Started By
Message

re: Why don't you leave bunt on?

Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:50 pm to
Posted by couvy1
Gonzales, la
Member since Dec 2005
291 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:50 pm to
Agree 100% .Pitch mentality is different at that point. he bounced a few breaking balls. That pitch may not be thrown if a runner is on third. Whole different psyc with Kramer on Third. B Jordan is just trying to lift one to the outfield
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24606 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:51 pm to
No its called getting owned all day by the gators pitching staff and get the lead runner to third with no outscout at all costs.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24606 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:51 pm to
Duplicate
This post was edited on 5/28/16 at 7:51 pm
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40926 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:51 pm to
once Kramer got to second on the pass ball, Paul went from trying to tie it to trying to win it. He wanted Bryce to get a hit to get on base to get the 2-1 lead. i don't blame him, the team is running out of arms and the last thing it needs is extras
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:51 pm to
Paul fricked up so bad. That was just a clinic on bad game management. What a joke.
Posted by windmill
Prairieville, La
Member since Dec 2005
7014 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:51 pm to
You're a fool
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85031 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:52 pm to
We only used 3 pitchers. We weren't strapped and wouldn't be tomorrow.
Posted by SofaKingTrill
Member since Mar 2008
6830 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:52 pm to
quote:


Why would you take the bat out of your 4 hole hitter in an rib situation


Because he hasn't hit the ball all game. Moving the runner to third allows you to tie the game with a fly out. Instead your 4 hole hitter struck out and you got nothing out of it.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59072 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:53 pm to
You let your guy hit and try to hit it to the right side of the field. That way, he has a chance of getting a hit and not giving up an out. Only have 3 of them left, no reason to give one up for free if you have a guy up there you are confident can handle the bat.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22308 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:53 pm to
Mainieri deserves criticism here.

Bunting on 0-0 and 1-0, then decide to trust your hitter who has struck out his 2 previous ABs

And If you're wanting him to hit there b/c you lack trust in your on deck guy, you green light 3-0

But Jordan showed why the bunt was the correct choice on the 3-1 and 3-2 pitches.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24606 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:54 pm to
Agreed but we should be used to it by now
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85031 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:54 pm to
You hope you go 1-3 with the Jordans and a freshman between. Or you take an out. Hope Romero gets it to the OF or gets a hit, if not, the next guy gets a hit. I take my chances with Romero making contact over a freshman getting a hit.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24606 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:55 pm to
No u need a run at all costs at that point....3rd inning different story but we were in do or die situation. Very poor team management
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

once Kramer got to second on the pass ball, Paul went from trying to tie it to trying to win it.


Not really, he just looked at probability of getting a base hit to score the run on a 3-1 count in that situation vs. bunting over. It's a 50-50 gut call. I would have bunted on 3-1 but you can make a case for either call. Lack of a solid left handed pinch hitter is a concern though.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
40202 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:56 pm to
Jordan wouldn't have been up to hit a fly ball if he bunted. Infield would have been in for Wofford and Wofford would have been 2nd out. No difference. Problem was no Reid
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
40202 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:57 pm to
We wouldn't have scored either way
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22939 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:57 pm to
While I agree, I can see Paul's reasoning. If Bryce just makes contact, Krob moves up. Throwing sliders, you hit that shite oppo field.

That last swing by Bryce was pathetic.
Posted by TigersforEver
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2008
1930 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:58 pm to
I just don't get Wofford there... Send Romero up first.
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22939 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:59 pm to
Meh. If krob is at third with one out, wofford is swinging for a fly ball to the outfield.

Having a runner @ third should change a batters approach at the plate.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22308 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 8:01 pm to
That sounds good, except I saw his 2 previous ABs, and then he showed you the type of day he's having on 3-1 and 3-2.

And if you're going on his overall body of work and that you don't trust Wofford w 1 out and a man on third, don't square him twice.

Bunting w Robertson on first is slightly more questionable than advancing him to third, if you're questioning taking the bat out of his hands, IMO.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram