Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

7/8 - 4/6 - 11/11 - 2/1 - 6/7

Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:44 pm
Posted by EWE
The rubber chicken circut
Member since Jul 2004
1365 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:44 pm
Rivals/ESPN recruiting class rankings for the last 5 years.

To suggest that LSU has slipped in any way in terms of drawing the best athletes in the country to Baton Rouge is ridicules.

Here is how the 8 other "Elite Programs" fared in that same span as of 5:30 est. CST 2010:

FSU 3/6 - 21/25 - 9/12 - 7/8 - 10/6

UF 2/1 - 1/2 - 3/4 - 11/5 - 1/1

UT 5/3 - 5/3 - 14/10 - 5/3 - 3/2

OSU 12/10 - 15/20 - 4/6 - 5/3 - NA/14

OU 9/7 - 14/NA - 6/8 - 13/11 - 7/5

USC 1/2 - 2/1 - 8/7 - 4/4 - 2/8

UA 11/18 - 10/17 - 1/3 - 1/2 - 5/3

UGA 4/4 - 9/13 - 7/5 - 6/6 - 16/11

In those 5 years, out of the elite 8 teams listed LSU finished compositely ranked tied for 6th in '06, tied for 3rd in '07, tied for 6th in '08, tied for 1st in '09, and tied for 4th this year.

That my friend is consistency.

Every year there will be a couple of teams that have great recruiting classes that push LSU's ranking higher or lower. In '06 it was ND, '07 PSU, '08 the U, '09 UNC, and this year AU. Those teams all had the same thing in common...none of them had finished in the top ten of either of the rankings more than 3 times. NONE finished with a composite top 10 ranking.

ND came close after finishing '06 at 5/8, '07 at 8/8, and '08 at 2/9. But the wheels came of the wagon finishing '09 21/14, then a 14/21 class this year.

With the strength of this years class, Auburn also come close with a '06 class of 10/12, followed by a '07 class at 7/7. However, '08's 20/19 class and '09's 19/25 finish kept them out of consideration.

Another SEC stalwart, Tennessee had a shot with a banner 3/5 class in '07, a 10/15 class in '08, and this years 9/9 class. But '06's 23/20 class, and the top 25 goose egg class of '08 killed them.

Of the elite 8 teams LSU competes with, NONE have had more than one year where they fished with a composite class above a top 15 ranking.

From '06 to '10...

ONLY UF, USC, AND LSU HAVE NEVER HAD A CLASS RANKED BY RIVALS OR ESPN RANKED HIGHER THAN 11TH!

GEAUX TIGERS!


This post was edited on 2/3/10 at 5:48 pm
Posted by lsuougel
lafayette
Member since Nov 2008
3136 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:46 pm to
you are calling FSU elite the last few years?
Posted by EWE
The rubber chicken circut
Member since Jul 2004
1365 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:49 pm to
In terms of recruiting...yes. The numbers don't lie.

Unfortunately for the Seminole Nation, those great classes didn't transfer into wins on the field.
Posted by lsuougel
lafayette
Member since Nov 2008
3136 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:51 pm to
just wondering,,where did you get the stats from..i'm trying to find rival's 2005 final rankings
Posted by yurintroubl
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
30164 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately for the Seminole Nation, those great classes didn't transfer into wins on the field.


Unfortunately for the Seminole Nation, those great classes didn't end up actually taking classes in their field and ended in transfers.
Posted by BayouTigers4Life
Chi-town
Member since Dec 2004
6963 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:57 pm to
So we have had elite recruiting but the product our team put on the field past two seasons has been putrid.

So is it the coaching?

Or is RP still to be blamed?
Posted by tirebiter
7K R&G chile land aka SF
Member since Oct 2006
9204 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

From '06 to '10... ONLY UF, USC, AND LSU HAVE NEVER HAD A CLASS RANKED BY RIVALS OR ESPN RANKED HIGHER THAN 11TH!


...then you know what the question is, when do recruiting rankings show up on the field?

With that said I am very happy with this class, Copeland and Ferguson were great to pull in.
Posted by TigersRuleTheEarth
Laffy
Member since Jan 2007
28643 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

putrid.


really? Is this the word you meant to use?
Posted by RockChalkTiger
A Little Bit South of Saskatoon
Member since May 2009
10335 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately for the Seminole Nation, those great classes didn't transfer into wins on the field.


Uhhhh...
Nevermind.
Posted by BayouTigers4Life
Chi-town
Member since Dec 2004
6963 posts
Posted on 2/3/10 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

really? Is this the word you meant to use?

Got a better word to describe the 112th ranked offense?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram