- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Roth Income Limits and Backdoor
Posted on 1/19/24 at 10:35 pm to Nu Iota Prophet
Posted on 1/19/24 at 10:35 pm to Nu Iota Prophet
quote:
Wait. I'm confused but definitely appreciate this tread. I contributed with after tax money $7k in 2020 and 2021. Total of $14k. I always thought, not sure why, that those funds are technically treated like a Roth as it's taxed funds. As such, I've simply left it alone thinking I could pull it tax free at retirement.
Sorry man. Not the way it works.
quote:
Seems that my logic is flawed. That being said, if I wanted to backdoor the full $14k plus gains on it, what am I looking at? Am I hit with this Pro Rata tax that I'm discovering in this conversation?
You’ll pay taxes on the gains when you convert. Pretty simple.
Posted on 1/19/24 at 11:48 pm to Nu Iota Prophet
quote:
Are you hit with the prorata each time you do it?
No, because I never had or have any money in my trad ira except the few days a year it takes to clear before I can convert.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 12:46 am to STLhog
quote:
Can someone lay out how to do the backdoor Roth process as if I were a 5 year old child?
Make contribution to Traditional IRA that is not tax deductible. As soon as possible, convert those funds to a Roth IRA. IRS says you have to pay taxes on any of the pre-tax portion that you convert, but since all of the money is after-tax (since it wasn’t deductible), you’re home free.
It’s a little bit more complicated if you have ANY money in ANY traditional IRA that is pre-tax.
Side note - many employer retirement plans offer the ability to make after tax contributions to those plans as well. That can create opportunities for “super” backdoor Roth conversions. You basically rollout the after tax money from the 401k to a Roth while you’re working. Always worth checking into with your 401k provider.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 8:53 am to evil cockroach
quote:
Subtle brag is subtle
Fair, fair, but it’s pretty easy to knock me down a peg just by taking a Zillow screenshot around Nashville.
Then it feels like I’m gonna be house poor, a perpetual renter, or spend a minimum of 90 minutes to 2 hours commuting most days.
I could look for other metros, but I’m in healthcare management, so I’d probably be looking at a big pay cut then.
I can’t complain much, but I’m not sure I would have put in all the hours working I did growing up for what the payoff looks like it will be.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 9:25 am to slackster
quote:
Side note - many employer retirement plans offer the ability to make after tax contributions to those plans as well. That can create opportunities for “super” backdoor Roth conversions. You basically rollout the after tax money from the 401k to a Roth while you’re working. Always worth checking into with your 401k provider.
Can you explain this further? How am I saving more taxes this way?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 9:39 am to TomRollTideRitter
Move to East Nashville.
I made 75% in two years over there living in a nice house next to a bunch of shitty houses. Did it right around your age.
Find a spot that hasn’t completely “turned” and you won’t regret it.
Then you can move wherever you want. Definitely easier back then but you can still do it.
I made 75% in two years over there living in a nice house next to a bunch of shitty houses. Did it right around your age.
Find a spot that hasn’t completely “turned” and you won’t regret it.
Then you can move wherever you want. Definitely easier back then but you can still do it.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 9:39 am to baldona
quote:
Can you explain this further? How am I saving more taxes this way?
You can essentially save in a 401k 4 ways - pre tax contributions, Roth contributions, employer contributions, and after tax contributions.
In the first two you can save up to $23,000 between the two. Your employer contributions and your after tax contributions could theoretically be as high as $69,000 (all contributions to a 401k from your combined sources have to under that limit if you’re younger than 50).
Hopefully pre tax (traditional) and Roth 401k tax savings now and later are understandable.
As for after tax contributions, they allow you to get more money into a Roth IRA each year since many plans allow you to rollover the after tax portion while you’re still working. It’s eligible to be rolled over into a Roth IRA.
I personally max out traditional 401k contributions, then max out after tax (which is around $12,000 with my employer), then backdoor Roth.
I’d save all of it pre-tax if I could, given my marginal rate, but I can’t do that. Saving it tax free in the future is the next best thing compared to a plain taxable brokerage account.
