saying this, but if it was so easy to pull off, why don't more teams go for it on 4th and 15.
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

People keep saying this, but if it was so easy to pull off, why don't more teams go for it on 4th and 15.


Risk/reward. In the typical onside kick situation you're almost certain to lose anyway, so failing to convert doesn't change anything really.

I don't care what the stats say, a 4th and 15 is easier to convert than an onside kick.

Your team actually practices 4th and 15 situations a lot, and you have the penalty bail out as an option.
This post was edited on 5/28/20 at 1:38 pm
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77612 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:38 pm to
OP edited. The change has been tabled for further discussion.
Posted by Dr. 3
Member since Mar 2005
11353 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:44 pm to
Eisen said yesterday automatic first down penalties stay the same. Some chickenshit illegal contact penalty moves the chains. That aint right.
Posted by Spelt it rong
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
10023 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

People keep saying this, but if it was so easy to pull off, why don't more teams go for it on 4th and 15.

Come on. It's all about the situation, and you know that. Not many teams are put in a 4th and 15 for starters, and generally the ones that are, are not the teams I think would be able to convert very easily. All this rule would do is give the really good teams that are having a slight off day the chance to prevent upsets.
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

automatic first down penalties


I'm in favor of abolishing ALL automatic first down penalties.

A 3rd and 20 shouldn't become a 1st and 10 because of a 5 yard peantly, ever.

Enforce the yardage, if it produces a first down, so be it. If it doesn't, it doesn't.
Posted by lsuguy13
RIP MATT
Member since Mar 2004
9509 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:53 pm to
Nothing to do with fantasy

Impossible to get an onside kick with new rules. Something gotta happen
Posted by Spelt it rong
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
10023 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

A 3rd and 20 shouldn't become a 1st and 10 because of a 5 yard peantly, ever.

I agree, but teams will intentionally hold/interfere. Refs won't call it every time.

I wish they'd get rid of the spot foul on PI.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141180 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

9. Prevents manipulation of game clock with multiple deal-ball fouls

a Bill Belichick special
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram