Started By
Message
locked post

ridley's performance against la tech?

Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:40 am
Posted by pensatom
pensacola, florida
Member since Jan 2009
194 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:40 am
i was disappointed. he ran hard , but i didn't see the elusiveness
he displayed in other games. i didn't see the crisp cuts.
williams looked much better.
Posted by DByrd2
Fredericksburg, VA
Member since Jun 2008
8962 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:41 am to
He didn't really have that many carries did he?
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81625 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:42 am to
People were trying to tackle him and stuff.
Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:47 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/18/09 at 9:18 am
Posted by bulmoss
Member since Oct 2006
300 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:51 am to
Keiland got the holes that Ridley had against Tulane. He did make some yards on his own however.

I want Ridley to convert some of those third-and-shorts. He's going to be relied on to do that more and more in the future, and I think he's capable, so I want him to get a taste of success in that situation soon.
Posted by Teacher
Member since Sep 2006
3060 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:52 am to
Miles is a stuborn coach. He started with Ridley a few times then went KW and stayed with KW the whole game. Good coaches switch RBs to keep them fresh and involved in the game. Miles picks one running back for the whole game unless he gets hurt which they usually do.
Posted by Me4Heisman
Landmass
Member since Aug 2004
5509 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:52 am to
You have to at least give a running back a chance to get in a rhythm before judging his performance. Miles has never allowed this.
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:58 am to
quote:

You have to at least give a running back a chance to get in a rhythm before judging his performance. Miles has never allowed this.


Miles will never be "right" in this situation. Either he isn't getting the ball to the guys that need it enough, or he is ignoring the stars.

We actually have so many studs on the team that nothing will be pleasing to the fans. People bitch if Scott is the feature back and gets 18 carries; then they bitch when Keiland only gets 2 carries; then if Keiland gets 9 carries for 22 yards, they bitch because they gave too many carries to Keiland; then they bitch when Shepard gets 3 carries, but they don't suggest who shouldn't get carries.

The only common denominator is that people like to bitch.
Posted by Me4Heisman
Landmass
Member since Aug 2004
5509 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:00 am to
No, actually its like when Scott ripped up UK's defense in the first half in 2007, then he sits the entire rest of the game to come in on the 4th and 1 in 3OT. Things like that which are obvious to anyone with half a brain.
Posted by Teacher
Member since Sep 2006
3060 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:03 am to
Well I still don't know why Miles has Reggie Bush (SHEP) sitting on the bench. Maybe he should call Pete at USC.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59072 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Well I still don't know why Miles has Reggie Bush (SHEP) sitting on the bench.



Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32453 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Miles will never be "right" in this situation. Either he isn't getting the ball to the guys that need it enough, or he is ignoring the stars.
Just play the hot hand and we win. It's really an easy decision, Miles and Co. are overthinking this stuff way too much. There won't be much criticism if we win. I think this is more the fault of Larry Porter than it is Miles.
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:12 am to
quote:

No, actually its like when Scott ripped up UK's defense in the first half in 2007, then he sits the entire rest of the game to come in on the 4th and 1 in 3OT. Things like that which are obvious to anyone with half a brain.


Good thing you just demonstrated you have no knowledge of football.

Listen to the coaches. They tell you why shite like this happens. Scott had one carry for 55 yds, one for 13 and then 5 more for 26 yds. Kentucky made some defensive adjustments (I believe they cheated a safety up to plug the gap that Scott was busting) and made that play no longer a good idea. It's really not a difficult concept. Defenses make adjustments just like offenses.

It was part of the reason we threw the ball 6 times in a row against Tech when the run was unstoppable -- they made some adjustments that made the pass more attractive (too bad Lee can't pass accurately) than the run.

Ever think that the guys making the cash actually know what to look for?

"Going with the hot hand" makes no sense if the play the "hot hand" is running is plugged up by a defensive adjustment.
Posted by Me4Heisman
Landmass
Member since Aug 2004
5509 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:17 am to
quote:

They tell you why shite like this happens. Scott had one carry for 55 yds, one for 13 and then 5 more for 26 yds. Kentucky made some defensive adjustments (I believe they cheated a safety up to plug the gap that Scott was busting) and made that play no longer a good idea. It's really not a difficult concept. Defenses make adjustments just like offenses.


Wow. So you bench a guy b/c he only got 5 yards per carry the last time around. Instead you start passing when not necessary which leads to multiple 3 and outs as well as a crucial interception. And you are going to question someone else's football knowledge.....
This post was edited on 11/18/09 at 9:20 am
Posted by aglandry
lafayette
Member since Oct 2008
2574 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:19 am to
Did you notice that the holes that were opened in the TULANE & LA TECH games were made when certain players who usually start weren't playing. Sorta gives you a clue who should be replaced on the O-Line and maybe we can improve the running game. Then perhaps we wouldn't have so many 3 & out series. You would think it would dawn on someone that changes up front might improve this team. When Scott, Keiland & Ridley had their best rushing totals certain players weren't in the game as O-Linemen & others were.Seems they(coaches) are either blind or clueless.
This post was edited on 11/18/09 at 9:22 am
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:22 am to
quote:

So you bench a guy b/c he only got 5 yards per carry the last time around. Instead you start passing when not necessary which leads to multiple 3 and outs as well as a crucial interception. And you are going to question someone else's football knowledge.....


Can you even read?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Good thing you just demonstrated you have no knowledge of football.

Listen to the coaches. They tell you why shite like this happens. Scott had one carry for 55 yds, one for 13 and then 5 more for 26 yds. Kentucky made some defensive adjustments (I believe they cheated a safety up to plug the gap that Scott was busting) and made that play no longer a good idea. It's really not a difficult concept. Defenses make adjustments just like offenses.


so you bench the running back who is running the best and replace him for an injured running back? It was probably Miles' worst decision while coaching at LSU.

quote:

It was part of the reason we threw the ball 6 times in a row against Tech when the run was unstoppable -- they made some adjustments that made the pass more attractive (too bad Lee can't pass accurately) than the run.


and we should have ran the ball. Receivers were open all game, but it was NOT WORKING.

quote:

Ever think that the guys making the cash actually know what to look for?


i can't believe anybody thinks that playing a hurt Hester over a healthy Scott who was tearing up Kentucky's defense was the right move. It was stupid. What could Hester have done, especially when hurt, that Scott could not?
Posted by Me4Heisman
Landmass
Member since Aug 2004
5509 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Can you even read?


Yes, even though you just made me want to forget how.
Posted by Me4Heisman
Landmass
Member since Aug 2004
5509 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:35 am to
quote:

It was part of the reason we threw the ball 6 times in a row against Tech when the run was unstoppable -- they made some adjustments that made the pass more attractive (too bad Lee can't pass accurately) than the run.


Glad someone else caught this gem. Unreal.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81262 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Listen to the coaches. They tell you why shite like this happens. Scott had one carry for 55 yds, one for 13 and then 5 more for 26 yds. Kentucky made some defensive adjustments (I believe they cheated a safety up to plug the gap that Scott was busting) and made that play no longer a good idea. It's really not a difficult concept. Defenses make adjustments just like offenses.


holy shite. so, Jacob Hester limping to 3.5 yards a carry was better because a safety cheated up and the "one play" that Scott could run was taken away? Also, is 5 for 26 better than Hester was getting that game?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram