Started By
Message

The White House supports studying a financial transaction tax (0.1% tax on stocks)

Posted on 2/21/21 at 8:40 pm
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31051 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 8:40 pm
LINK

quote:

The White House supports studying the merits of a financial transaction tax — a move favored by progressives and despised by Wall Street — in the wake of the GameStop trading frenzy.


quote:

A 0.1% tax on stock, bond and derivative transactions could raise $777 billion for the federal government over a decade, according to a 2018 estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
However, such a tax would face fierce opposition from Wall Street and it's unclear whether moderate Democrats would support it. Opponents warn it would backfire on retail investors by raising costs and making financial markets less liquid.
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 8:43 pm
Posted by wileyjones
Member since May 2014
2298 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 8:43 pm to
frick any tax
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 8:44 pm to
frick them
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82031 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 8:51 pm to
For fricks sakes man
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
3551 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 8:59 pm to
I had a conversation with a reasonably intelligent co worker today where he stated that taxes won’t go up under Biden unless you make “like 400k a year.”













Yeah.......
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48955 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 9:05 pm to
This is just the beginning
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 9:07 pm to
How about they stop spending
Posted by Zachary
Member since Jan 2007
1636 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 9:14 pm to
They don't believe your property is your property. Illegitimate elections have consequences.
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13104 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 9:16 pm to
If there was a way to limit this to HFT hedge funds doing billions of trades annually, I’d consider that in exchange for indexing capital gains to inflation.
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10400 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 9:27 pm to
I wouldn't trust a Democrat as far as I see them. You have to be completely brainwashed to be a Democrat these days.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72671 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

You have to be completely brainwashed to be a Democrat these days.




you have plenty of those idiots who post here!

Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
5985 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 6:19 am to
Think about the actual ins and outs of a policy like this.. Your 401ks, ETFs, IRAs and the huge funds that hold pensions, etc. would have to pay a tax each time they reposition. This isn't just going to just hurt the small retail investors and it would almost assuredly blow the market up.

This and the unrealized cap gains tax are two of the dumbest policies I've ever heard of being proposed.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 6:32 am to
They will just give it to people who have done absolutely nothing to earn it
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15311 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 6:50 am to
This is what happens when you vote for an extreme authoritarian government. This isnt a great nation anymore just a clown show.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73742 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 7:05 am to
Congratulations Want Brigade


But the color orange was so bad
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119181 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 7:49 am to
Elections have consequences. Taxes are going up as much as possible. Have to pay for the stimulus, you know, instead of cutting taxes to actually stimulate the economy.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Elections have consequences. Taxes are going up as much as possible. Have to pay for the stimulus, you know, instead of cutting taxes to actually stimulate the economy.

Let's keep the election commentary on the poliboard. We've been doing this dump stimulus into the economy regardless of party lines for as long as I remember. Someone was eventually gonna have to pay for it although this policy makes no sense to me. Seems like the best place to get the money would be to reduce tax breaks and plug loopholes in our current system isn't of inventing new taxes
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16503 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Let's keep the election commentary on the poliboard.


This seems like a reasonable place to discuss the implications of a tax on stock trades to me
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73742 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 8:24 am to
quote:

This seems like a reasonable place to discuss the implications of a tax on stock trades to me



He/she is one of the posters who voted for this type of tax

Of course he/she wants to avoid any of that talk
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 2/22/21 at 8:59 am to
quote:

This seems like a reasonable place to discuss the implications of a tax on stock trades to me

Sure let's discuss the implications as I said I wish they'd look elsewhere and others said the market will react negatively to this happening because of the cash cost to not just smaller but larger institutions. Let's dive deeper please provide your detailed analysis.

Bitching that Dems or Republicans either one spends too much is poliboard Fodder. both parties overreach, spend too much ,and interfere with the markets unnecessarily.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram