- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CFB teams with the toughest schedules and least returning starters in 2017
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:24 pm
LSU comes in at number 2.
https://www.fbschedules.com/2017/05/worst-case-scenario-cfb-teams-toughest-schedules-least-returning-starters-2017/
quote:
2. LSU
2017 FBS Schedule Rank: 2
2017 FBS Returning Starter Rank: T103
quote:
The Tigers’ situation is almost the mirror image of what ECU faces in. The difference comes down to a schedule that includes nine opponents that finished last season with a winning record/ten that made the post season and four that finished in the Top 25 for LSU vs. 8/9/3 respectively for the Pirates.
LSU’s 11 returning starters earns it a tie for the bottom slot in the SEC. It breaks down to six back on offense and five back on D. The strength of last year’s 8-4 product was a defense that ranked No. 5 in the FBS in scoring, No. 13 vs. the run and No. 23 vs. the pass.
The Tigers are second of the two schools on our list also mentioned in ESPN’s premature Top 25. At No. 9, LSU has top-ten expectations to go along with a wicked schedule and high turnover.
https://www.fbschedules.com/2017/05/worst-case-scenario-cfb-teams-toughest-schedules-least-returning-starters-2017/
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:29 pm to Tiger Ree
To be expected and I'm good with this but where's Bama?
Only odd thing to me is the comparison to ECU. Don't recognize the similarity and do they even deserve to be mentioned in our paragraph?
Only odd thing to me is the comparison to ECU. Don't recognize the similarity and do they even deserve to be mentioned in our paragraph?
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:35 pm to lsutigermall
Were #9 ?? That's generous.. I was thinking top 15-16 at best right now
Posted on 5/18/17 at 1:03 pm to Tiger Ree
expecting the defense to be between our 2011 and 2012 defense in terms of talent and depth.
offense just needs to consistently move the ball
we'll be alright
offense just needs to consistently move the ball
we'll be alright
Posted on 5/18/17 at 1:18 pm to TheHat7
Well on offense LSU has 4 OL that I would consider starters from last year plus Etling, Chark, Moore at HB ,Moreau at TE, and Guice. Somehow, technical bs is keeping 3 of them from counting as returning starters, but in my book that is nine.
On defense, Thompson and Loc would have been starters except for injury and Loc has been a two year starter. White, Alexander, and Divinity all played quite a bit as did Heron,Lawrence, and big ED did as well. Gilmore, Key, Jackson, Tolliver, and Battle. So I see a team that has many quality snaps under it's belt not to mention guys like Davis, Anderson, Brumfield, Williams, Mouton, Smith, Fulton, I. Washington, Sci and others that have played.
I have always thought the returning starter stat is way overblown especially in position groups with natural rotations, RBs, WRs, TEs, and all the defensive groups.
On defense, Thompson and Loc would have been starters except for injury and Loc has been a two year starter. White, Alexander, and Divinity all played quite a bit as did Heron,Lawrence, and big ED did as well. Gilmore, Key, Jackson, Tolliver, and Battle. So I see a team that has many quality snaps under it's belt not to mention guys like Davis, Anderson, Brumfield, Williams, Mouton, Smith, Fulton, I. Washington, Sci and others that have played.
I have always thought the returning starter stat is way overblown especially in position groups with natural rotations, RBs, WRs, TEs, and all the defensive groups.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:11 pm to NotRight37
They also don't count addition by subtraction. Where the "new" player is better than guy that started the year before.
This doesn't affect LSU this year but in computing the strength of a team for next year across all of college football, this has to affect 25% of teams at a minimum.
This doesn't affect LSU this year but in computing the strength of a team for next year across all of college football, this has to affect 25% of teams at a minimum.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:26 pm to Tiger Ree
Aaaaannd, we're fricked. 8-4.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 2:51 pm to The Mick
Looking at the schedule I really don't see us going any worse than 9-3. And I predict 10-2.
I think we beat UF cuz they lose a lot and they lucked into a win last year.
I am 50/50 with AU. They usually don't play well in BR plus they usually aren't very good when expectations are high BUT, they have a QB that fits their system and a pretty good Defense.
Ole miss has to much going against them with this NCAA stuff and the post season ban, they'll quit by the time we play them.
I guess I should put BYU as a toss up as well since they get a tune up game and it will be our first game with this new offense.
The only loss I think is certain is Bama and that's because we play in Tuscaloosa and Etling isn't the QB to beat them (I'm a HUGE Etling supporter btw, love his toughness)
A&M won't beat us until they get a new coach.
Arky isn't playing against Les Miles anymore which is all the info needed.
Tennessee loses a ton and hasn't recruited well in 2 years. Plus they have a coach that made Miles look like a sideline coaching guru.
MSU doesn't have Dak Prescott to will them to a win. Fitzgerald just isn't a game changer.
The rest are cupcakes.
Predictions
*BYU - W 24-17 (toss up?)
Chattanooga- W 56-0
@MSU - W 35-14
Syracuse - W 49-10
Troy - W 42-7
@Florida - Toss up- W 28-10
Auburn - Toss Up- L 24-28
@Ole Miss - W 35-21
@ Bama - L 21-24
Arkansas- W 35-14
@Tennessee- W 31-10
Texas A&M - W 42-10 (Aranda's Revenge!)
Edit: took this post to the SEC rant to rustle some Jimmies.
I think we beat UF cuz they lose a lot and they lucked into a win last year.
I am 50/50 with AU. They usually don't play well in BR plus they usually aren't very good when expectations are high BUT, they have a QB that fits their system and a pretty good Defense.
Ole miss has to much going against them with this NCAA stuff and the post season ban, they'll quit by the time we play them.
I guess I should put BYU as a toss up as well since they get a tune up game and it will be our first game with this new offense.
The only loss I think is certain is Bama and that's because we play in Tuscaloosa and Etling isn't the QB to beat them (I'm a HUGE Etling supporter btw, love his toughness)
A&M won't beat us until they get a new coach.
Arky isn't playing against Les Miles anymore which is all the info needed.
Tennessee loses a ton and hasn't recruited well in 2 years. Plus they have a coach that made Miles look like a sideline coaching guru.
MSU doesn't have Dak Prescott to will them to a win. Fitzgerald just isn't a game changer.
The rest are cupcakes.
Predictions
*BYU - W 24-17 (toss up?)
Chattanooga- W 56-0
@MSU - W 35-14
Syracuse - W 49-10
Troy - W 42-7
@Florida - Toss up- W 28-10
Auburn - Toss Up- L 24-28
@Ole Miss - W 35-21
@ Bama - L 21-24
Arkansas- W 35-14
@Tennessee- W 31-10
Texas A&M - W 42-10 (Aranda's Revenge!)
Edit: took this post to the SEC rant to rustle some Jimmies.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:27 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
Plus they have a coach that made Miles look like a sideline coaching guru.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 3:30 pm to tigersbh
We won't lose to Auburn at home
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News