Started By
Message

re: Here is Hurt's Intentional Grounding

Posted on 11/7/16 at 7:41 pm to
Posted by VT4
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Jan 2004
841 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 7:41 pm to
No. RT lined up to right of upright and he releases it a yard inside said upright. Clear as day
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16431 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 7:46 pm to
So does the thrower have to be completely outside the "tackle box" (BTW; according to the rule quoted this is a misleading term) or release point or any part of his body?
Posted by Bad Medicine
Member since Aug 2014
3575 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 7:48 pm to
It's really close. I going crazy when the didn't call it in the stadium though
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 7:56 pm to
I came here to ask if anyone here actually knows the rules. The "tackle box" in no way shape or form has anything to do with the physical tackle on the field. lol
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 7:58 pm to
No, go pick up a rule book. THE tackle box has nothing to do with the RT. It's a simple fact that all but one other poster here is wrong about the rule.

quote:

RULE 2 / definitions FR-43
SECTION 34. Tackle Box
ARTICLE 1. a. The tackle box is the rectangular area enclosed by the
neutral zone, the two lines parallel to the sidelines five yards from the
snapper, and Team A’s end line. (See Appendix C.)
b. The tackle box disintegrates when the ball leaves it.
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 8:01 pm
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
5981 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:00 pm to
The definition of tackle box is on the previous page. It is 5 yards either way from the snapper.

This is the definition of intentional grounding: The passer to conserve yardage throws the ball forward into an area where there is no eligible Team A receiver (A.R. 7-3-2-I).

The picture earlier showed he was inside the tackle box. When the ball was let go an LSU player had beaten his block and had a clear path to the QB. I am not sure how this is not intentional grounding.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:03 pm to
Based on the very definition of he rule this is pretty clear definition of intenational grounding. I'm not really sure what the argument against it is based on.
Posted by tigerfan in bamaland
Back Home now
Member since Sep 2006
61108 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

I am not sure how this is not intentional grounding.



That crew was not good.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27899 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Based on the very definition of he rule this is pretty clear definition of intenational grounding

Exact opposite, actually

The tackle clearly lined up inside the upright

The tackle box is in effect until the ball leaves it. When Hurt released the ball, the view of his hand is blocked by the upright, which means the ball was outside the tackle box when he released it

Also, using your logic, every ball intentionally thrown out of bounds would be intentional grounding. Since there is no way a WR could possibly be in that area
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
5981 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

The tackle clearly lined up inside the upright


Read the rule, posted earlier in this thread. The tackle box is 5 yards to either side of the center. He was inside of that when he released it. This was intentional grounding.

ETA: 5 yards to either side of the center at the time the ball is snapped.
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 8:15 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70907 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:16 pm to
I'm aware. And he's still not outside the tackle box.
Posted by tigerfan in bamaland
Back Home now
Member since Sep 2006
61108 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:18 pm to
It was close, I will say that. I dont know the ruling on reviews for IG, but if reviewed, it should have been called.
Posted by BayouBengals18
Fort Worth
Member since Jan 2009
9843 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:21 pm to
Please go read the rule. It's pretty obvious it was grounding when you know the actual rule.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:23 pm to
Omfg real the fricking rule before spouting off more ignorance
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20018 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:31 pm to
Yeah it's pretty ridiculous people are still trying to spout bullshite about the tackle box while the definition is in the thread.

Why do some of our fans seem to not want that to be grounding? It fricking was, and was a huge play in the game. I see that get called more often than not.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

The tackle box is in effect until the ball leaves it. When Hurt released the ball, the view of his hand is blocked by the upright, which means the ball was outside the tackle box when he released it


Posted by theBru
South of I-10
Member since Jun 2013
5072 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:35 pm to
Etling's ball never crossed the LOS, therefore, it was intentional grounding...
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30360 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:58 pm to
#73 is sliding out. Its not where the tackle is, its where they start. This was not a bad call, IMO, and I have been very vocal about how awful the refs were.

ETA: I see the rule, but they NEVER call it based on 5 yards from the center. If they are going to follow the letter of the lW, always, then fine. They dont though and we wouldve screamed bloody murder about getting that call against us.
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 9:05 pm
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16905 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

He rolls outside the tackle box genius.

no
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 9:11 pm to
So spread offenses have a built in disadvantage in the grounding rule due to their choice of splits on the line?

I'm fairly sure most officials know the rule has nothing to do with the position of the tackles
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram