Started By
Message

re: A Concern about Mike's Cancer

Posted on 5/23/16 at 9:53 am to
Posted by LSUDonMCO
Orlando
Member since Dec 2003
6849 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 9:53 am to
When we do have to get a new Mike, I hope we can look at breeding him. Poor Roscoe was fixed and has to die a virgin.
Posted by lsubuddy
houma, la
Member since Jul 2014
4293 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 9:59 am to
They tried that once before didn't they?
Posted by ULSU
Tasmania
Member since Jan 2014
3931 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:50 am to
quote:

When we do have to get a new Mike, I hope we can look at breeding him. Poor Roscoe was fixed and has to die a virgin.


I'm not for breeding captive Tigers. In my ideal world, there wouldn't be any in captivity, but they are. Tigers ought to be able to live in the wild and have their 200 mile territory to live freely.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

But is anyone else a little concerned that if we lose him there will be a push from sources to do away with a live Tiger mascot?


LSU has already had to deal with the likes of PET on this matter. It will only get worse.
Posted by camplsu
Section 210
Member since Feb 2007
1527 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 11:26 am to
Lighten up Francis. It's only Monday morning you're going to have a long week if you're already rustled.

Let me share a little story with you my friend. I have two dogs, a German Shepard and a Great Dane. According to the breed types, the great dane is supposed to be chill and lazy while the German Shepard is supposed to be fearless. Well this couldn't be further from the truth for both dogs. The Great Dane has made a habit of jumping out of moving vehicles. What I have learned is that all animals of the same species (and/or breed) are different whether it be dogs, humans, tigers or possums.

The moral of this story is if the powers that be at LSU take their time and research the behaviors of the possible replacements they could increase the likelihood of finding a tiger more receptive to going to the games. Mike V didn't mind getting into that cage while Mike VI did. Both were tigers but with different behavior patterns. They used to walk Mike V on a leash around campus when it was a cub. Maybe that is what caused Mike V to not mind getting in the cage. Maybe that wasn't what made the difference but something was. LSU has enough resources to find an animal behaviorist that can determine what tiger would be more receptive. Hell, maybe we should get a rescued circus tiger. It would probably be more likely to obey.

As for you and your scare tactics that we will never have another tiger again if I complain, I got 3 million reasons why LSU will always have a tiger. The university isn't going to have a $3 million 15,000 sqft empty cage in the heart of its campus. Also, what is the benefit and economic impact to the LSU vet school that the university has a live tiger on campus? I bet that doesn't help attract potential vet students from all over the country at all. You and anybody else who uses that scare tactic can get fricked.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram