Why should there be a Repeat?

I read about Alabama players Maze/Hanks feels that they were the better team and that they would beat LSU if there is a Repeat. I know Bama is hoping for that. But I say why should they get that opporunity. They lost the game, period. Both Teams had outstanding Defense, which everybody in the country knew that it was going to be a Defensive battle and it was. College Football is played for 60 minutes and the team that makes the least amount of mistakes, has good coaching, good special teams and capitalizes on the other teams mistakes should win the game. I know that is not always the case, but it was this time. Bama has good kickers; but they choked five times. How those kickers perform is part of coaching. Why was Saban kicking the long field goals when he could have put LSU in the cellar on there end of the field and his defense could have made a big difference. After 60 minutes and a overtime LSU did the necessary things with good coaching to win the game. It's not who could have one, should have won, or has the best team to win. What counts is the box score at the end of the game and who came out on top. I have seen the better teams lose all the time. What counts is the box score at the end of the game and who is on top. So why should Bama get a repeat...which could happen if Ok State and Stanford don't take care of business.