- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No way you can call it play off with only 4 teams
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:46 pm
How quickly the season ends for teams like LSU and Wisconsin and the rest of regular season becomes meaningless (I know three is miracle possibilities). We need at least 8 teams with 6 getting byes and 4 playing for the final 2 spots. Just saying to get you mind off Miles offense.
9
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:51 pm to CalTiger53
4 is more than the previous 2
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:54 pm to CalTiger53
4-team "playoff" is the way to go, but going to a selection committee was just retarded. Should've just kept the BCS formula.
And our playoff chances aren't over by a long shot if we somehow learn how to football..
And our playoff chances aren't over by a long shot if we somehow learn how to football..
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:55 pm to 904
You don't like condoleeza rice picking teams?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:56 pm to CalTiger53
I'd be in favor of 6 teams. Every power conference would have a chance to participate (but a particularly weak champion could still be left out). There would also be an incentive to play for the top 2 spots, with byes in play.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:57 pm to CalTiger53
Everybody gets a trophy. Kind of like pee wee football.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:59 pm to The Mick
quote:
4 is more than the previous 2
Baby steps, y'all.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:02 pm to The Mick
Keep the BCS formula and just have Condoleeza replace both the AP and Coaches' polls imo. problem solved.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:03 pm to 904
Rice, sharpton and a couple folks from ferguson
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:03 pm to CalTiger53
frick that noise. 4 is fine.
Where is it going to end ? A 64 team playoff with a play in game ?
This ain't fricking little league. Not everyone needs a trophy.
Where is it going to end ? A 64 team playoff with a play in game ?
This ain't fricking little league. Not everyone needs a trophy.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:07 pm to 904
quote:
4-team "playoff" is the way to go
You could have 3 best teams in the same conference and you will not have them in the play off with 4 teams. Also, nobody can tell which top 10 team is the best at the end of season unless they play it off. Currently, preseason rankings and schedule are big factors in selecting final 4.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:43 pm to 904
quote:
going to a selection committee was just retarded. Should've just kept the BCS formula.
I agree completely...a top secret selection comittee using top secret criteria to designate the teams that have a chance to progress is just too damn much for me to trust...
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:46 pm to Spankum
I can't think of a time when the best team wasn't in the top 4 of the BCS. I would've preferred BCS with 4 teams to select the playoff teams and semifinal matchups. The only part that you have to leave up to a committee is which semifinal is played where.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:51 pm to 904
Lol @ "learn how to football"
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:54 pm to CheerWhine
quote:
I can't think of a time when the best team wasn't in the top 4 of the BCS. I would've preferred BCS with 4 teams to select the playoff teams and semifinal matchups. The only part that you have to leave up to a committee is which semifinal is played where.
agree with this completely...
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:00 pm to CalTiger53
Right. Lets expand to 64 so we get in...
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:43 pm to Spankum
quote:
I can't think of a time when the best team wasn't in the top 4 of the BCS
How do you know who is best if they don't play each other at the end of season. I am sure you thought Alabama was better than Utah and Oklahoma before they played in the Sugar Bowl.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:45 pm to CalTiger53
quote:
How do you who is best if they have not played each other at the end of season. I am sure you thought Alabama was better than Utah and Oklahoma before they played in the Sugar Bowl.
What are we supposed to do ? Have a giant round robin where everyone plays everyone ?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:47 pm to The Mick
quote:
You don't like condoleeza rice picking teams?
I prefer Rupaul
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:48 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
4-team "playoff" is the way to go, but going to a selection committee was just retarded. Should've just kept the BCS formula.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News