- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:35 pm
Pay out for Miles and his staff now for O and his staff, no doubt money means nothing when you do not have to earn that money.....
22
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:39 pm to classof72
Lsu earns that money by being a top 5 most recognizable college brand in the US. Our brand is as recognizable as Bama, Texas, notre dame, Ohio state, and USC. Our name is worth that much money, they earn it from ticket sales tv rights and sponsorships. Not to mention the massive booster money backing them. It ain't your money so stop fricking working about it.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:40 pm to classof72
Orgeron didn’t get big money until we won the natty. That seems to be LSU’s m.o.
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:42 pm to classof72
So how do you get coaches to come to your university when they're all going to make the same money for winning? Money is usually how you lure a coach to your university. How about focusing on doing better with the hiring process instead.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:47 pm to LSU615
If a MONOPOLY did not exist in the world of "sport agents", that would be the ideal situation, with bonuses for winning EACH STEP OF THE WAY.
Those who actually win, may even make more money.
Those who actually win, may even make more money.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:49 pm to classof72
You are hired and paid for your past or potential. You are retained for your achievements. That is the case in most of the business world.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:50 pm to classof72
So we can assume you don't understand how capitalism, the free market, and negotiations work, right?
NO coach, except maybe those desperate for a job, would agree to a contract where they only get paid for wins rather than a contract where they get paid regardless.
Here's how your proposal would work in real life:
Ohio St AD: "Hey coach. We'd like to offer you a 5 year $40 million contract to coach our team."
LSU AD: "Hey coach, we'd like to offer you a 5 year, $60 million contract with payment contingent upon wins. Coach? Coach are your there?"
Coach to LSU AD:
"You aren't serious, right? No thanks. I think I'll just sign with Ohio St. But if you ever decide to live in the real world one day, feel free to call"
NO coach, except maybe those desperate for a job, would agree to a contract where they only get paid for wins rather than a contract where they get paid regardless.
Here's how your proposal would work in real life:
Ohio St AD: "Hey coach. We'd like to offer you a 5 year $40 million contract to coach our team."
LSU AD: "Hey coach, we'd like to offer you a 5 year, $60 million contract with payment contingent upon wins. Coach? Coach are your there?"
Coach to LSU AD:
"You aren't serious, right? No thanks. I think I'll just sign with Ohio St. But if you ever decide to live in the real world one day, feel free to call"Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:51 pm to Locoguan0
In the real world, you are paid bonuses upon achieving them each and every year. You do not get a bonus for you reaching a sales goal 3 years ago.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:51 pm to rbdallas
I totally agree with this:
Example
Base salary 3 million:
under 7 wins immediate termination
7 wins 1 million dollar bonus
8 Wins 2 million dollar bonus
9 wins 3 million dollar bonus
10 wins 4 million dollar bonus'
etc...
Example
Base salary 3 million:
under 7 wins immediate termination
7 wins 1 million dollar bonus
8 Wins 2 million dollar bonus
9 wins 3 million dollar bonus
10 wins 4 million dollar bonus'
etc...
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:52 pm to classof72
That's not the climate of the market though
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:53 pm to classof72
So you would void contract law and reorder capitalism . Let me ask you, did you make your bed this morning?
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:54 pm to classof72
It would be nice if the Contracts were low base pay with a high incentive pay, but we would never get a decent coach.
Base-1M
8 Games- 500K bonus
10 Games- 2M bonus
12 Games -4M Bonus
CFP appearance- 2M
NCAA champs- 2M
Base-1M
8 Games- 500K bonus
10 Games- 2M bonus
12 Games -4M Bonus
CFP appearance- 2M
NCAA champs- 2M
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:57 pm to classof72
quote:
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
O literally got paid for winning the national championship.
I dont understand whats going on here.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 12:58 pm to classof72
quote:that would be difficult, but the OP has a point. It's nauseating when coaches utterly fail, yet receive massive buyouts.
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
Orgeron, Pelini, Willie Taggert at FSU all come to mind. Many others, I'm sure.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:06 pm to classof72
Why do you hate capitalism?
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:10 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:none of us hate capitalism, but it doesn't bother you when a bad coach gets a massive buyout merely for failing?
Why do you hate capitalism?
It's like a bad CEO who ran a company into the ground, but has a sick golden parachute.
Now sure, it's all in the contract so the guy gets what's required, but you're not human if you're not a little bothered by an utter failure being rewarded with an massive buyout.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:11 pm to classof72
Almost every contract is based on what you did more than what you’re gonna do.
No one takes an insanely performance based contract
No one takes an insanely performance based contract
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:11 pm to classof72
quote:
Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning
That’s exactly why Coach O got that fat raise, he won a championship.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:11 pm to TheAstroTiger
Not when a couple of agents control about 85% or so of the coaches.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:13 pm to Sir Fury
quote:
That’s exactly why Coach O got that fat raise, he won a championship.
Give the coach THE BIGGG BONUS for winning...next year is a new year....earn it again.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News