- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Steele vs. Chavis Statistics
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:23 pm
These are an average of Steele's career at Clemson, and Chavis at LSU (The talent is based from 247 and only defensive players.)
Average Talent Steele .8714 Chavis .9329
I think its crazy that won 3/5 categories since Steele had significantly less talent and also played with an uptempo offense while Chavis had an offense that controlled the clock.
3rd Down %: Steele 39.487 Chavis 35.27
Sacks Steele 33.33 Chavis 28.3
Int Steele 16.7 Chavis 14.83
TFL Steele 94.4 Chavis 85
YPP Steele 4.98 Chavis 4.67
Average Talent Steele .8714 Chavis .9329
I think its crazy that won 3/5 categories since Steele had significantly less talent and also played with an uptempo offense while Chavis had an offense that controlled the clock.
3rd Down %: Steele 39.487 Chavis 35.27
Sacks Steele 33.33 Chavis 28.3
Int Steele 16.7 Chavis 14.83
TFL Steele 94.4 Chavis 85
YPP Steele 4.98 Chavis 4.67
19
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:26 pm to floridatiger420
Steele Curtain
Brotherhood of Steele
Steele Bandits
Steele Tigers
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:36 pm to rmnldr
as long as it isn't Steele On The Field
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:38 pm to floridatiger420
Statistics are for Chavis. I would rather win every game but come out last statistically.
This post was edited on 6/24/15 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:40 pm to floridatiger420
By the end of the year, we will be looking back and saying "remember when our defense used to keep us in games." Steele is no Chavis, if you want to act like a child and pretend that he is because Chavis left, then knock yourself out.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:46 pm to floridatiger420
Stats vs WVU?
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:48 pm to floridatiger420
Chavis can thank Tiger Stadium for that 3rd down percentage
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:52 pm to ellessuuuu
Ehh, minus 1 year with "No DC". LSU has been just fine. Pelini, Champ, Chavis all had good showings at LSU. I'm not concerned about our D at all, Corey Raymond could run this D himself, he's still on staff last time I checked 
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:57 pm to bulldogger
quote:
Stats vs WVU?
Ouch. You are right. Here they are...
28 first downs.
533 total yards.
463 passing yards.
87 plays ran.
Almost 60% completion rate.
Damn. And to think that was with tGOAT defense at LSU that Chavis had.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:59 pm to bulldogger
Vs. LSU
1st Downs 28
Total Yards 533
Yards Per Pass 7.1
Offensive Scoring: 21
Vs. Clemson
1st Downs 31
Total Yards 595
Yards Per Pass 8.8
Points Off Turnovers: 28
Offensive Scoring: 42
Noted: Clemson had a very young defense in 2011 and that was the most talented defense to ever play college football.
1st Downs 28
Total Yards 533
Yards Per Pass 7.1
Offensive Scoring: 21
Vs. Clemson
1st Downs 31
Total Yards 595
Yards Per Pass 8.8
Points Off Turnovers: 28
Offensive Scoring: 42
Noted: Clemson had a very young defense in 2011 and that was the most talented defense to ever play college football.
This post was edited on 6/24/15 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:19 pm to Fratigerguy
quote:
quote: Stats vs WVU? Ouch. You are right. Here they are... 28 first downs. 533 total yards. 463 passing yards. 87 plays ran. Almost 60% completion rate. Damn. And to think that was with tGOAT defense at LSU that Chavis had.
Just goes to show you can't judge a coach by 1 game. Clemson turned the ball over 4 times in their game
LSU got 4 Turnovers. That's the difference really
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:31 pm to Dlab2013
Here, here!
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:33 pm to floridatiger420
Well, to be fair if all other things are equal, you would expect a defense that is on the field more often (the defense of the team that runs the up tempo offense) to have more sacks, interceptions, and tackles for loss.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:40 pm to bulldogger
What about the Chavis stats for loses in the final two minutes?
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:50 pm to ellessuuuu
quote:
By the end of the year, we will be looking back and saying "remember when our defense used to keep us in games." Steele is no Chavis, if you want to act like a child and pretend that he is because Chavis left, then knock yourself out.
Bet.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:55 pm to MoneyShot
These stats for Steele at Clemson are not as bad as I expected. Some are so negative they assume failure. LSUs offense will always help the defense with ground and pound. Clemson and TAM...not so much.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 12:14 am to floridatiger420
Just curious but wouldn't we expect Steele at Clemson to lead in these categories given, as you pointed out, that their offense is up tempo vs our control tempo offense. Clemson would have to defend a lot more plays so if expect them to lead in categories with cumulative totals, such as total sacks.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 12:45 am to floridatiger420
Another huge difference is the assistants that Steel is working with. One of the best DL coaches, same for secondary, and he's a linebackers coach. I just find it extremely funny that people think that LSUs D will somehow fall off after it's been tops for forever. If we were young I could see us maybe falling off a little but we aren't and by the time our team is somewhat young his D will be established here. I just want to see more awareness and disguising from our D and I believe that is exactly what he will bring to our team. They will attack teams at their weakness and not play one style of defense that we have always seen from Chavis. It really was time for him to go. He was lazy and his defenses just weren't that exciting to watch if you ask me. I won't it see movement and aggressiveness our line should never stop trying to get into the back field and should always create confusion with an offensive line. I mean we wouldn't even sack the terrible teams we played?? We should have 3 to 5 sacks a game when we outmatch the opponent. We have been dropping lots of ints also and aren't usually in the right places when there is a fumble. When that happens over and over something is wrong. I believe our sack total will go way up and so will the TOs. I guess we'll see
This post was edited on 6/25/15 at 12:47 am
Posted on 6/25/15 at 4:55 am to floridatiger420
quote:
Steele had significantly less talent and also played with an uptempo offense while Chavis had an offense that kept the defense on the field.
FIFY
Our recent defense kept us in games even with an inept offense. Yea, there was some games where we couldn't stop people late but without that defense we wouldn't have even been in the game in the late quarters. To believe we didn't take a step back in DC is foolish.... Until proven wrong.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 6:08 am to UpToPar
quote:
Well, to be fair if all other things are equal, you would expect a defense that is on the field more often (the defense of the team that runs the up tempo offense) to have more sacks, interceptions, and tackles for loss.
Not necessarily. You would expect a defense that is on the field more often to wear down, fail to get sacks, and begin to miss more tackles at or behind the line. Yes, they have more opportunities, but also tend to make more mistakes.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News