Started By
Message

Employer Offering Roth 401K

Posted on 7/12/23 at 6:48 pm
Posted by JusTrollin
Member since Oct 2016
230 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 6:48 pm
I understand Roth 401k money is post tax, however the contribution limit is the same for Roth and traditional. Is the Roth limit $22,500 pre-tax then that amount gets taxed per income and I end up with the after tax amount to grow tax free?

Or is it $22,500 limit after I’ve paid the tax? That would mean I’m contributing more to retirement than a traditional right?
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28813 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 6:52 pm to
No matter how you slice it 22.5K goes in to the account.
Posted by JusTrollin
Member since Oct 2016
230 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 7:01 pm to
So you’re saying I’m saving more by doing the Roth since it’s all my money and I won’t lose any to tax upon withdrawal?
Posted by GeauxTigers777
Member since Oct 2007
1572 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 7:13 pm to
You will not have to pay taxes on withdrawal, but you will pay more in taxes now. Therefore, it will take up more of your salary currently, but will grow tax free overtime. It depends on your tax bracket to know which one makes more sense.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28813 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 7:24 pm to
Without knowing your tax bracket now or in the future it is hard to say. It comes down to paying the tax man now or later. Either way 22,500 is invested in your account.
This post was edited on 7/12/23 at 7:25 pm
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1423 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

So you’re saying I’m saving more by doing the Roth since it’s all my money and I won’t lose any to tax upon withdrawal?



Not that simple.

https://thefinancebuff.com/case-against-roth-401k.html
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1423 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 7:30 pm to
Also many people don't realize that if you go trad 401k; you can still convert that to Roth in the future. Which is really good option, if you can do it in low income years/retiring early.

Posted by JusTrollin
Member since Oct 2016
230 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 8:10 pm to
Wife and I do about 250k combined currently. I max out a traditional 401k. She maxes an hsa and does about 8-9k in a Roth 401k.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71104 posts
Posted on 7/12/23 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Without knowing your tax bracket now or in the future it is hard to say.


Exactly.

You'll likely be in a lower tax bracket when you retire, but there's no way to be sure.

Posted by bubba102105
Member since Aug 2017
443 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 7:40 am to
Not to highjack this thread but I moved to the roth 401k option a couple years ago with the mindset if I can afford the taxes now I might as well to get the tax free growth and no other info other than that.

40 years old, AGI last year was 161k. I'll have a pension that will be worth somewhere between $70-80k a year, so that combined with my 401k I'm projected to be somewhere in the 180-190k/year range come my projected retirement at 60. That doesn't include my va disability which is another $25k a year.

All that being said is roth the right option for me or should I go traditional and contribute a little more from those tax savings?
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
5318 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 8:08 am to
quote:

You will not have to pay taxes on withdrawal, but you will pay more in taxes now. Therefore, it will take up more of your salary currently, but will grow tax free overtime. It depends on your tax bracket to know which one makes more sense.


So help me understand this part. You assume your salary is going to go up. But with the future being ambiguous, is it not a smarter strategy to invest in a ROTH account while your income level allows it, and if/once your income gets too high, move to a traditional IRA/401K? Seems like a hedged bet in the future without knowing what the future looks like.
Posted by Dav
Dhan
Member since Feb 2010
8073 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 8:27 am to
quote:

So help me understand this part. You assume your salary is going to go up. But with the future being ambiguous, is it not a smarter strategy to invest in a ROTH account while your income level allows it, and if/once your income gets too high, move to a traditional IRA/401K? Seems like a hedged bet in the future without knowing what the future looks like.


This is my understanding. I started a job five years ago with a Roth 401k option. Prior jobs my only option was traditional. I'm currently 33 years old. My salary has increased year-to-year. I would rather pay the taxes now than later when I am presumably in a much higher tax bracket. Then I could switch to a traditional.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
209 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 9:16 am to
Look at your present top marginal tax rate and your expected top marginal tax rate in retirement. IF you are in a 32% tax bracket now but expect to be in a 22% tax bracket in retirement, put most of your money in a traditional 401K and a little in a Roth. If you put it all in a Roth, you are paying 32% (or more) now to avoid paying 22% later.

This is the way it works for most people, but some people have different situations.

Roth's offer tax flexibility, but it may come with a price as shown above, but it would seem like a good thing to have some Roth assets so that if you decide you want a new car when you are 80, pulling 100K out of the Roth to pay for it won't drive you up to a higher tax bracket.

So in my opinion, for most people, plan on saving in traditional 401K to provide retirement income and plan on Roth for unplanned or unscheduled or otherwise irregular large retirement expenditures.

Maybe a 70/30 % split between the two would be best for most people. Some people have totally different situations.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25602 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 11:22 am to
I expect that I'm in a higher tax bracket now than in retirement.

However, I use every economic downturn to thrust money into Roth.

I call it buying on-sale with funds growing tax free with a quick 20%+ bump in equity.
I also increase my contribution percentage until the market recovers (or I max out).
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
1164 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 8:12 am to
Good advice. Having tax flexibility is important. Many unknowns in the future. I am retired from working, but an active investor. I wish I had more Roth money now. Going to get slammed this year because of a large purchase being funded with a chunk of standard 401k money.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16397 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Maybe a 70/30 % split between the two would be best for most people.

And when considering this split, be mindful that any company match is typically in a traditional since you are not paying taxes on the match.

Also, when considering the tax bracket questions/concerns now vs when you retire; I have been advised you can't just look at the tax rate that may be applicable on those funds. If you are going to receive SS benefits, the amount of those benefits you will be taxed on will be affected by your taxable income. Your healthcare options/costs are also affected by your taxable income. And Roth plans are not subjected to required minimum distribution amounts.
Posted by PlanoPrivateer
Frisco, TX
Member since Jan 2004
2796 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 9:31 am to
quote:

And Roth plans are not subjected to required minimum distribution amounts.


I'm glad you mentioned this because it is an important point that isn't always bought up in these discussions. Having to take more in RMDs than you want to can put you in a higher marginal tax bracket. Your other points are spot on as well.
Posted by Tifway419
Member since Sep 2022
827 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I wish I had more Roth money now. Going to get slammed this year because of a large purchase being funded with a chunk of standard 401k money.

I split my contributions in both, with the thinking that I’d pull from my Roth in years where I make big purchases and pull more Roth money in December to fund living expenses for the following year. The next year, I’ll only pull traditional money to remain in the lower tax brackets.

Am I thinking of this the correct way?
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25602 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 11:57 am to
I think you are stating the plan backwards.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25602 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

pull more Roth money in December to fund living expenses for the following year.

Generally, the thought is to pull from traditional to cap out the current tax bracket (funds can be used for the following years).

If you won't use the funds in 5 years, the thought is to do rollover from traditional into Roth to cap out income within the current tax bracket.

quote:

The next year, I’ll only pull traditional money to remain in the lower tax brackets.

The Roth doesn't show on income tax statements, so it is generally used to remain in low tax brackets.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram