- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Charles Scott 238 pounds at combine
Posted on 2/26/10 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 2/26/10 at 1:53 pm
Well, so much for losing weight.
4.7 40 here we come!
4.7 40 here we come!
Posted on 2/26/10 at 1:55 pm to thunderbird1100
I hope he's trading speed for stregnth given he'll probably get drafted as a FB.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:06 pm to TheDoc
What is the big deal did anyone really expect him to be like 220 or something? Scott is a bigger RB not sure why this is a surprise.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:06 pm to 225rumpshaker
Because he is going to run an awful 40 time at that size.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:07 pm to 225rumpshaker
i always thought that the 225 he would be listed at was bogus.... there is no way him and keiland were the same size...
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:07 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
4.7 40
To tell you the truth I think that is gonna be generous.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:09 pm to sabes que
Pretty much are Keiland weighed in at 233lbs
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:10 pm to 225rumpshaker
He did lose weight, he was 240 a couple weeks ago.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:11 pm to NOSA
quote:You really think he would run that much better of a time if he were 5 or 10 lbs lighter? I mean seriously that Scott was never going to be a 4.5 guy. He is going to be a between the tackles pound it guy and if he is timed at 4.7 that will be fine at his size.
Because he is going to run an awful 40 time at that size
I mean how fast do you guys think RB's are in the NFL?
This post was edited on 2/26/10 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:13 pm to 225rumpshaker
quote:
What is the big deal did anyone really expect him to be like 220 or something? Scott is a bigger RB not sure why this is a surprise.
Because he's been bustin it at CES in Atlanta for the last 6 weeks. Should have come in at least 5-8 pounds lighter. I just hope he runs under 4.7.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:15 pm to 225rumpshaker
quote:
What is the big deal did anyone really expect him to be like 220 or something
No, but NFL scouts look at things like this. He knows he's overweight and has packed on one too many pounds recently, yet for the biggest job interview of his life he showed to them he cant control his weight problem.
quote:
Scott is a bigger RB not sure why this is a surprise.
Huge difference in being a "big back" at 5'11ish 238 pounds and about 225. At 238 he is just painfully slow and out of shape. He would be much more effective about 10-15 pounds lighter. He cant carry 240 pounds very well.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:16 pm to BBATiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/26/10 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:17 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
He cant carry 240 pounds very well.
Link?
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:18 pm to 225rumpshaker
quote:
He is going to be a between the tackles pound it guy and if he is timed at 4.7 that will be fine at his size. I mean how fast do you guys think RB's are in the NFL?
Faster than that. Almost no RB runs a 4.7 at the combine. And I thought running a 4.6 would be fine for Scott but I think there is serious question if he can do that now.
I think Shonn Greene ran around the 4.7's at the combine, but he came back and ran better later. I'm not sure Scott can do that.
This post was edited on 2/26/10 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:18 pm to alange
quote:
Link?
Zero breakaway speed. I can't believe some folks actually think almost 240 pounds is fine for him. It's not like he's 6'1 or 6'2.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:23 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Zero breakaway speed. I can't believe some folks actually think almost 240 pounds is fine for him. It's not like he's 6'1 or 6'2.
it's crazy that people are acting shocked as if him weighing a lot is a new thing. he rushed for 1200 yards carrying that weight in 2008. he'll be fine
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:26 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
4.7 40 here we come!
I'll take the slight over. Around 4.75.
He wouldn't be a burner at 225, but probably would have been around 4.65. Which would have improved his stock.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:27 pm to lsufball19
quote:
he rushed for 1200 yards carrying that weight in 2008. he'll be fine
He was not 240 back then. Maybe 230-235, but not as big as he got now. If he just lost some decent weight he could carry himself much better.
Posted on 2/26/10 at 2:28 pm to Cash
quote:
He wouldn't be a burner at 225, but probably would have been around 4.65. Which would have improved his stock.
Yeah, I wouldn't ever expect anything amazing from Scott speed wise, but at least was looking for something that impresses scouts or is about what they were expecting. Running a 4.7 will impress no one is all I'm saying.
This post was edited on 2/26/10 at 2:28 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News