Hopefully that makes sense.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 9:45 am to slackster
This is helpful but I’m still missing the basics I think.
23,000 401k (is that my contribution or combined with employer)
7,500 Traditional, then converted to Roth.
That’s way less than 69,000.
You adding joint for spouse 401?
23,000 401k (is that my contribution or combined with employer)
7,500 Traditional, then converted to Roth.
That’s way less than 69,000.
You adding joint for spouse 401?
Posted on 1/20/24 at 10:17 am to STLhog
quote:
23,000 401k (is that my contribution or combined with employer)
That’s yours. Employer is a separate bucket.
quote:
7,500 Traditional, then converted to Roth.
7,000 if you’re under 50. 8,000 if you’re over. If you’re over 50, the 401k limit for your pre-tax/Roth contributions is $30,500.
That being said, your traditional IRA and Roth IRA contributions are irrelevant to the 401k buckets.
quote:
That’s way less than 69,000.
Yeah, and most employers aren’t that generous so the $69k cap never comes into play. They also do not have to offer after tax options, but many do.
A lot of confusion comes from the words being used interchangeably. Contributions, rollovers, and conversions all mean very different things and have very different rules.
Your new, out of pocket or paycheck money going into a 401k or an IRA is a contribution and has a limit on it. For 2024 it is $23,000 for pre-tax/Roth 401k, theoretically as high as $69,000 on after tax 401k (in practice it’s never this high because the other contributions eat away at the $69k combined cap - if you put $23k in pre tax 401k, and assuming no employer contributions, you could put $46k after tax at best), and $7,000 for traditional/Roth IRA.
Generally, a rollover is uncapped and is movement from two retirement accounts that do not have the same account type. Moving from a 401k to an IRA is a rollover, and is a reportable transaction to the IRS. Whether or not it’s taxable as well depends on the type of rollover. You can rollover Pre tax 401k to traditional IRA and pay no taxes, or to a Roth IRA and pay taxes on all of it at once. You can rollover Roth 401k to Roth IRA and pay no taxes. You can rollover after tax contributions to a Roth IRA, but you have to also deal with any earnings on those contributions. The earnings can be rolled into a traditional IRA without paying taxes, or you can roll it into a Roth and pay the taxes on the earnings.
For example, if you contribute $10k to after tax 401k, and it’s worth $10k when you roll it over, you just roll it into a Roth IRA and you’re good. You can typically do this immediately in the plan, even while you’re working. If you contribute $10k and it’s worth $12k when you roll it over, you can either roll the $10k to Roth and $2k to traditional IRA, abounding any immediate tax liability, or roll the entire balance to a Roth IRA and pay taxes on the $2k at that time as a conversion. The growth on the after-tax amount while it’s in the 401k is treated as pre-tax money (same as it would be if you made nondeductible contributions to a traditional IRA). For this reason, it is typically a good idea to roll them over to Roth options as quickly as possible. In the case of the typical backdoor Roth, it’s a conversion of the nondeductible amount, not a rollover.
That leads us to conversions, which is the process of taking pre-tax money, paying taxes on it, and converting it to Roth accounts where it’s presumably never taxed again. These are also uncapped. You can convert as much as you’d like in any given year.
One other quirk- some 401k plans allow what’s called in plan Roth conversions. This allows you to convert your after tax contributions to your Roth 401k inside of the plan without doing a rollover to a Roth IRA.
Whether any of this is a good idea depends on your individual situation and what your plan allows, but hopefully that clears some things up.
Posted on 1/21/24 at 8:54 am to slackster
I have a related question but don't think it's worth it's own thread. I plan to work in 2 different states for the first and 2nd half of the year and the 2nd state has a higher tax rate than the first.
Should I contribute only to the Roth at first and hold off on the traditional 401k contributions until I start working in the 2nd state with the higher rate? Or will this be "trued up" when filing my tax return next year and end up making no difference?
I guess I would also need to confirm with my employer that it wouldn't affect my employer match.
Should I contribute only to the Roth at first and hold off on the traditional 401k contributions until I start working in the 2nd state with the higher rate? Or will this be "trued up" when filing my tax return next year and end up making no difference?
I guess I would also need to confirm with my employer that it wouldn't affect my employer match.
This post was edited on 1/21/24 at 8:55 am
Posted on 1/21/24 at 11:33 am to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
Should I contribute only to the Roth at first and hold off on the traditional 401k contributions until I start working in the 2nd state with the higher rate? Or will this be "trued up" when filing my tax return next year and end up making no
Probably not going to make a difference. Depends on the state and their tax forms.
Most state tax forms use the federal agi which already accounts for the 401k contributions prior to assessing state tax.
Posted on 1/21/24 at 11:50 am to Puffoluffagus
quote:
Probably not going to make a difference. Depends on the state and their tax forms. Most state tax forms use the federal agi which already accounts for the 401k contributions prior to assessing state tax
This. For one single year it’s also probably not worth the hassle.
Posted on 1/21/24 at 12:17 pm to slackster
Helpful. Thanks big dog.
Posted on 1/21/24 at 12:23 pm to TomRollTideRitter
quote:
almost seemed like I had to be missing something for it to be that easy
I still feel that way too. The rule is absurd.
"Don't you dare contribute to this Roth IRA if you make over this amount. If you do, your ONLY option is a traditional IRA. And fine we'll let you immediately transfer that to a Roth IRA seconds later."
Posted on 1/21/24 at 7:50 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
rollover or two that messes the conversion up.
These rules are bullshite. The taxation on retirement is the petfect example of why I don't even want the gov walking my dog
Posted on 1/21/24 at 9:28 pm to slackster
If I contribute $7,000 cash to a Trad IRA, can I move that cash then immediately to the Roth or does that cash need to be used to purchase something first then that something immediately moved to Roth?
Posted on 1/21/24 at 9:40 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:
If I contribute $7,000 cash to a Trad IRA, can I move that cash then immediately to the Roth or does that cash need to be used to purchase something first then that something immediately moved to Roth?
Immediate. The contribution to the traditional IRA is the key. Buying something is irrelevant once it’s already in the trad IRA vehicle.
Immediate I guess is relative, as some custodians require some type of settlement, but as soon as possible it is allowed. Sooner the better as you don’t want appreciation in the account.
Posted on 1/21/24 at 11:34 pm to TomRollTideRitter
quote:
Reading through this rule, it seems like I should not try to take any Traditional IRA deductions if I’m planning to just backdoor the Roth every year.
Yes.
But what typically trips people up is not that.
What trips people up is their Rollover IRA.
Because a Rollover IRA is treated as a Traditional IRA.
Even though it came from your 401(k).
Many people who make enough money to be ineligible to contribute to a Roth, also have a Rollover IRA.
Posted on 2/10/24 at 7:36 am to slackster
I have a traditional rollover IRA so looks like backdoor is off the table for me and my current 401k investment options suck so I’d prefer to keep my IRA.
My wife doesn’t have a traditional IRA. She could do a backdoor Roth in her name and that would not trigger pro rata tax, right?
My wife doesn’t have a traditional IRA. She could do a backdoor Roth in her name and that would not trigger pro rata tax, right?
Posted on 2/12/24 at 7:55 am to 98eagle
quote:
The pro rata rule only applies to your traditional taxable IRA to determine how much tax you owe on the amount you converted to Roth. Example 1: You have $100,000 in a traditional IRA and it is 100% taxable. You have a Roth IRA with any amount. You can convert any or all of your Traditional IRA into your Roth. The amount you convert to Roth is taxable income. Example 2: You have $100,000 in a traditional IRA and it is 80% taxable and 20% after tax. You have a Roth IRA with any amount. You can convert any or all of your Traditional IRA into your Roth. The amount you convert to Roth is taxable income for 80% of the amount you converted. In summary, you can convert as much of your Traditional IRA to Roth IRA as you want to in any tax year. You just pay normal unearned income taxes for the taxable amounts you converted.
How would one have a traditional IRA that is 80% taxable and 20% non-taxable? I thought you pay taxes on 100% of a traditional IRA’s distributions? Am I dumb or missing something?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News