- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In 2008, which game made you lose it with Lee?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:09 pm to AndyJ
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:09 pm to AndyJ
I remember getting to Tiger Stadium right before kickoff for the UGA game. As I was buying my coke outside my section I heard the pre game horns and cheers. I was pouring out 3/4 of my coke into a trash can to add my burbon and heard the unmistakable accellerating roar of the crowd that stops the instant the kickers foot hits the ball on a kickoff. I make my way to my seat and glance out to the field and see the tigers lining up for the first play of the drive. I turn my back to the field to put down my gasoline colored beverage and hear the aganoizing howl from the crowd telling me Lee threw his latest pick 6. I couldn't turn around fast enough to see it but I knew what had happened. Thats when he lost me...But a bad as his ints were in 2008, nothing was as miserable as watching the LSU db's taunt each other and laugh when we were getting our arse handed to us by Ole Miss in TS later that season
0
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:14 pm to AndyJ
I never really lost it for JL. Crowtons play calling was horrid for an inexperienced freshman QB. On a side note Maryland has as many ints as they do passing TDs. No QB coach, poor tackling with offense after interceptions, poor defense. Seeing JL sitting alone on the sidelines in some of those games infuriated me. The kid needed support from coaches that he never got. I still cant believe the kid stuck with LSU. I still think we should have stuck with him in 09 and 10. Just imagine the QB we would have now! Stafford at UGA had a rough start and look how well he did.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:31 pm to AndyJ
quote:
AndyJ
Get the frick out of here with this garbage.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:29 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
Now compare that to Lee, and it's easy to see why everyone said he was the best freshman since Hodson. In 11 games
Umm, you kind of left off an important stat.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:33 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
That's why you're the king of cherry picked stats.
What a joke.
There is not a single reasonable person on the planet that follows college football that would argue that Lee had a better freshman year than Russell.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:34 pm to Antonio Moss
What a dumb irrelevant thread.
And apparently its been up most of the day.
And apparently its been up most of the day.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:35 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
Remind me who Saban had as starting QB for the bowl game of JRs freshman year?
quote:
Because it wasn't JR
Yeah, he only lead us back in the game and gave a chance to win it.
Seriously, as a freshman, Russell started games over a 5th year senior QB.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:37 pm to Bojangles
quote:
What a dumb irrelevant thread.
Lot of Lee haters on the board.....a whole lot of them.
Best part is that Crowten being gone is the reason credited by most of them for the change in offensive output.
Yet it was Lee that made them "lose it".
fricking pathetic.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:50 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Best part is that Crowten being gone is the reason credited by most of them for the change in offensive output.
Yet it was Lee that made them "lose it".
You don't read well.
I never got upset with Lee in 2008.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:56 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
You don't read well.
Yes I do. Was I responding to you?
No. Oh and there are many others in this thread that have made such comments.
If the comment doesn't describe you (or even reference you), why take such umbrage with it? Guilty conscience maybe?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:00 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Was I responding to you?
I was the original poster to bring up the Stormin/ Mormon and only one a few to do so. Plus, you clearly said "most" were hating on Lee.
But please be specific. Which posters are you referencing?
quote:
No. Oh and there are many others in this thread that have made such comments.
Name them.
quote:
If the comment doesn't describe you (or even reference you), why take such umbrage with it? Guilty conscience maybe?
Guilt has little to do with anything. I just really like shooting down you're constant unfounded claims. It's become like a sport to me.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:05 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
I was the original poster to bring up the Stormin/ Mormon
Who fricking cares....this is what I responded to:
quote:
What a dumb irrelevant thread.
Are you the OP?
quote:
Which posters are you referencing?
Posters in this thread who have described when the "had it with Lee" that have also suggested that Crowten was the reason for our change in offense this year. I find the position hypocritical.
quote:
Name them.
You are perfectly capable of reading through this thread yourself.
quote:
Guilt has little to do with anything. I just really like shooting down you're constant unfounded claims.
Unfounded what you blithering tart....I didn't respond to you, reference you or comment about you.
Yet you felt you were under attack by my post. That is either guilty conscience or paranoid delusions.
Take your pick.
ETA: almost missed this gem:
quote:
like shooting down you're constant unfounded claims.
I see people make the mistake of not using the apostrophe...but adding it in for no reason, from a lawyer? lulz
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:13 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
We had no defense at all
We were truly put behind the eight ball that year. But I have to say, it almost certainly would have been a better season with Ryan Perrilloux as the QB.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:17 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Best part is that Crowten being gone is the reason credited by most of them for the change in offensive output.
Only three people in this thread mention Crowton:
MandevilleLSUTiger (page 1)
Antonio Moss (page 2)
ottothewise (page 4)
Of these three, only ottothewise stated that he ever "lost it with Lee."
quote:
Unfounded what
So you claim that most are crediting the offensive improvement with the removal of Crowton, while also stating that they lost it with Lee is . . . . . .you guessed it . . . .unfounded.
It was only one person - ottothewise. And that's really not fair because he has legitimate mental health issues.
quote:
That is either guilty conscience or paranoid delusions.
It's actually option "c" - having to constantly show you that you're wrong.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:26 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Only three people in this thread mention Crowton:
:sigh: I realize things over periods of time are difficult to remember. Try harder.
has this been the only thread where Crowton being gone has been proposed as the reason for the change in offensive production? Think real hard now.
quote:
.unfounded.
only if you ignore post history....why would you do that? Are you really to imply that of all the people who had "lost it with Lee" that none of them have EVER posited that the change in offensive production was due to Crowton?
really? There have been lots of threads on Crowton, and I know you don't take each thread as a stand alone thought process based on our previous conversations...so what gives?
quote:
It's actually option "c" - having to constantly show you that you're wrong.
Once again, guilty conscience or paranoid delusion?
I only had to go as far as the second response in the thread....
quote:
After the UGA game, I was convinced that we did not have a good QB.
-c on z
quote:LINK
If Crowton is still our OC/QB coach then hellz no.
-c on z
Oh and I'll bet I can find more.....so does that mean you're a paranoid delusional or just have a guilty conscience?
ETA: notice the proper use of the apostrophe in "you're" within that last comment.
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:26 pm to CptBengal
WHy is this thread not anchored or whacked?
If I would have started the same thread but changed JL to JJ and 2018 to 2010... these idiots would have lost their fukcing mind.
If I would have started the same thread but changed JL to JJ and 2018 to 2010... these idiots would have lost their fukcing mind.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:27 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:
If I would have started the same thread but changed JL to JJ and 2018 to 2010... these idiots would have lost their fukcing mind.
interesting experiment, lets see what happens.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:32 pm to CptBengal
do it..
not only that how much more relevant is 2010 to 2008?
not only that how much more relevant is 2010 to 2008?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:50 pm to CptBengal
quote:
like shooting down you're constant unfounded claims.
I see people make the mistake of not using the apostrophe
Yep, typing too fast. It happens.
quote:
...but adding it in for no reason, from a lawyer? lulz
And an English Minor to boot.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 5:54 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
ep, typing too fast. It happens.
care to answer whether you're a paranoid delusional or have a guilty conscience?
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News