- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hilarious Michael Cauble on College football live just said
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:35 pm
that the initial witness report was all the cops needed to charge both JJs with 2nd degree battery! Thats beyond retarded the victim and his a girl he was slamming were the only ones on that!
6
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:41 pm to LSUfan007700
You should leave this one alone...sports2 is one of our best sources on TD.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:47 pm to LSUfan007700
i read the report like most on here have. he is actually correct in that statement. seriously, arrest could have been made at that time.
whats retarded is you posting this
whats retarded is you posting this
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:49 pm to LSUfan007700
Yea, it was a pretty damning report
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:49 pm to MsandLa
quote:thats not what I meant, I mean that's retarded they both got charged on such flimsy evidence
read the report like most on here have. he is actually correct in that statement. seriously, arrest could have been made at that time. whats retarded is you posting this
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:51 pm to LSUfan007700
quote:
read the report like most on here have. he is actually correct in that statement. seriously, arrest could have been made at that time. whats retarded is you posting this
thats not what I meant, I mean that's retarded they both got charged on such flimsy evidence
I think if this was an incident that didn't involve LSU in any way you wouldn't think documented injuries and two different people providing an account of events was "flimsy". All it takes for an arrest is probable cause. It does not mean guilt.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:52 pm to LSUfan007700
quote:
both got charged on such flimsy evidence
from my understanding there were supplemental reports taken that night from the hospital. come about mid day on friday, they could have been in slammer.
again, you need probable cause to arrest. a conviction is a different beast.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:52 pm to LSUfan007700
If they were charged with just that, then the case will be dismissed.
They have some sort of other evidence I would assume.
But if this was a witch hunt and shite goes south for the prosecution then I bet some major arse chewing happens or even worse.
This wasnt a regular investigation, someone higher up made this happen. They can argue with me all they want but it wont change the truth.
They have some sort of other evidence I would assume.
But if this was a witch hunt and shite goes south for the prosecution then I bet some major arse chewing happens or even worse.
This wasnt a regular investigation, someone higher up made this happen. They can argue with me all they want but it wont change the truth.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:52 pm to LSUfan007700
quote:
thats not what I meant, I mean that's retarded they both got charged on such flimsy evidence
Cauble is correct on this. While there may be conflicting evidence, a witness who says I saw JJ do this and that is all that's needed to be charged. Why don't you get that?
Posted on 8/26/11 at 4:54 pm to Stevo
quote:
Why don't you get that?
because people on here do not want to hear it.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 5:02 pm to MsandLa
quote:Believe me i understand the diffrence between arrest and conviction however how do you not see the bias involved in the 2 people on the police report. Especially when there are other reports saying Jefferson didnt do it unless they have other evidence there not sharing it they should move for dismissal.
Cauble is correct on this. While there may be conflicting evidence, a witness who says I saw JJ do this and that is all that's needed to be charged. Why don't you get that?
Posted on 8/26/11 at 5:06 pm to LSUfan007700
So he was at the bar harassing an ex gf with his current gf tagging along?
That's either unlikely or
That's either unlikely or
Posted on 8/26/11 at 5:10 pm to LSUfan007700
quote:
Especially when there are other reports saying Jefferson didnt do it unless they have other evidence there not sharing it they should move for dismissal.
as the INITIAL report read both could have been arrested. however, it appears the police did not just act on that. so several different parties were interviewed and statements were taken. it appears probable cause for arrest was there.
actually brpd was in a catch 22 regarding public opinion on this one
Posted on 8/26/11 at 5:11 pm to LSUfan007700
I don't care what JJ is charged with at this point, I think a two game suspension is warranted.
I say bring him back no matter if he is cleared or not after game two. It would be a sufficient suspension if even found guilty later.
I say bring him back no matter if he is cleared or not after game two. It would be a sufficient suspension if even found guilty later.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 5:12 pm to LSUfan007700
Charged does not equal convicted. Being charged with something is meaningless.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News