Started By
Message

re: Why Didn't One of Our OL Fake Hurt?

Posted on 11/22/09 at 3:39 pm to
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80252 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Why Didn't One of Our OL Fake Hurt?


quote:

TWO-MINUTE WARNING/10-SECOND RUNOFF: The requirement that the offense has to be behind in the score or the score has to be tied for a 10-second clock runoff to be exercised against the offense for an excess timeout with two minutes to go in the first half or in the game has been eliminated. Now a 10-second runoff will take place no matter what the game situation. Any possible advantage for the offense (e.g., the old rule would not require a 10-second runoff if it were ahead) has been eliminated. The defense has the option to decline a 10-second runoff
Posted by crispy1
Bossier City
Member since Oct 2008
21 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 3:42 pm to
EXACTLY! Why didn't Les call the time out at 26 seconds? I guess if he does, they have time to prepare (the defense) for the long pass...The pass play on 1st and 10 1:04 left and 2 t.o....that was the idiot...who takes credit for that play?
Posted by crispy1
Bossier City
Member since Oct 2008
21 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 3:49 pm to
Going for the EZ is OK, unless you get sacked for a 9 yd loss! Has anyone show him (JJ) what the pocket is? Maybe another thing Gary C. overlooked!
Posted by RANDY44
Member since Aug 2005
9572 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Besides, with them blitzing the hell out of JJ, they should have called a screen anyway.

As they did two plays prior. Mind-boggling. And after two years in the program Jefferson still doesn't know how to check out of a play.
Posted by capnken
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2007
24 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Why Didn't One of Our OL Fake Hurt?


quote:
TWO-MINUTE WARNING/10-SECOND RUNOFF: The requirement that the offense has to be behind in the score or the score has to be tied for a 10-second clock runoff to be exercised against the offense for an excess timeout with two minutes to go in the first half or in the game has been eliminated. Now a 10-second runoff will take place no matter what the game situation. Any possible advantage for the offense (e.g., the old rule would not require a 10-second runoff if it were ahead) has been eliminated. The defense has the option to decline a 10-second runoff


Hmm, what might be the clue that this is an NFL rule, not a college football rule? Oh, right - that reference to the two minute warning.
Posted by JLSU20
Conroe Texas
Member since Jul 2004
2046 posts
Posted on 11/22/09 at 4:31 pm to
If we have to do that I rather lose
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram