Started By
Message

Fournette the latest to spark debate over NFL Draft rules

Posted on 9/24/15 at 12:15 am
Posted by royalvin
juarez
Member since Sep 2015
196 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 12:15 am
LINK /

It was just within the last couple of years national media types were seriously debating whether or not South Carolina defensive end Jadeveon Clowney should sit out the regular season and focus on training for the NFL Draft. Clowney, of course, played what would be his final season at South Carolina and went on to be a top draft pick of the Houston Texans in the 2014 NFL Draft. Do not be surprised if some fall into the trap of suggesting Fournette should consider sitting out the 2016 season so he can focus on the draft. The arguments that will be made may actually carry a little more weight than the arguments for Clowney. Running backs have a short life span in the NFL, and coming back from various types of injuries can be far more inhibiting than at other positions, like defensive end.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38239 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 12:21 am to
LF said already that the rules of the NCAA are right and he doesn't have any problems with them.
Posted by geauxnavybeatbama
Member since Jul 2013
25134 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 12:23 am to
i wouldn't have an issue either if i was running over toddlers

Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38239 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 12:26 am to
Hilarious!
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77931 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 12:33 am to
I said this the other day, Fournette is a freak. For every Fournette, there will be 100 that are not mentally or physically ready for the NFL that think they are. They will fail miserably and lose their college eligibility in the process.

Hell there are tons that come out too early NOW that fail because they aren't physically or mentally ready.

College is still mostly a bunch of big kids playing football. The NFL is full of grown MEN who are playing for their livelihood.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 12:35 am
Posted by la_birdman
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31001 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 12:36 am to
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20379 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:21 am to
hahahahaahahah best gif eva
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Regret nothing that made you smile
Member since Oct 2005
13331 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 2:24 am to
If Fournette stays healthy and has a Heisman type year, I'd be OK with Miles giving him a lighter load, and allowing Guice to become the feature back, or at least the ground game being a more equal share type deal. Wouldn't want to see him get hurt and lose out on millions.
Posted by Buga_Scores
L.C
Member since Jul 2014
1834 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 5:28 am to
I'm sure he will have a nice injury insurance policy for next season.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73142 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 5:36 am to
Myles at UCLA has a 5 million dollar policy as a potential top 10 pick at LB


I imagine LF would have a sizable one too
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
7871 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 5:38 am to
No insurance policy will come close to matching his earnings potential.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56379 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 6:52 am to
quote:

It was just within the last couple of years national media types were seriously debating whether or not South Carolina defensive end Jadeveon Clowney should sit out the regular season and focus on training for the NFL Draft. Clowney, of course, played what would be his final season at South Carolina and went on to be a top draft pick of the Houston Texans in the 2014 NFL Draft. Do not be surprised if some fall into the trap of suggesting Fournette should consider sitting out the 2016 season so he can focus on the draft. The arguments that will be made may actually carry a little more weight than the arguments for Clowney. Running backs have a short life span in the NFL, and coming back from various types of injuries can be far more inhibiting than at other positions, like defensive end.


The NFL can and should have the ability to control the NFL draft and its entrance requirements. Maurice Clarett fought it and lost.

This will be a story...bit any debate is meaningless
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56379 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 6:53 am to
quote:


LF said already that the rules of the NCAA are right and he doesn't have any problems with them.




These aren't NCAA rules. The NCAA has nothing to do with it and is powerless to control it.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56379 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 6:55 am to
quote:

by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
No insurance policy will come close to matching his earnings potential.




It will absolutely match his earnings potential for his first contract.
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13847 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Wouldn't want to see him get hurt and lose out on millions.


We can run him 30 times a game or 3 times a game. It only takes one play to get hurt. That's just the nature of the game.

1) He will have a large insurance policy next year.
2) You look at a guy like Todd Gurley who tore his ACL and then became the 10th overall pick in the draft a few months later. How much money did he really lose?
3) He can get injured in the NFL while still on his rookie contract and never get the huge 2nd contract.

I think the risk is overblown. There's always risk. There is minimal benefit, if any, to sitting a year out.
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13847 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:04 am to
quote:

I said this the other day, Fournette is a freak. For every Fournette, there will be 100 that are not mentally or physically ready for the NFL that think they are. They will fail miserably and lose their college eligibility in the process.

Great point. And not only that, the NFL has this rule to protect itself as well. It's already incredibly hard to project how junior and senior players will do in the NFL. Hell, I heard the other day the Saints have ZERO of their 2014 draft picks still on the active roster. Can you imagine trying to project how 18 and 19 year old kids would do?

The NFL owners don't want their billion dollar franchises hinging on a guessing game.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:11 am to
It's absurd to prevent a player and a team from agreeing to terms when they otherwise would. You can't tell me that all 32 franchises wouldn't sign LF to a contract right now. It's a restriction of capital and completely un-American. I also hate salary caps and draft systems. Teams should have the freedom to sign players to whatever contract they deem appropriate and players should have the same freedom rather than being forced to play in a certain city for X amount of years. How would any of you feel if upon graduation from LSU someone told you that you could only ply your trade in Milwaukee?

All of that having been said, I'm glad we have LF through next season.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 8:14 am
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13847 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Teams should have the freedom to sign players to whatever contract they deem appropriate

The NFL is a private entity and has its own rules. Of course they would sign LF right now, but if they were to allow him to be eligible, they would need to allow all sophomores to be eligible. That's not something they want to do.

quote:

It's a restriction of capital and completely un-American.

An argument can be made that the owners are protecting their capital.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 8:22 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:22 am to
quote:

The NFL is a private entity and has its own rules


No, they are 32 separate entities in competition with one another that have colluded with each other and the players union (who want to protect veteran jobs) to restrict otherwise qualified workers who would be offered a job if not for said collusion.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112278 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:24 am to
quote:

It's absurd to prevent a player and a team from agreeing to terms when they otherwise would. You can't tell me that all 32 franchises wouldn't sign LF to a contract right now. I


That's really adorable, because it's all of those 32 of those teams that created that rule and stick by it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram