- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2 weeks in a row someone ejected for hitting Penn St Kicker
Posted on 10/8/16 at 2:51 pm to CajunsTigersSaints
Posted on 10/8/16 at 2:51 pm to CajunsTigersSaints
wish someone would do that to the wisky kicker when he does his silly dance. Hopefully next year when he's healthy again
0
Posted on 10/8/16 at 2:54 pm to BoardReader
Why did he get ejected for that?
Posted on 10/8/16 at 2:57 pm to Eighteen
Because it was a flagrant hit that occurred well after the play was over. Questioning the ejection (this week or last week) is ignorant at best.
Posted on 10/8/16 at 3:21 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
That hit that late on anyone when the ball was kicked out of bounds will get you ejected. You can't be serious.
Watch the video. The crow reacts almost simultaneously with the whistle that you an hear, so I don't believe it was as last as you're suggesting. Also, the guy that hit him is the first line of defense so he's not turned around the entire time watching the kick go out of bounds like the other guys.
It was probably late, but the ejection is the part I don't get. I 100% convinced there would be no ejection if it was anyone other than the kicker.
This was last week and it wasn't that late either. Other people are engaged too.
This week.
Posted on 10/8/16 at 3:23 pm to slackster
I'm fine with this becoming a weekly thing.
Posted on 10/8/16 at 3:25 pm to slackster
FWIW, an ejection is applicable for a flagrant foul, defined as:
If the kicker was a DE no one would deem he was at risk of catastrophic injury.
quote:
ARTICLE 3. A flagrant personal foul is illegal physical contact so extreme or deliberate that it places an opponent in danger of catastrophic injury.
If the kicker was a DE no one would deem he was at risk of catastrophic injury.
Posted on 10/8/16 at 3:44 pm to slackster
Neither hit warrants an ejection. I didnt see the first one live, but it didn't even look like flag. The second one, sure, 15 yards but he only got kicked out because he hit a fat arse kicker.
Posted on 10/8/16 at 3:59 pm to slackster
i watched the video. That hit is completely unnecessary and flagrant. Should be an ejection every time. Arguing against it is just typical you.
Posted on 10/8/16 at 4:01 pm to BamaSaint
quote:
Neither hit warrants an ejection. I didnt see the first one live, but it didn't even look like flag. The second one, sure, 15 yards but he only got kicked out because he hit a fat arse kicker.
You're ignoring that the hits occur when the plays are dead. Saying it's not even a flag just makes you look clueless.
Posted on 10/8/16 at 6:11 pm to wildtigercat93
So basically he acts like Jamal Adams?
Posted on 10/8/16 at 6:15 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
i watched the video. That hit is completely unnecessary and flagrant. Should be an ejection every time. Arguing against it is just typical you.
I'm arguing the ejection is the result of it being a kicker. I'm not arguing it is against the letter of the law nor am I suggesting it wasn't a penalty. Do you honestly believe that would be an ejection if you hit a DT like that?
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News