- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: offsides
Posted on 11/28/14 at 7:29 am to udtiger
Posted on 11/28/14 at 7:29 am to udtiger
quote:
Terrible non-call. Had it been called,still does not mean A&M wins (but they likely would have).
How do you know this? It would have been a 5 yard penalty. What makes you think they drive it in for a TD with no timeouts?
1
Posted on 11/28/14 at 7:30 am to dukke v
quote:
dukke v
somebody MAD....LOL....his prediction was way off, AGAIN....LMAO......I still think you are a piece of shite for picking bama.....did you get any right out of the last several?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 7:38 am to Tigerinthehollow
Tough no call. I feel for AM QB especially. But
Our TE was held early in the game. And PI was a bad call.
the PF called in BAMA game was unforgivable.
Our TE was held early in the game. And PI was a bad call.
the PF called in BAMA game was unforgivable.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 7:53 am to Gulf Coast Tiger
This is all BS. The only possible infraction was that his helmet MAY have been across the line. They NEVER showed a shot that demonstrated that. The images shown were all at an angle that didn't prove squat.
Now - assume his helmet WAS an inch into the neutral zone. That would be a TECHNICAL violation - one that gave him NO ad a gave on the play. In fact he wAs at a DISADVANTAVE. He was retreating when the ball was snapped instead of charging.
This in no way effected AtM negatively. In fact it was beneficial because it delayed the pass rush by a little.
NOT offside.
IF offside - technical only no advantage.
IF an advantage existed it was for the Aggies.
NO advantage to LSU on the play.
Now - assume his helmet WAS an inch into the neutral zone. That would be a TECHNICAL violation - one that gave him NO ad a gave on the play. In fact he wAs at a DISADVANTAVE. He was retreating when the ball was snapped instead of charging.
This in no way effected AtM negatively. In fact it was beneficial because it delayed the pass rush by a little.
NOT offside.
IF offside - technical only no advantage.
IF an advantage existed it was for the Aggies.
NO advantage to LSU on the play.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 8:54 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
This is all BS. The only possible infraction was that his helmet MAY have been across the line.
His helmet was in the neutral zone. It was a free play and that is why the QB threw it long. We got a gift, just accept it.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 9:36 am to teeMike
Because they had been moving the ball effectively against us in the second half, and up until that INT.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 10:39 am to Gulf Coast Tiger
How do you know his helmet was in the neutral zone??
The only view shown was at an angle of over 20 deg from the LOS. That prone film onto the. Lack line means nothing the headinesman has the only view that counts.
But eve IF he were in the. Eutr zone there was ZERO effect on the play. He's was back on his heels retreating from the LOS. All advantage to the Aggies on the way it developed.
Now if you argue thT it was good luck that the qB made a mistAke because of it that is a different argument. It it was not an officials gift.
The only view shown was at an angle of over 20 deg from the LOS. That prone film onto the. Lack line means nothing the headinesman has the only view that counts.
But eve IF he were in the. Eutr zone there was ZERO effect on the play. He's was back on his heels retreating from the LOS. All advantage to the Aggies on the way it developed.
Now if you argue thT it was good luck that the qB made a mistAke because of it that is a different argument. It it was not an officials gift.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 10:44 am to udtiger
"Moving the ball effectively against us in the second half"? Check the stats, subtract the 41 yard TD run in the first quarter, subtract that yardage from their total and that tells you exactly how effective our defense was. 4 straight 3 and outs as I recall, midway thru the 3rd. One chicken shite PI call on 3rd and 23 or they don't score then.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 10:49 am to TBoy
quote:evidently that ref is fallible.
You know there is a ref that looks right down the line every play. He would have had a better angle and view to make that call.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 11:11 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
ChineseBandit58
If you understood football you would know why the QB threw the ball like he did. Of course it was to the Aggies advantage, we were off side and they had a free play
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:12 pm to Gulf Coast Tiger
I understand football perfectly - in this instance. It was good luck for us that the ag qb made a big mistake. It was NOT a refs mistake that GAVE them something.
The play started with an advantage to the Aggies because on of our defensive linemen was on his heels when the ball was snPped instead of being in full rushing stance.
The qB then made a mistake.
shite happens. Good for us this time.
I'm just sayin all this crap about a blown Call is utter bullshite.
The play started with an advantage to the Aggies because on of our defensive linemen was on his heels when the ball was snPped instead of being in full rushing stance.
The qB then made a mistake.
shite happens. Good for us this time.
I'm just sayin all this crap about a blown Call is utter bullshite.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News