Started By
Message

re: why is WWL reporting Lee to start ?

Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:06 pm to
Posted by rossman
Member since Dec 2003
907 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:06 pm to
I heard the same WWL report. It was Christian Garrick's daily sports report.....which in most cases are completely wrong. Seriously, some of the stuff he says in his reports makes even the casual sports enthusiast scratch his head.

To support his statement that Lee would start, Garrick inserted a clip of Bobby discussing what BOBBY would do with the quarterback situation....so that clip makes no sense at all.
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:15 pm
Posted by WelcomeToDeathValley
1st & 1st
Member since Aug 2006
16947 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

logic



does not compute, its Lesticles were talking about here
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16760 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

What gives you the confidence to start a quarterback who is statistically the worst in the NCAA and what message does this send the team about on field performance dictating playing time.

He just stared at me like he hated me said uh...for about two seconds then said that JJ is the reason that Ridley is leading the SEC in rushing but Lee competes hard in practice or some shite.


well done!

He's way too used to sunshine pumpers being there.

Of course he had no answer because its logically unjustifiable.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10234 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:13 pm to
One of the lineman simply had enough and was pushed into JJ's leg somehow at practice.
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:14 pm to
The problem with the stats is JJ just happened to be on the field when Ridley broke his two big runs.

1 was the first play of a drive where Ridley made a great cut.

The second was on a 2nd and 2 in the 3rd where he made another great move.

It had nothing to do with JJ. Take those 2 runs out and the numbers are almost identical between when the two QBs are in.

With JJ:
9 for 34 yards

With Lee:
11 for 39 yards

That isn't that big of a deal. Given the fact Ridley lost a huge run on the first drive Lee was in because of Barksdale's hold, I'd say the numbers aren't that different.

In the end, Les will do what Les is going to do. We just have to accept that even if it means failure for this team.
Posted by TiegerTim
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2007
2973 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

is WWL reporting Lee to start ?
What gives you the confidence to start a quarterback who is statistically the worst in the NCAA and what message does this send the team about on field performance dictating playing time.

He just stared at me like he hated me said uh...for about two seconds then said that JJ is the reason that Ridley is leading the SEC in rushing but Lee competes hard in practice or some shite.
this type of crap is just one of the reasons that I strongly dislike Less....
Posted by Live2CTigersWin
Member since May 2010
1664 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

WWL reported this morning that JJ was starting. Maybe hurt in practice?


Maybe one of the DL players hate to see JJ start, that's why he tried to injure JJ in pratice, maybe???
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:26 pm to
maybe Lex Luther kidnapped the president and jordan had to go save the day.
Posted by JW1LL
Beaumont, TX
Member since Sep 2010
317 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:27 pm to
who cares. everyone is trying to mash numbers. its pretty simple. when you have a threat to run, alot of times you will "spy" that qb with a defensive player. blitzes are more conservative. it doesnt matter how bad JJ throws the damn ball, he is a threat with his feet..he has 4.6 speed, who fricking cares...with lee in the game, and no footspeed more blitz packages are thrown in and thats when you go over the top...which is EXACTLY what we did the last drive against Tennessee. Both bring their own skill sets but the running game will always be better with JJ in i dont give a frick what yall say ive played QB since i was 5 and thats just how it is. Lee is the pass threat, JJ is the Run threat. Who cares who starts, Lee will see the majority of the snaps so everyone can stop frickin PMSing and booing when JJ gets in because its for a reason, 50% of his struggles are because of you motherfrickers on here that dog one of our own. why the frick would anyone wanna play qb for some of you stupid fricks.."frick yall ill play for myself"...and thats EXACTLY the mindframe he is in right now. Congrats. Ive seen people dog him at school, if i was him if hit yall in the fricking mouth. Same thing with Lee a few years ago...no player deserves that unless hes a professional, no one wants to represent you when you dont represent him.
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:30 pm
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

WWL


unreliable, vanilla, bland, scared of offending anything or anyone.


I didn't hear the report because I haven't listened to that drivel in 3 years.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

it doesnt matter how bad JJ throws the damn ball, he is a threat with his feet..he has 4.6 speed, who fricking cares.


I know someone faster.....

And they play QB too.....

Can you guess who it is?

Bench JJ.
Posted by JW1LL
Beaumont, TX
Member since Sep 2010
317 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:31 pm to
Theres obviously is a reason he is not playing QB...and me or you will never know unless we are in the practices. Rumor has it Shep didnt even wanna play QB..hmmm ever think of that?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162237 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

The problem with the stats is JJ just happened to be on the field when Ridley broke his two big runs.

1 was the first play of a drive where Ridley made a great cut.

The second was on a 2nd and 2 in the 3rd where he made another great move.

It had nothing to do with JJ. Take those 2 runs out and the numbers are almost identical between when the two QBs are in.

With JJ:
9 for 34 yards

With Lee:
11 for 39 yards

That isn't that big of a deal. Given the fact Ridley lost a huge run on the first drive Lee was in because of Barksdale's hold, I'd say the numbers aren't that different.

In the end, Les will do what Les is going to do. We just have to accept that even if it means failure for this team.


Agree 100%

The idiots yesterday were trying to attribute Ridley's success to JJ in that stat thread. I've never seen such an obtuse and willfully stupid analysis of data in my life.
Posted by lsutigerfan1976
Slidell, LA
Member since Nov 2009
2358 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:32 pm to
Everyone keeps saying that Lee will get more snaps. As far as i know he will alternate with JJ. So the breakdown of how many times you see one or the other qb really depends on two things, one who starts the ball game. And two how many possesions total we have on offense. You also have to take into account the amount of time of possesion for both teams. If its in favor of Fla, than i dont know how many series either qb would have. And lets say one qb from LSU drives the lengths of the field and we hold on to the ball for a very long time that posession. That would also eliminate the chances of the other qb seeing the field.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10234 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:33 pm to
JWILL while I don't disagree at all with the rant against the arse holes dogging him out, his play was shite before the dogging started. He just isn't that good man.
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:36 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162237 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

who cares. everyone is trying to mash numbers. its pretty simple. when you have a threat to run, alot of times you will "spy" that qb with a defensive player.

Dude really? You really think that people are spying JJ?

He's not Vick. The one long run he had was a fluke. He hasn't been that consistent of a runner.
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9458 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

coach miles radio show is in code and ya'll are too dense to understand that. it has been leaked, however, and the WWL staff was able to deciphor some of it. much of it is still being worked out by the on staff cryptologists that have been hired exclusivly for that purpose. expect more revelations later. hopefully, the coaching staff won't realize the code is being broken and we will get other prize pieces of info. in the coming weeks


There's an Enigma machine on display at the WWII Museum in N.O. Maybe WWL has access to it...
Posted by JW1LL
Beaumont, TX
Member since Sep 2010
317 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:37 pm to
im not saying hes good, at all. but if anyone knows football, you know that with a mobile QB, spreads the defense out. and our coach wants to utilize that. so be it.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10234 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:38 pm to
I guarantee UF isn't worried about JJ beating them with his legs.
Posted by WelcomeToDeathValley
1st & 1st
Member since Aug 2006
16947 posts
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

He's not Vick. The one long run he had was a fluke


All part of the master plan, hes just been disguising his elusiveness and speed since 2008.

You guys need to get your minds right.

That career 2.3 ypc is all just 1 big mind frick for the home stretch this year
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:40 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram