Hunter/Rasco appear to be more productive(complete players) than Mingo/Montgomery.
Stats:
Mingo: 38 total tackles
4.5 sacks
8.5 TFL
Montgomery: 37 total tackles
8 sacks
13 TFL
*For 13 games*
Hunter: 55 total tackles
1.5 sacks
10 TFL
Rasco: 42 total tackles
3 sacks
4.5 TFL
*through 9 games*

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by TIGER FAN 72

Member since Jun 2009

716 posts

Posted on 10/29/14 at 9:45 am to laftoothdr

Hmmmm, interdasting...

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by theBru

South of I-10

Member since Jun 2013

5072 posts

Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:14 am to laftoothdr

It's hard to compare oranges to apples...different year, different LB's, different DT's, different DB's, different teams...
All of that makes for different stats...

Compare YA Tittle to Bert Jones to Mett, probably come up with some wildly differing stats, who was the "BEST"??? doesn't make any sense to compare them to begin with...

This thread is kind of like those "Who does he remind you of"...

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Penrod

Member since Jan 2011

39395 posts

Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:19 am to theBru

quote:
It's hard to compare

Good points. Also, this defense is weaker. Therefore teams have probably run more plays against us - at least more running plays in which these guys can get tackles. It's hard for 2011 guys to rack up tackle stats when teams are going 3 and out. And then, when the other team starts sustaining drives, it's at the end of the game when we have substitutes in.

No, you can't judge by stats. It's more about the eye test. So, here is the real rankings:

1. Mingo
2. Hunter
3. Montgomery
4. Rasco

All very good college players.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by laftoothdr

lafayette

Member since Dec 2007

405 posts

Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:53 am to Penrod

Stats are from 2012. I knew 2011 stats hard to compare. Hunter much more complete player.IMO

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by BigOrangeWave