- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:12 pm to LNCHBOX
You probably RA'd it
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:12 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
How many of AJ's were called runs and not scrambles. Don't be stupid.
I'm not being stupid. If anything, YPA for rushing and passing is a pretty good indicator of efficiency.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:13 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
You probably RA'd it
Yea, totally. I always RA thread I participate in.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:14 pm to etm512
quote:
I'm not being stupid. If anything, YPA for rushing and passing is a pretty good indicator of efficiency.
It doesn't factor in that most of AJ's were on broken plays that had no blocking designed for him to run, and he didn't know he was running before the snap.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:14 pm to LNCHBOX
Well you've certainly been torn apart in it, multiple times, I would RA too if I was you.
This post was edited on 12/8/14 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:15 pm to thunderbird1100
Where have I been torn apart exactly?
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:15 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
It's probably because this thread is pointless
It does a pretty good job of pointing out how 2 triple option teams had more effective passing games than a program that tries to claim "drop back passing" and "pro style offense".
quote:
And how many times has this thread been done already?
This one? None.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:15 pm to lsupride87
Just trying to help. Makes you look silly.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:16 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
It's probably because this thread is pointless. AJ was hot garbage this year. Who denies it? And how many times has this thread been done already?
IMO, this is much more a red flag for the system than the players operating it. The simple fact of the matter is that we likely would have a (much?) more productive offense if Les/Cam (whoever you choose to believe makes the decision) were flexible enough to adjust the system around the strengths of the players. Do I think we need to go flexbone triple-option? No. But it is clear, IMHO, that there are other coaches who AJ would look good playing for.
This post was edited on 12/8/14 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:16 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Where have I been torn apart exactly?
Your rushing stats argument on top of you thinking Thomas had "BARELY" better passing stats than Jennings which is laughable.
Have you never heard of QB Efficiency ratings, really?
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:16 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
We'll you've certainly been torn apart in it, multiple times
So true.....Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:17 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Your rushing stats argument
Wasn't torn apart at all actually. Nice try though.
quote:
Have you never heard of QB Efficiency ratings, really?
Yea, Jenning has over 100, so that stat means little to me.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:18 pm to DBU
quote:
IMO, this is much more a red flag for the system than the players operating it
This guy gets it
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:19 pm to DBU
quote:This was the whole point of the thread
IMO, this is much more a red flag for the system than the players operating it. The simple fact of the matter is that we likely would have a (much?) more productive offense if Les/Cam (whoever you choose to believe makes the decision) were flexible enough to adjust the system around the strengths of the players. Do I think we need to go flexbone triple-option? No. But it is clear, IMHO, that there are other coaches who AJ would look good playing for
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:19 pm to DBU
quote:
But it is clear, IMHO, that there are other coaches who AJ would look good playing for.
Clean up the execution in the A&M game's offense, and we would look pretty solid on O.
But I agree with your post otherwise.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:20 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Clean up the execution in the A&M game's offense, and we would look pretty solid on O.
Much of the gameplan in the A&M game involved things we hadn't done all season. Much more zone-read, misdirection, jet sweeps, etc.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:21 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:This. And the second half of Wisky. Where the hell was that offensive system the rest of the season?
Clean up the execution in the A&M game's offense, and we would look pretty solid on O.
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:21 pm to DBU
quote:
Much of the gameplan in the A&M game involved things we hadn't done all season. Much more zone-read, misdirection, jet sweeps, etc.
Yep. It was the kind of offense I thought we'd see all year. There's always next year, right
Posted on 12/8/14 at 3:26 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Wasn't torn apart at all actually. Nice try though.
Yeah I mean Thomas only had twice the yards per attempt Jennings had, good call on that one.
quote:
Yea, Jenning has over 100, so that stat means little to me.
No, I mean, really...
:rotflmao:
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News