re: 82% of poll says Miles should not be fired

quote:

---

I think the more prevailing sentiment was that a replacement isn't always a sure thing.

---

I can assure you that the Les supporters I speak of are the ones like Choctaw, LUNCHBOX, Beefense, etc... I apologize for generalizing and my exaggeration. This all stems from this Posi/Nega bullshite that people so love to create in every facet of life.

I would never support going forward with the firing of a coach of Miles resume without the proper vetting and securing of an adequate replacement. Anyone who would is obtuse. This argument was just an excuse for those who wanted Les retained. From many legitimate sources after the fact, it seems the Jimbo deal was on the table. This makes the whole argument null and void.

What about all of those that were refuting that replacing him was the right idea, the ones I was referring to? What about those? Because surely you don't deny that plenty on here refused to get on board with anything to do with Les not being LSU's football coach next year?

I just want those people to claim ownership of their stance, as I do mine. All of these people arguing the same thing over and over, quickly devolving every thread to personal attacks and name calling... I want it to be known that they mock any idea opposing their own is not being a true fan or supporting LSU, yet should Les be removed, this entire charade would just invert and the extreme of those that were outraged at the idea of firing Les would immediately become the ones that look for failure to support their position -- just as those of the extreme side of removing Les would relentlessly back the replacement and ignore any failures or slips.

It is a parade of fools, and I am quickly seeing why I had never put myself through the agony of posting and trying to reason with these people. It's like Facebook, or even worse, Twitter. I could never understand why these people would post their uninformed opinions and think it was worthwhile for others...