Started By
Message

re: Curious what you guys think about the proposed rule changes for football

Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:22 am to
Posted by BOZ4LSU
A place
Member since Jan 2012
2390 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:22 am to
No way defenseless receiver hits will be reviewable. There will be several ejections the first couple of weeks this season if this gets passed.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53768 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Great! Let's give incompetent refs even more power to affect the outcome of a game!


This
Posted by TIGERFANZZ
THE Death Valley
Member since Nov 2007
4057 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 11:06 am to
That ejection rule is wavering on a very thin line. I mean think of all the missed calls vs the bogus calls that should never have been made. Considering the striped monkeys the SEC has running around with lil yellow flags, I would not like to see this much power granted them.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22777 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 11:06 am to
Great this stupid shite went over so well in the NFL lets bring it to college and screw up that game as well.

Running back ducks his head and helmet to helmet contact results. Offensive players are always trying to make the defense miss... right! But the defensive team player gets flagged for the foul, when in reality it is just as much the offensive players fault.

And without a doubt this should be a reviewable call. Unbelievable amount of these penalties in the NFL get called when there was no foul involved at all.

Reality is they throw the flags for good hits. If you destroy the wr or rb then they throw the flag. Crowd gasp and goes uuuuhhhh the flag comes out.

Ruining the NFL hell yeah bring it to college as well.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19280 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 1:59 pm to
And if the ejection takes place in the second half, the player automatically is suspended for the first half of the next game. A rather still penalty for something that will be a judgment call on the part of SEC refs. They also are proposing a CLM rule: no players playing the same position can wear the same numbers, so no more multiple #30's for our kickers. As well, a L.Kiffen rule: if a player enters the game wearing a different jersey/number than previously worn, he has to notify the refs, who in turn must notify the other team. All have to be voted on, however.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162212 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:03 pm to
quote:


Stupid. It doesn't take 3 seconds.


Right

Why not just require the video of the game clock and the field of play to be synchronized so they can review whether or not the snap gets off
Posted by TigerEast
Alabama
Member since Dec 2003
1451 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:04 pm to
Just what we need. More subjective officiating from SEC officals that has clearly shown a gump bias the past several years.
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
9800 posts
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:43 pm to
I don't care for the thought police in society or as part of a football game. Sorry, but I don't like having one individual determine another individual's intent.

What may appear to be a deliberate high hit may be an unintentional hit that took place because of the speed of the game.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram