- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Was the roughing the passer call against LSU legitimate?
Posted on 10/16/17 at 11:57 am
Posted on 10/16/17 at 11:57 am
I believe in the third quarter Stidham threw incomplete on third down from inside the Auburn 10. However, LSU was penalized for roughing the passer. On the stadium replay it was not clear. There was a pass rusher who was being blocked and possibly was pushed into Stidham, but the replay stopped so it was not clear why the call was made. Was the call legitimate or was it the impetus from the block which caused the pass rusher to contact he quarterback?
13
Posted on 10/16/17 at 11:57 am to tigersbb
They didn’t give a good replay at the game. I was wondering this as well.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 11:58 am to tigersbb
If you are referring to the one on Key, it was clearly roughing the passer. He had thrown the ball 2 seconds prior and Key didn't see him throw it, and assumed he still had it.
Was the right call.
Was the right call.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 11:58 am to tigersbb
quote:
There was a pass rusher who was being blocked and possibly was pushed into Stidham,
That was our perception from 414. Looked engaged with the blocker. Should not have been called.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 11:58 am to tigersbb
Close, but legit call
Posted on 10/16/17 at 11:59 am to tigersbb
Watching on tv I thought he was blocked into him.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:00 pm to tigersbb
It was Roughing the Passer, if you mean the penalty on KEY, definitely 
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:00 pm to tigerfan182
It was the right call...he took two steps after the ball was thrown
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:01 pm to tigersbb
tackler was late
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:05 pm to mikelbr
"hat was our perception from 414. Looked engaged with the blocker. Should not have been called."
that's what I thought, too, but I did not have a good view.
that's what I thought, too, but I did not have a good view.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:11 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
If you are referring to the one on Key, it was clearly roughing the passer. He had thrown the ball 2 seconds prior and Key didn't see him throw it, and assumed he still had it.
Was the right call.
Orgeron laid into Key on the sidelines. So, I assumed it was a good call.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:14 pm to tigersbb
100% the right call. No question about it.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:16 pm to tigersbb
Key didn't see him get rid of the ball, it was a pretty late hit.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:19 pm to tigersbb
yes, but the intentional grounding on us was not
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:24 pm to bee Rye
and key was being held with an arm bar on the play.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:42 pm to higgins
to me, valid call for roughing the passer. he took two full steps and hit him with helmet also.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:48 pm to larry289
quote:
Close, but legit call
It wasn't close at all. Stidham had gotten rid of the ball like 3 seconds before Key hit him.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:51 pm to tigersbb
Against Key? Yes absolutely yes.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:52 pm to tigerfan182
quote:
Watching on tv I thought he was blocked into him.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:56 pm to tigersbb
Yes it was a legit call
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News