- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Regarding the Chavis contract...
Posted on 12/17/15 at 7:36 pm to GRTiger
Posted on 12/17/15 at 7:36 pm to GRTiger
quote:
No, it's clarification.
Yes, it's a clarification, but doing so acknowledges and validates an alternative interpretation. This thing is going to come down to whether or not Chavis did something prior to Jan 1 to make him liable. LSU knows this and that's why they want his phone records. Otherwise the shite he did in Jan would have made this a slam dunk.
1
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:32 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
This thing is going to come down to whether or not Chavis did something prior to Jan 1 to make him liable
quote:
Through a public records request, LSU obtained a letter of agreement for Chavis to become the new defensive coordinator at Texas A&M. The letter was sent to Chavis on Dec. 27 and was signed in December, though the exact day was redacted. LSU lost 31-28 to Notre Dame in the Music City Bowl, which took place on Dec. 30.
Which is why I stated earlier that the dates being defined more clearly to the obvious (I again hold the opinion that it didn't change anything by spelling it out) don't affect anything. The agreement had been put in place prior to the deadline.....no matter which way you interpret it.
Eta and why the frick did this get an anchor?
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 8:34 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News