Started By
Message
locked post

A bunch of people are freaking out regarding the passing yards that

Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:23 am
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52157 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:23 am
we gave up. When a team throws the ball 70 times on you, it's expected that they put up some yards. After taking a look at their passing stats compared to ours, they are not so different.

Yards Per Attempt: LSU - 6.4 WVU - 7.1
Yards Per Completion: LSU - 11.2 WVU - 12.1


Maybe this will put things into perspective and comfort some of the naysayers.

Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:24 am to
I'm not worried about it really. They just hit a lot of quick slants and small stuff that we were willing to give up. They had no run so we didn't even worry about bringing more then 4 rushers.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52157 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:25 am to
quote:

I'm not worried about it really
Neither am I. The defense clamped down when it really mattered
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:26 am to
Look at the stats once WVU got back within a TD. That defense never let them sniff midfield really.
Posted by ccomeaux
LA
Member since Jan 2010
8184 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:27 am to
We allowed that yardage as much as they earned it. I'm more concerned that we didn't get a sack than that we gave up 450 yds passing on 65 attempts in a road win blowout.
Posted by swampfox
Gonzales
Member since Sep 2009
36 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:28 am to
It doesn't bother me with the yards passing that we gave up. It was more of letting them have the small pass plays versus giving up long yardage plays which is the better idea.
Posted by Bandits
Lafayette
Member since Sep 2008
3170 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:29 am to
Until you remove the flaming A from your post, no one cares.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:29 am to
Those people are just your typical LSU fans: bitching and complaining and not having a damn clue. Our Def coaches recognized the potential difficulties with the match-ups, developed a strategy to overcome them, implemented it well, and it worked great.

THAT's good coaching.

A lot of defenses would get fatigued with allowing the long drives, but ours is so deep we can keep rotating in fresh players.

Anyone else think it was kind of like a football rope-a-dope?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89615 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:29 am to
quote:

we gave up. When a team throws the ball 70 times on you, it's expected that they put up some yards. After taking a look at their passing stats compared to ours, they are not so different.


The field position caused the yardage differential, especially with our game plan to defend against the screen pass - our drives ended in the endzone - WVU's drives ended in punts - we started at midfield and they started inside their own 10.

It's not any more complicated than that.
This post was edited on 9/26/11 at 9:30 am
Posted by TheBaker
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2004
4314 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:31 am to
i'm a little concerned with LSU's front four not getting to Gino, but not about the yards. it's a gimmick, Hal Mumme style freaking offense that throws the damned ball 100 times a game. yes, they will get yards...but LSU almost/should've (RR's dropped TD) hung 50+ points on them while more than doubling their point total...in the "biggest game of their history" on their home turf. i'm satisfied with that! what's makes them WV and Big East is that they're bragging about all of the yards they threw for.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:32 am to
quote:

I'm more concerned that we didn't get a sack
Not easy to do in drop back pass situation with a quick release QB, and risky to try it too often.
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:33 am to
Some plays G.Smith had all day long to throw the ball. Our lack of sacks was due to their amount of protection. They were NOT going to allow any pass rush. 6-7 blockers at all times.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52157 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:35 am to
quote:

and risky to try it too often.
Yeah, I was worried that we would get burned as soon as we decided to blitz
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43222 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:36 am to
Why do you have an Alabama logo?
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:36 am to
The more I think about it, it was a rope a dope.

Pure genius.
Posted by ccomeaux
LA
Member since Jan 2010
8184 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:37 am to
Yeah, I was worried that we would get burned as soon as we decided to blitz

We shouldn't have to blitz to get at least one sack a game. Smith could have knitted a freakin sweater back there on a few plays.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43222 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Not easy to do in drop back pass situation with a quick release QB, and risky to try it too often.
Lots of his throws were not quick release, he stood back there all day long waiting for a receiver to get open.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52157 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Why do you have an Alabama logo?
Haven't changed it from Saturday. I loathe Arkanas
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43222 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:38 am to
Posted by Tigerpaul1969
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Jan 2010
4466 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 9:51 am to
Yes, it was fun watching Arky get their butts handed to them. I can't stand Petrino. Saban is much more likable than that dude.

On the passing yardage issue, after rewatching the game, it just never appeared they were getting that number of yards. It was never a situation where I was worried about what they were doing. I think we turned down the intensity in the third quarter up by 20, but after the Claiborne return, they never really did much.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram