Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Investment Scorecard - YTD

Posted on 5/10/13 at 5:57 pm
Posted by matthew25
Member since Jun 2012
9425 posts
Posted on 5/10/13 at 5:57 pm
My 6 bond funds: 1.15%. Best is PTCIX @ 3.44; worst is VIPSX @ -.96.

My 5 balanced funds: 5.53%. Best is Vanguard Wellington @ 10.52; worst is FASIX @ 3.06.

My 6 equity funds: 16.55%. Best is Vanguard Health @ 20.47; worst is VDAIX at 14.97.

S&P is up 14.55% and Dow 15.37% YTD

When the fed turns off the money flow, my bonds will all be short-term. WSJ has article up now re: stopping the flow.
This post was edited on 5/11/13 at 9:13 pm
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 5/10/13 at 6:12 pm to
This might be a good place to ask. Starting a vanguard Roth. Star fund or 2050 target fund for my initial 3000?

Thanks
This post was edited on 5/10/13 at 6:17 pm
Posted by Siderophore
Member since Nov 2010
3338 posts
Posted on 5/10/13 at 8:48 pm to
I would actually put it in their strategic equity fund first and then flesh out your portfolio.

One thing I'm doing with my long term approach is that while target date fund is a significant portion of retirement funds, it's not the primary.

I'm shooting for around 40% allocation into it.

Why?

1) I don't want to have the fund have the majority of my money (a tempting prospect as its designed as a hands off one fund option) as when it shifts allocation later in life, it will do so with no consideration of the market at the time. Might sell stocks when they are low to buy bonds when they are high.

2) I don't feel my retirement money should go that heavily conservative allocation at start of retirement. But you obviously have a need for a portion of your nest egg conservatively allocated. I'm putting enough aside that the conservate target date funds will last for at least 10 years with no additional funding. I will trickle from more aggressive stocks and holdings into that conservative income fund as I see fit.

Strategic equity is a better fit for this because of the more appropriate allocation (STAR is 40% bonds and you are too young to be that heavily into them) with a lower expense ratio to boot.

Don't be fooled by the similar returns, STAR is inflated by the low interest rates which won't last long term.

If you look prior to the 2008 crash to 2001, STAR yielded 7.4% and strategic equity yeilded 11.4%
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 5/10/13 at 8:51 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram