Started By
Message
locked post

Who thinks the old tiger logo is better than the new tiger

Posted on 7/31/09 at 1:39 am
Posted by tigers9898
tha ridge
Member since Feb 2009
1127 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 1:39 am
I think the old tiger logo is awesome and I think its dumb we gave some corporate guy money to design the new tiger. It should have been done by an lsu student maybe its just me.
Posted by christiger3
Kenner
Member since Apr 2009
435 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 1:44 am to
I couldnt agree more
Posted by futuretiger6
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2007
2576 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 2:47 am to
naw toonces is the shite brah.
Posted by bayoubilly57
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
459 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 2:58 am to
HOW COULD THEY EVER GET RAID OF THE OLD TIGER
Posted by dangerousdon
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
593 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 6:37 am to
Old logo is definitely the better one.
Posted by GastonOverstreet
Westbanker
Member since Mar 2006
519 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 6:50 am to
We are WAY ahead of you.

LINK

Please sign and pass it on.


DOWN WITH TOONCES!!!!!!

LINK
Posted by BT
North La
Member since Aug 2008
9766 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 7:27 am to
makes you wonder sometimes..... fact is somebody said yeah that thing is our new tiger, I approve it.. go ahead and send the check.

That person needs to be fuking fired.
Posted by CaseyMc2
Louisiana Native
Member since Feb 2009
4092 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 7:34 am to
I think this move to use comic artwork or toomces instead of real looking tigers should have never taken place. We better Artist than that were actual LSU Football players and one of them is contemplating leaving Louisiana because his work is not welcomed here any longer. He painted the original Tiger bursting out of Tiger Stadium back in 1982 after LSU beat Alabama and the Bear 20-10.

His Name Don McCorkle. He has since updated that picture in last couple of months and the owner of Raising Caines Fried Chicken has purchased his latest work.

Instead using our own LSU football players LSU had rather use comic strip artist insted of good real artwork with real looking tigers.

I talked with him the other day and he is tired of trying get his work excepted by LSU and moving to Tenn. I asked him if he would change his mind and he said no.

This is one time I was and am aginst Bertman. He was the one that started it and he is the one that convinced TAF on this crap.
Posted by LSUcjb318
Member since Jul 2008
2364 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 7:38 am to
OLD

+1000000000000000000000
Posted by TigerWoody
btwn where I was & where I will be
Member since Dec 2007
11387 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 7:43 am to
I prefer ANY of the old school Tigers: the helmet logo, the '30s style pouncing tiger and the tiger with the hat. Toonces sucks!
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60612 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 7:46 am to
LSU didnt get the new logo thinking it would look better, they got the new logo for mass marketing purposes...the logo is less intricate and much easier to mass produce on flags and banners, etc


surely you must know by now its all about $$$
Posted by LSULANE
Earth
Member since May 2007
4170 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 7:52 am to
I don't buy toonces gear=bad cartoon.
Posted by BT
North La
Member since Aug 2008
9766 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 7:54 am to
quote:

LSU didnt get the new logo thinking it would look better, they got the new logo for mass marketing purposes...the logo is less intricate and much easier to mass produce on flags and banners, etc


surely you must know by now its all about $$$


Im going to translate.
LSU went cheap to save a few bucks.
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9269 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 8:06 am to
A few thoughts:

1. It would have been nice for LSU to use a graphics artist or a graphics company with an LSU connection. Or, at least a Louisiana connection.

2. An earlier poster suggested we should use an LSU student to do it. While there are many talented LSU art and graphic design students, this is entirely inappropriate for a professional logo design. BAD IDEA.

3. The poster before me has it right. This is about mass marketing and use of the logo on a WIDE variety of products. You see, you can't use just "one" logo. You need a whole suite of logos that are similar. In LSU's case, there's a Toonces logo, a floating head logo, a jumping Tiger logo, specific fonts, etc. It's versatile for layout. That's its strength. Old logo? It's just a Tiger head. That's all we got.

4. The only university I can think of off-hand that uses only one logo successfully for pretty much everything is Texas, and no matter how you slice it, it's a one-color logo. Easy to use, easy to reproduce. Old LSU logo? It's very intricate. It needs to be simpler.

5. The thing that irritates me most of all about the "new" logo is that the company we used has created almost identical logos for about a dozen other universities. I don't like that we got the plug-into-package treatment.

6. Don't get me wrong. I like the old logo just fine. But I don't really understand the sentimentality toward it. All we ever did with that logo is lose. Year after year. At least we win with Toonces on our side.

7. No, I don't hate Toonces. I think we could have done better, but I don't hate it.

8. I suspect less people are up in arms about Toonces than the representation on this board indicates.

Posted by DanglingFury
Living the dream
Member since Dec 2007
20449 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 8:28 am to
quote:

No, I don't hate Toonces. I think we could have done better, but I don't hate it.


I honestly think Toonces is one of the worst college logos going right now.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
72977 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 8:33 am to
Gotta keep with the times. New logo needs to go on the helmet and replace old Mike. I would also put new logo at midfield in place of Tiger Eye to standardize our brand.
Posted by BT
North La
Member since Aug 2008
9766 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 9:05 am to
quote:

8. I suspect less people are up in arms about Toonces than the representation on this board indicates.


I suspect your suspecion is wrong.
Outside of childern, girls and people who buy their LSU gear at walmart.
This post was edited on 7/31/09 at 9:06 am
Posted by TexasTigah
Houston, TX
Member since Mar 2006
12183 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Who thinks the old tiger logo is better than the new tiger
everyone with eyes
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24333 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 9:21 am to
quote:

would also put new logo at midfield in place of Tiger Eye


No way.
Posted by TommyD
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
69 posts
Posted on 7/31/09 at 9:24 am to
Amen. The new one looks like such a cute little kitten, not a fierce Bengal Tiger
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram